Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 1 minute ago, phypon said: What are you talking about? You won't say when you got your last booster or how many you've gotten? Did you get any? I didn't get the vax. I'm a pure blood. Shocking! Pure blood - wow... I've had 4 total. The last being in 2023 with the updated vax. Doing fine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Shocking! Pure blood - wow... I've had 4 total. The last being in 2023 with the updated vax. Doing fine... You didn't get the 2024 one?? Get your booster! Do your part! I'll be surprised if you are here in 5 years. Also, I think you are full of chit. I don't think you got one. Prove the science!! 8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Shocking! Pure blood - wow... I've had 4 total. The last being in 2023 with the updated vax. Doing fine... Oh, and how many times have you had covid? Serious question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 12 minutes ago, phypon said: ou didn't get the 2024 one?? Get your booster! Do your part! I'll be surprised if you are here in 5 years. Also, I think you are full of chit. I don't think you got one. Thanks for the advice. I'm deciding the optimal time to start drawing social security. Are you an actuary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Thanks for the advice. I'm deciding the optimal time to start drawing social security. Are you an actuary? How many times have you had covid? Maybe you missed it in my last quote because the software combined multiple posts. Again, serious question. I'll check back in a bit. Going to do some target practice with some whiskey, a cigar, some chewing tobacco, and listen to some Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh reruns from the early 2000's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 13 minutes ago, phypon said: How many times have you had covid? Maybe you missed it in my last quote because the software combined multiple posts. Again, serious question. I'll check back in a bit. Going to do some target practice with some whiskey, a cigar, some chewing tobacco, and listen to some Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh reruns from the early 2000's. Stay away from Ten High. It's rot gut. I'm alive and healthy. Lots of docs aren't: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071333/#:~:text=From March 2020 through December 2021%2C there were 4511 deaths,to 84 years (Table). Edited June 5 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 12 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Absolutely...and solidly differentiated the quacks from the scientists (although that was very clear on this forum before covid). https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8058247/Donald-Trump-tweets-GOP-physician-banning-Anthony-Fauci-5-shows.html?ITO=applenews this POS was a huge proponent of HCQ but yesterday told everyone he was correct on Covid all along. The R chair of the committee is a podiatrist who purports to be a "surgeon" from his time at Abu Graib (sp?). (Who knew so many abused prisoners needed urgent foot care?). These shills are embarrassments to their profession as would be "Doc" if he really had an MD diploma...They're no better than MTG railing against one of the worlds most respected experts in Infectious Disease. They're worse tho because they know that science is the basis of medicine and still contend that it's evil. MAGA's need a villain. Science will do just fine. It's elitist don't you know... You're so dumb you swallowed the load they fed you like a good little stooge. You were denying that it came from a lab claiming "that's not how it works." LOL! Edited June 5 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 38 minutes ago, Doc said: You're so dumb you swallowed the load they fed you like a good little stooge. You were denying that it came from a lab claiming "that's not how it works." LOL! Show me the data doc. You seem to have mystical knowledge of Covid’s origins. You r truly special😅 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Show me the data doc. You seem to have mystical knowledge of Covid’s origins. You r truly special😅 LOL! There was never any "mystical knowledge" needed. Just common sense. If a virus breaks out in a city that has a lab studying it (and as most of us knew from the beginning, being engineered in it)...it's from the lab until proven otherwise. And so far nothing has proven otherwise ("show me the data" indeed). You guys just had to deny it because Trump said it was from the lab. That's the most unsciencey thing ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Show me the data doc. You seem to have mystical knowledge of Covid’s origins. You r truly special😅 Ask him about hydroxichloroquine! He's a doctor alright. Of bs. I still see idiots on X, which is an absolute cesspool, advocating hdc and ivermectin. Despite studies now being complete showing no efficacy. These people developed immunity alright. To facts. To reality. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 3 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Ask him about hydroxichloroquine! He's a doctor alright. Of bs. I still see idiots on X, which is an absolute cesspool, advocating hdc and ivermectin. Despite studies now being complete showing no efficacy. These people developed immunity alright. To facts. To reality. At least it was an attempt to try and fight a disease with no known treatment at the time, moron. Meanwhile idiots like you bought the "it's so dangerous, we can't use it" and "Trump made it up because he once owned stock in it" lines from people who didn't want it to be used and possibly work. Edited June 5 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Just now, Doc said: LOL! There was never any "mystical knowledge" needed. Just common sense. If a virus breaks out in a city that has a lab studying it (and as most of us knew from the beginning, being engineered in it)...it's from the lab until proven otherwise. And so far nothing has proven otherwise ("show me the data" indeed). You guys just had to deny it because Trump said it was from the lab. That's the most unsciencey thing ever. Unscientific doc. And it’s not. But you certainly have the chops to outguess 4 of 6 federal agencies. Of course, you believe they’re all part of the conspiracy. What was the goal. To f up China’s economy worse than ours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: Unscientific doc. And it’s not. But you certainly have the chops to outguess 4 of 6 federal agencies. Of course, you believe they’re all part of the conspiracy. What was the goal. To f up China’s economy worse than ours? So wait, you're still saying it didn't come from the lab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Doc said: At least it was an attempt to try and fight a disease with no known treatment at the time, moron. Meanwhile idiots like you bought the "it's so dangerous, we can't use it" line from people who didn't want it to be used and possibly work. Why would anyone want it to fail? Real clinicians wanted it to work but were obligated to wait and see better data. Yeah doc, data. Science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Doc said: At least it was an attempt to try and fight a disease with no known treatment at the time, moron. Meanwhile idiots like you bought the "it's so dangerous, we can't use it" line from people who didn't want it to be used and possibly work. I'm cool with trying new things to fight covid, drink all the bleach you want. I'm not cool with acting like they work before we know they do. Which is what most imbeciles from your side of the aisle did. Deny that anf you are lying. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: I'm cool with trying new things to fight covid, drink all the bleach you want. I'm not cool with acting like they work before we know they do. Which is what most imbeciles from your side of the aisle did. Deny that anf you are lying. He does that, just so you know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why would anyone want it to fail? Real clinicians wanted it to work but were obligated to wait and see better data. Yeah doc, data. Science. Yes because we had all the time in the world to wait and see if this safe drug would work. But sure, we were able to rush through the vaccines... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Doc said: Yes because we had all the time in the world to wait and see if this safe drug would work. But sure, we were able to rush through the vaccines... So we shoulda tried bleach and perhaps Sevin dust… it kills parasites too….and wait, I thought the whole pandemic was just a charade… Edited June 5 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 (edited) 11 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: I'm cool with trying new things to fight covid, drink all the bleach you want. I'm not cool with acting like they work before we know they do. Which is what most imbeciles from your side of the aisle did. Deny that anf you are lying. Why? It was a safe drug that hundreds of millions of people had used since its creation 70 years earlier. What was the downside? There wasn't a single other treatment available, there was empirical evidence it worked and time was of the essence. Why did imbeciles from your side of the aisle lie about it being dangerous? Did you stop to ask yourself that question? Edited June 5 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 37 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: So we shoulda tried bleach and perhaps Sevin dust… it kills parasites too….and wait, I thought the whole pandemic was just a charade… I was prescribed ivermectin years ago, in a cream form to treat rosacea. Worked like a charm. Fascinating reason why. And yes, we all have them, but it only causes problems in some people and often from time to time. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/25/multimedia/bugs-halloween-kids-ar-ul.html Face Mite These scaly microscopic mites live in the hair follicles and oil glands of your face. (Two face mite species are found just on humans. Lucky us). We don’t know what they’re eating exactly — it could be our oils, skin cells or microbes — but it’s enough to keep them content for their entire lives (a few weeks). “I like to think of them as grazers,” Dunn says. Face mites mostly move around your face during the night because they don’t like bright light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted June 5 Author Share Posted June 5 8 hours ago, Doc said: Why? It was a safe drug that hundreds of millions of people had used since its creation 70 years earlier. What was the downside? There wasn't a single other treatment available, there was empirical evidence it worked and time was of the essence. Why did imbeciles from your side of the aisle lie about it being dangerous? Did you stop to ask yourself that question? Great question… Even if people disagreed with using iverctin for treating Covid, there was really no reason to try to convince people it was dangerous (by referring to it as a horse de-wormer) and purposely not distinguishing between the animal medicine and the human medicine… The constant bashing and misrepresentation of the drug seemed disingenuous, and driven by ulterior motives…Ironically, it helped to contribute to vaccine hesitancy, as the msm’s criticism of ivermectin did not seem rational, and many saw through it, especially with the heightened pharmaceutical ads sponsoring the news networks…👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts