Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No one takes you seriously, nor should they. Who "discovered" it was a leak from a lab? Where did the original story come from and how was it circulated? That might help you understand, don't you think? 

Just because I call you dim doesn’t mean you should immediately confirm it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Just because I call you dim doesn’t mean you should immediately confirm it. 

Afraid to back up your stupid bull sh it? You are so MAGA 🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

Good god man. What do you call the immediate suppression of information regarding the possibility of a lab leak in 20-21? Cotton was smeared left and right over it. “Reliable” mainstream media called the possibility of a lab leak “a debunked conspiracy theory”. People were called racists for thinking it. 
 

Now the big question - why was that? What was to be gained? Scraps opines that the “experts” didn’t want to be viewed as racist. 🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽🤦🏽‍♂️

Do you think all the world's molecular biologists are in bed with China?  This kinda shite is their lives meaning.  Who doesn't want to save the world from the next one?

Posted

Hahaha you republicans have been had. I always said if you take medical advice from a politician you get what you deserve! Tell him to put his money where his mouth is. Oh wait. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Hahaha you republicans have been had. I always said if you take medical advice from a politician you get what you deserve! Tell him to put his money where his mouth is. Oh wait. 

 

You think we don't know that you don't have to be a Democrat to be a crook? Corruption runs wide and deep in our government on both sides.

Posted
14 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

You think we don't know that you don't have to be a Democrat to be a crook? Corruption runs wide and deep in our government on both sides.

He wasn't pointing our corruption.  He was pointing out hypocrisy.

Posted
Just now, Scraps said:

He wasn't pointing our corruption.  He was pointing out hypocrisy.

Aaah, thanks Scrapheap, I assumed being a hypocrite makes one corrupt.

Posted
30 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Can one of the FauciFanatics tell us the reason for suppressing lab leak theories? 

Sure.  The CIA picked him up in a helicopter, flew him to a remote island and informed him that world peace was dependent on his doing that.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Sure.  The CIA picked him up in a helicopter, flew him to a remote island and informed him that world peace was dependent on his doing that.

It seems like a hard question to answer, at least for his fans here. All that’s been posited so far is something about not being viewed as a racist. That came from the guy that gave you a laugh emoji. 

Posted

It's weird how Noem gets attacked for killing a dog, and rightfully so, if you agree with it or not, but.........

 

this dirtbag Ouchi kills MILLIONS of beagles and NO ONE says a word.

 

Amazing. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Scraps said:

He wasn't pointing our corruption.  He was pointing out hypocrisy.

 

It's not even hypocrisy.  It's smart investing.  She doesn't have to believe in the treatments, just that it will make money for the company.

Posted
29 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It seems like a hard question to answer, at least for his fans here. All that’s been posited so far is something about not being viewed as a racist. That came from the guy that gave you a laugh emoji. 

Duh!  How in anyone on this board supposed to know what somebody like Fauci was thinking?

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

It's not even hypocrisy.  It's smart investing.  She doesn't have to believe in the treatments, just that it will make money for the company.

The drug won't be approved if it not shown to be effective in clinical trial.  Whether she or you believe in the treatment or not doesn't matter.

Posted
Just now, Scraps said:

Duh!  How in anyone on this board supposed to know what somebody like Fauci was thinking?

Everybody here gives their opinion on every topic under the sun. Other than your “they didn’t want to be seen as racists” effort, nobody has anything to offer. Feeble as it was, at least you took a stab at it. 

Posted
3 hours ago, 4th&long said:

Hahaha you republicans have been had. I always said if you take medical advice from a politician you get what you deserve! Tell him to put his money where his mouth is. Oh wait. 

 

Clarence Thomas - "I can't control the elections my wife wants to overthrow!"

Antonin Scalia - "I can't control the flags my wife wants to fly!"

Rand Paul - "I can't control the stocks my wife wants to buy!"

 

Well that last one makes some sense ...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

I have to admit that John Stewart explains it in a much more entertaining manner than I do. 

 

He's very funny, very bright and not wrong, yet.  Correlation doesn't mean causation.  People with lighters in their pockets get lung cancer more often.  Doesn't mean lighters cause lung cancer.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

He's very funny, very bright and not wrong, yet.  Correlation doesn't mean causation.  People with lighters in their pockets get lung cancer more often.  Doesn't mean lighters cause lung cancer.


More like people with lighters and cigarettes in their pocket get lung cancer. We’re saying it’s the cigarettes, you’re saying it’s the lighter. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
×
×
  • Create New...