Greg S Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: It’s expensive to live in California for sure but the visual problem is just as bad, if not worse. Aesthetically this state looks nothing like what it did when I first moved here many years ago. It’s filthy! Homeless people and graffiti are everywhere. I dare any tourist to walk down Hollywood Boulevard and not be shocked at what they’ve let it become. This is what happens when you let empathy run amuck and I’m guessing it’ll take decades to clean it all up…if they ever can. A 100% unforced error! That would require CA to vote R and we know that will never happen. I hear its worse in Pelosi town (SF).
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 Just now, Greg S said: That would require CA to vote R and we know that will never happen. I hear its worse in Pelosi town (SF). I’m not so sure that even most democrats aren’t ready to reverse course. It’s gotten to be that obvious. Supporting well intentioned Liberal policies is one thing but when there are homeless encampments under virtually every freeway bridge I have to believe people are about to say ‘enough already’! It was the #1 topic in the most recent LA mayoral election. Unfortunately they just keep doubling down on these ‘solutions’. There has to be an abrupt turn around at some point. There just has to be! 2
Doc Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 25 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I’m not so sure that even most democrats aren’t ready to reverse course. It’s gotten to be that obvious. Supporting well intentioned Liberal policies is one thing but when there are homeless encampments under virtually every freeway bridge I have to believe people are about to say ‘enough already’! It was the #1 topic in the most recent LA mayoral election. Unfortunately they just keep doubling down on these ‘solutions’. There has to be an abrupt turn around at some point. There just has to be! It's going to be at rock bottom. That's when most people who don't have any insight (sometimes) realize things need to change. 1
Westside Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 2 minutes ago, Doc said: It's going to be at rock bottom. That's when most people who don't have any insight (sometimes) realize things need to change. Makes you wonder what exactly is rock bottom? 1
Doc Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 7 minutes ago, Westside said: Makes you wonder what exactly is rock bottom? I shudder to think... 1
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Chris farley said: I don't disagree. Just asking the self-described liberal to give me their opinion of what todays liberals are. I mean, if we are talking the squad? its socialistic. Im a registered DEM in NYS. somewhere in the last decade we went from holding them accountable to just blind support cause the other team sucks. (like sports fans) Is Hockel a modern Liberal? I thought for sure Mary Peltola would be that moderate she ran as. but then voted yes for every damn corporate welfare and fed consolidation bill the dems pushed. To me, modern liberals are people like Pete Buttigieg or Harry Wilson. People who use the free markets for social changes without unnecessary and inefficient government reach. 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: I no longer live in WNY but living in California, I can tell you that there’s no doubt what a liberal is. The State is crawling with them and they’ve slowly made an absolute mess of this place. In a nutshell your modern liberal has abandoned traditional morality in search of a new age social utopia. Some would say it’s a noble goal. But to achieve/fund it they of course are in desperate need of other people’s money. What does morality have to do with economics? Can you cite any specific examples? 51 minutes ago, Greg S said: That would require CA to vote R and we know that will never happen. I hear its worse in Pelosi town (SF). What policies do republicans offer to solve homelessness? 1
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: The only people who think the Club Q shooter wasn’t homophobic are republicans with their head in the sand.
Doc Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: The only people who think the Club Q shooter wasn’t homophobic are republicans with their head in the sand. The shooter said they (sic) are non-binary. 1
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, Doc said: The shooter said they (sic) are non-binary. His lawyer used this to try to avoid a hate crime charge. He is not non-binary. https://www.cpr.org/2022/12/07/club-q-shooting-suspect-unsealed-arrest-affidavit/ Edited January 2, 2023 by Roundybout
aristocrat Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: His lawyer used this to try to avoid a hate crime charge. He is not non-binary. https://www.cpr.org/2022/12/07/club-q-shooting-suspect-unsealed-arrest-affidavit/ this is hate speech and will only cause violence towards that community. You cannot question someone’s gender identity. 1
B-Man Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 9 minutes ago, Roundybout said: The only people who think the Club Q shooter wasn’t homophobic are republicans with their head in the sand. How ironic. It is very well documented, but you keep clinging to your false story. . 1
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: How ironic. It is very well documented, but you keep clinging to your false story. . Source? Because people close to him have said he's trolling. 4 minutes ago, aristocrat said: this is hate speech and will only cause violence towards that community. You cannot question someone’s gender identity. 🙄 Let me know when you guys get any new material. This stuff is so stale. Edited January 2, 2023 by Roundybout
Doc Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: His lawyer used this to try to avoid a hate crime charge. He is not non-binary. Is there proof of this? And why shouldn't we believe them and not, say, someone like Lia Thomas?
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 Just now, Doc said: Is there proof of this? And why shouldn't we believe them and not, say, someone like Lia Thomas? https://www.metroweekly.com/2022/12/is-the-club-q-shooter-trolling-by-claiming-to-be-nonbinary/
Doc Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: https://www.metroweekly.com/2022/12/is-the-club-q-shooter-trolling-by-claiming-to-be-nonbinary/ So...one person with whom they had a falling out? Any anti-LGBTQ+ stuff on Twitter, FB, Insta?
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What does morality have to do with economics? Can you cite any specific examples? California has decided to go “all in” on letting people do whatever they want with their lives, even if it means self destructive behavior such as rampant drug use and crime. Then, when it turns into the predictable mess, they reach out to taxpayers to fix it. Edited January 2, 2023 by SoCal Deek
Roundybout Posted January 2, 2023 Posted January 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, Doc said: So...one person with whom they had a falling out? Any anti-LGBTQ+ stuff on Twitter, FB, Insta? How about the fact that the legal filing mentions nonbinary, but his parents, lawyers and friends all refer to him as a dude? It was a strategic move by him to try and avoid a hate crime. 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: California has decided to go “all in” on letting people do whatever they want with their lives, even if it means self destructive behavior such as rampant drug use and crime. Then, when it turns into the predictable mess, they reach out to taxpayers to fix it. Sounds like a libertarian wet dream! Down with the government, you do what you want!! 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: HELL YEA BRO JUST OWN DA LIBS WE HAVE NO ACTUAL POLICY BEYOND MAKING UP THINGS TO BE MAD AT 1
Recommended Posts