Shaw66 Posted May 11, 2021 Posted May 11, 2021 23 minutes ago, ngbills said: I would agree with this. And it can be viewed as being negative or being positive. On one you can say they did not do enough to get better NOW. But on the other is that we are already in position to sustain what started last year and this offseason helps that be 3+ years out as well. You're right about positive or negative. Some people here, and in the league, subscribe to the theory that you build to make a run at the Lombardi, and then you rebuild. Hard to say whether that approach is right or wrong, but it's clear McBeane aren't following that model. Their model is that they will keep adding good players, and in order to win the coaches and the players have to continue to improve at coaching and playing.
BADOLBILZ Posted May 11, 2021 Posted May 11, 2021 1 hour ago, Billl said: Mahomes crapped himself to the tune of 300 yards, 3 TDs, and no turnovers for a 117 QB rating against the Patriots. Now I’ll grant you that he was confused by the NE defense in the first half, but he adjusted and put up 31 points in the second half. It’s hard to beat a team by 3 TDs when that team scores 37 points. Allen couldn’t get anything going at all until mop up time after it was 38-15 in the 4th quarter. Buffalo didn’t make any offensive adjustments because there weren’t any built into the offense. I remember being on the other end of that during the Marty Schottenheimer days. The KC offense was incredibly basic, and come playoff time, Denver was literally calling out our audibles pre-snap and pointing to where the ball was going before we even snapped the ball. Had our offense been more innovative, we could have taken advantage of their aggressiveness with option routes and such, but Elvis Grbac wasn’t capable of running a complex offense, and Paul Hackett wasn’t exactly Bill Walsh. Daboll runs a system based on a complex offense, but he’s simplified it substantially. You don’t see a lot of option routes. There aren’t a dozen different ways he disguises screen passes. He does mix up the formations a decent amount, but there aren’t a ton of shifts that confuse the defense. It’s a very vanilla version of what Brady was running in NE. It still works well because Josh has physical gifts that Brady doesn’t have, but when it’s not working, it’s not like you can just make a bunch of halftime adjustments the way Payton and Brees could or Reid and Mahomes can. I think you’ll see that develop a bit as Josh continues to learn the position. He’s still growing as a QB, and right now he still looks like an athlete playing QB at times. As the game continues to slow down for him, I think he’ll look more like a QB who happens to also be a gifted athlete. If that happens, he’s going to wear a gold jacket some day. Yep, the Chiefs absolutely crapped themselves. It was pretty standard Belichick formula when they are overmatched. They come out with a great game plan......play physical.......and watch the opponent stumble and panic themselves into a big hole. Then by the time the opponent re-gains their composure it ends up being too little, too late. The Bills offense doesn't equate at all to Marty Ball. You are simply drawing a conclusion based on a result. Or should I say "results". Both Bills/Chiefs games were abysmal performances by the Bills offense. Josh Allen isn't a slow processor and the offense isn't simplified for him.............his biggest weakness to this point has been a lack of touch on deep throws. The Colts, Ravens and Chiefs all identified that and squatted on the Bills passing offense in the playoffs. That allowed them to defend the Bills short passing game more effectively and physically. The Colts were literally the worst deep ball defense in football and on a beautiful, warm and windless day the Bills couldn't get over the top on them. It's something Allen needs to improve significantly on going forward. 2 2
billsfan89 Posted May 11, 2021 Posted May 11, 2021 7 hours ago, ganesh said: We lost the AFC Championship game because: * Their OL man handled our DL giving all the time for Mahomes to get to the receivers * Their DL man handled our OL making Josh run around for his life, taking bad sacks. * Our OL provided no help to the running game to shorten the game and take the pressure of Josh * Our DL provided no help in keeping the QB (a hurt one) under check. I think the Bills saw the issue and shored up both the lines. Their theory - Improving the lines will help fix their weakness in the Run game and getting after the QB The Bills lost the AFCCG also due to the fact that their entire receiving corps was badly hurt. I think that gets over looked. Not saying the Bills would have won had they been mostly healthy but the game would have been more competitive. 2
Big Blitz Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 I would like to play the AFC championship game again with Diggs not dealing with an oblique tear, Beasley a torn meniscus, and Davis an ankle sprain. And the refs that called the Super Bowl. 4 hours ago, billsfan89 said: The Bills lost the AFCCG also due to the fact that their entire receiving corps was badly hurt. I think that gets over looked. Not saying the Bills would have won had they been mostly healthy but the game would have been more competitive. Lol just saw this after my post. Yes, I do think that the odds we win jump to 50-50. The defense was so bad that game....yea....probably wouldn’t have mattered.
Boxcar Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 15 hours ago, Billl said: Mahomes crapped himself to the tune of 300 yards, 3 TDs, and no turnovers for a 117 QB rating against the Patriots. Now I’ll grant you that he was confused by the NE defense in the first half, but he adjusted and put up 31 points in the second half. It’s hard to beat a team by 3 TDs when that team scores 37 points. Allen couldn’t get anything going at all until mop up time after it was 38-15 in the 4th quarter. Buffalo didn’t make any offensive adjustments because there weren’t any built into the offense. I remember being on the other end of that during the Marty Schottenheimer days. The KC offense was incredibly basic, and come playoff time, Denver was literally calling out our audibles pre-snap and pointing to where the ball was going before we even snapped the ball. Had our offense been more innovative, we could have taken advantage of their aggressiveness with option routes and such, but Elvis Grbac wasn’t capable of running a complex offense, and Paul Hackett wasn’t exactly Bill Walsh. Daboll runs a system based on a complex offense, but he’s simplified it substantially. You don’t see a lot of option routes. There aren’t a dozen different ways he disguises screen passes. He does mix up the formations a decent amount, but there aren’t a ton of shifts that confuse the defense. It’s a very vanilla version of what Brady was running in NE. It still works well because Josh has physical gifts that Brady doesn’t have, but when it’s not working, it’s not like you can just make a bunch of halftime adjustments the way Payton and Brees could or Reid and Mahomes can. I think you’ll see that develop a bit as Josh continues to learn the position. He’s still growing as a QB, and right now he still looks like an athlete playing QB at times. As the game continues to slow down for him, I think he’ll look more like a QB who happens to also be a gifted athlete. If that happens, he’s going to wear a gold jacket some day. ?? Diggs and Beasley run option routes pretty frequently. What are you talking about? It's pretty simple. Josh couldn't find targets because his best receiver had a torn oblique and his second best had a broken leg. They couldn't create separation. 1
dave mcbride Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 16 hours ago, Billl said: Mahomes crapped himself to the tune of 300 yards, 3 TDs, and no turnovers for a 117 QB rating against the Patriots. Now I’ll grant you that he was confused by the NE defense in the first half, but he adjusted and put up 31 points in the second half. It’s hard to beat a team by 3 TDs when that team scores 37 points. Allen couldn’t get anything going at all until mop up time after it was 38-15 in the 4th quarter. Buffalo didn’t make any offensive adjustments because there weren’t any built into the offense. I remember being on the other end of that during the Marty Schottenheimer days. The KC offense was incredibly basic, and come playoff time, Denver was literally calling out our audibles pre-snap and pointing to where the ball was going before we even snapped the ball. Had our offense been more innovative, we could have taken advantage of their aggressiveness with option routes and such, but Elvis Grbac wasn’t capable of running a complex offense, and Paul Hackett wasn’t exactly Bill Walsh. Daboll runs a system based on a complex offense, but he’s simplified it substantially. You don’t see a lot of option routes. There aren’t a dozen different ways he disguises screen passes. He does mix up the formations a decent amount, but there aren’t a ton of shifts that confuse the defense. It’s a very vanilla version of what Brady was running in NE. It still works well because Josh has physical gifts that Brady doesn’t have, but when it’s not working, it’s not like you can just make a bunch of halftime adjustments the way Payton and Brees could or Reid and Mahomes can. I think you’ll see that develop a bit as Josh continues to learn the position. He’s still growing as a QB, and right now he still looks like an athlete playing QB at times. As the game continues to slow down for him, I think he’ll look more like a QB who happens to also be a gifted athlete. If that happens, he’s going to wear a gold jacket some day. The Bills offense is the opposite of simple. And Beasley runs a ton of option routes! There are articles about it and everything, including a paywalled one from The Athletic. Here’s one from Cover 1: https://www.cover1.net/cole-beasley-option-routes-josh-allens-development-buffalo-bills/. You may want to retract this particular opinion. 1
machine gun kelly Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 On 5/11/2021 at 7:38 AM, HOUSE said: We did sign a new punter, Hawk-eye WE WANT SOMETHING ELSE! I couldn’t let you have all the fun House. How’s you’re leg. Hawkeye can fix it.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 16 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: The Bills offense doesn't equate at all to Marty Ball. You are simply drawing a conclusion based on a result. Or should I say "results". Both Bills/Chiefs games were abysmal performances by the Bills offense. Josh Allen isn't a slow processor and the offense isn't simplified for him.............his biggest weakness to this point has been a lack of touch on deep throws. Agree with the first sentences. Deep throws are a gap, but IMO we were hindered last season by missing John Brown (and having him not be himself when he came back). Davis isn't fast enough. McKenzie can't track the ball well enough. Diggs can play deep - he certainly did in 2019 'sota - but when Allen was under duress, the Bills wound up playing him on short to intermediate routes along with Beas (see Pitts game). They tried Brown in that role when he lacked his top-end speed coming back but he can't get open against physical coverage. IMO part of the Bills plan in signing Sanders is to have someone else they can put in that "short stuff" role to free Diggs to go deep. Whether that's a Good Plan or not remains to be seen. I don't know that I'd agree that it's his biggest weakness either. IMO Allen's biggest weakness is refusing to take what the defense offers him. They can offer him Motor or a TE in the flats with a 15 yd cushion and he'll be trying to find Diggs or Davis deep. Here's Josh passing chart off NFL next gen stats for last season. To my point, he is average or better on deep balls, and way below average on passes to the L in the flat. 16 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: The Colts, Ravens and Chiefs all identified that and squatted on the Bills passing offense in the playoffs. That allowed them to defend the Bills short passing game more effectively and physically. The Colts were literally the worst deep ball defense in football and on a beautiful, warm and windless day the Bills couldn't get over the top on them. It's something Allen needs to improve significantly on going forward. I think this is a bit of a simplified and revisionist picture - not that I fundamentally disagree Allen's deep ball wasn't the strength the Bills had hoped. But field position plays into it. (Also need to define what's "deep" mean to you for meaningful debate) Here are the Bills drive starts in the Colts game: The TD drive on the 2nd possession kicked off with a 36 yd pass to Diggs with no YAC. Most folks call that a deep ball. The TD drive on the 5th possession of the 1st half kicked off with a 37 yd shoestring sideline catch to Gabe Davis. Most folks call that a deep ball. Couple plays later another shoestring catch for 19 yds, technically not a deep pass but close. When you're backed up inside your own 10 yd line, it's generally hard to have the time to let deep balls develop. This is what Josh's passing looked like for the entire game. Most people would call a bunch of these deep passes. Did he miss a couple shots, yes, he did, but at 74% completion overall, not too many. The Ravens game, of course, was played in a windstorm and it's a point that Josh couldn't complete a deep ball:
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 I don't know if we should be trusting Allen's 'in game' judgment, after finding out he paid $800K for a pad in West Seneca...😇 * (I'm joking. There are more than a few that will legitimately make that argument. 🙄)
Nihilarian Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 First off, didn't Brandon Beane just win NFL executive of the year in 2020? Beane was a rookie GM in 2017 and hired AFTER that draft in April...that is, after the entire scouting staff and GM were fired just after that draft. When Beane traded with Carolina for Kelvin Benjamin, I rejoiced! I really liked Kelvin in the draft and he played well in his rookie year. Perhaps Beane thought the Bills coaches could get him to return to his rookie form...and instead Ben fell on his face. Stuff happens with players. Star has been a anchoring force on that D line and was really missed in 2020. Speaking of anchors, how on earth could Beane know that giving an extension In August to a pro bowl, stalwart force at Center like Eric Wood would result in him needing to retire (due to a neck injury) at the end of the season physical in January? You keep picking on a guy who is arguably the very best GM this franchise has ever seen... and that includes Bill Polian! IMHO Think Josh Allen! Next, Bills fans keep talking about the Bills receivers being injured in that AFC Championship game. They were! There were also other issues. What bothers me is the way the offense looked in the playoffs! After beating the Dolphins 56-26 in the last regular season game. While knocking them out of the playoffs. The Buffalo offense against the Colts, Ravens, Chiefs looked somewhat abysmal compared to what they looked like in the regular season, IMO. Bills OC Brian Daboll started his end of season vacation after that Miami game... That Ravens playoff game! Baltimore didn't even blitz like they had in the past which was to the tune of 65% of the defensive snaps (Allen getting sacked 6x in 2019)! That vaunted Bills high powered scoring offense was held to 10 points for that 2020 playoff game. Not because the Ravens defense was shutting them down either...more like the Bills shot themselves in the foot over and over. Buffalo 16 rushes for 32 yards, no receptions for the Beez and only two targets for him. In the AFC Championship game the Chiefs were holding the Bills receivers like crazy. Announcer, Tony Romo cited it as "sticky defense". Then the Chiefs attempted to get away with that against the Bucs in the SB, the Refs kept flagging them for holding. Same thing with the Chiefs O line. KC in the SB, 11 penalties for 120 yards. It will be interesting to see what happens this season with the Chiefs and Bucs. 2
TheBeaneBandit Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 16 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: Yep, the Chiefs absolutely crapped themselves. It was pretty standard Belichick formula when they are overmatched. They come out with a great game plan......play physical.......and watch the opponent stumble and panic themselves into a big hole. Then by the time the opponent re-gains their composure it ends up being too little, too late. The Bills offense doesn't equate at all to Marty Ball. You are simply drawing a conclusion based on a result. Or should I say "results". Both Bills/Chiefs games were abysmal performances by the Bills offense. Josh Allen isn't a slow processor and the offense isn't simplified for him.............his biggest weakness to this point has been a lack of touch on deep throws. The Colts, Ravens and Chiefs all identified that and squatted on the Bills passing offense in the playoffs. That allowed them to defend the Bills short passing game more effectively and physically. The Colts were literally the worst deep ball defense in football and on a beautiful, warm and windless day the Bills couldn't get over the top on them. It's something Allen needs to improve significantly on going forward. Totally agree. While I'm personally stoked we landed Rousseau, I would have loved Terrence Marshall to give Josh a big target to aid that progression. Maybe the WR who went to IR with the shoulder surprises but we shall see.
BADOLBILZ Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Agree with the first sentences. Deep throws are a gap, but IMO we were hindered last season by missing John Brown (and having him not be himself when he came back). Davis isn't fast enough. McKenzie can't track the ball well enough. Diggs can play deep - he certainly did in 2019 'sota - but when Allen was under duress, the Bills wound up playing him on short to intermediate routes along with Beas (see Pitts game). They tried Brown in that role when he lacked his top-end speed coming back but he can't get open against physical coverage. IMO part of the Bills plan in signing Sanders is to have someone else they can put in that "short stuff" role to free Diggs to go deep. Whether that's a Good Plan or not remains to be seen. I don't know that I'd agree that it's his biggest weakness either. IMO Allen's biggest weakness is refusing to take what the defense offers him. They can offer him Motor or a TE in the flats with a 15 yd cushion and he'll be trying to find Diggs or Davis deep. Here's Josh passing chart off NFL next gen stats for last season. To my point, he is average or better on deep balls, and way below average on passes to the L in the flat. I think this is a bit of a simplified and revisionist picture - not that I fundamentally disagree Allen's deep ball wasn't the strength the Bills had hoped. But field position plays into it. (Also need to define what's "deep" mean to you for meaningful debate) Here are the Bills drive starts in the Colts game: The TD drive on the 2nd possession kicked off with a 36 yd pass to Diggs with no YAC. Most folks call that a deep ball. The TD drive on the 5th possession of the 1st half kicked off with a 37 yd shoestring sideline catch to Gabe Davis. Most folks call that a deep ball. Couple plays later another shoestring catch for 19 yds, technically not a deep pass but close. When you're backed up inside your own 10 yd line, it's generally hard to have the time to let deep balls develop. This is what Josh's passing looked like for the entire game. Most people would call a bunch of these deep passes. Did he miss a couple shots, yes, he did, but at 74% completion overall, not too many. The Ravens game, of course, was played in a windstorm and it's a point that Josh couldn't complete a deep ball: 1) I agree about Brown. I said in-season the threat of his speed was missed. My hope is also that Sanders is the guy catching the 8 yard passes in front of the sticks and taking all those hits instead of Diggs...........and that Stefon is utilized more vertically like he was in Minnesota. Completely on the same page there.........I just would like to see a bigger, faster Z long term. 2) And sure, Allen is technically average on long throws.......which isn't good enough for a player with his skillset either.........but as @dave mcbride has also pointed out many times he can throw on a rope what qualifies as a deep ball for most. The Allen TD throw to Diggs at the end of the Arizona game is a prime example. That is a near impossible throw for some but a sweet spot for him. That ability statistically masks the issue. On deeper air throws....or just going over the top.....he throws a flat and inaccurate ball. +40 yards in the air should be a thing for the strongest armed QB in the NFL. But they are not. He's among the worst in that small subset........but it's meaningful for him because his range is effectively capped by the lack of RAC potential in his deeper throws. If you are defending Aaron Rodgers a 30 yard air throw to Adams is liable to hit a receiver in stride and lead to a 50 yard house call if you are squatting.......so you are going to give extra space. Not just on 3rd down.......all day. This is why it's, IMO, the biggest obstacle left for Allen as a thrower. His check down throws to the left.......that would be nice to fix and shouldn't be a challenge.......but the lesser impact of those on a per play basis makes them the lesser of two weaknesses. 3) The take regarding teams not respecting the Bills deep ball in the playoffs is of course a simplification of the overall issues......more than 1 adjustment was made.....but it's anything but revisionist. It was a next-gen stat theme heading into the Colts game.......worst deep ball defense in the entire NFL against a dynamic offense........that wasn't good at the deep ball. And true to form......despite ideal passing conditions........ the Bills couldn't exploit the Colts greatest weakness and the game turned into a real contest. The fear of the deep ball is getting beaten with a long throw that ends up in the endzone. The occasional long throw that turns into a contested type or no-YAC play in the middle of the field is not the same. Teams didn't respect the Bills over the top in the playoffs, which tightened up the coverage underneath. The Ravens played the Bills a lot like they had the year before.........their technique created opportunities for the Bills to hit a bunch big plays deep in both games and when they tried to exploit it they were just wasted downs. Weather played a factor but I don't think they changed their gameplan because of the wind. They also had great success letting Allen misfire on deep throws in the 2019 game. 2
GoBills808 Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: 3) The take regarding teams not respecting the Bills deep ball in the playoffs is of course a simplification of the overall issues......more than 1 adjustment was made.....but it's anything but revisionist. It was a next-gen stat theme heading into the Colts game.......worst deep ball defense in the entire NFL against a dynamic offense........that wasn't good at the deep ball. And true to form......despite ideal passing conditions........ the Bills couldn't exploit the Colts greatest weakness and the game turned into a real contest. The fear of the deep ball is getting beaten with a long throw that ends up in the endzone. The occasional long throw that turns into a contested type or no-YAC play in the middle of the field is not the same. Teams didn't respect the Bills over the top in the playoffs, which tightened up the coverage underneath. The Ravens played the Bills a lot like they had the year before.........their technique created opportunities for the Bills to hit a bunch big plays deep in both games and when they tried to exploit it they were just wasted downs. Weather played a factor but I don't think they changed their gameplan because of the wind. They also had great success letting Allen misfire on deep throws in the 2019 game. Allen was like 4/4 with a TD in the Colts game throwing the ball 25+ yards downfield. I think your issue is more with Daboll than Allen.
Billl Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 4 hours ago, dave mcbride said: The Bills offense is the opposite of simple. And Beasley runs a ton of option routes! There are articles about it and everything, including a paywalled one from The Athletic. Here’s one from Cover 1: https://www.cover1.net/cole-beasley-option-routes-josh-allens-development-buffalo-bills/. You may want to retract this particular opinion. Because of a 2 year old article from before Daboll simplified the offense? Nah
dave mcbride Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 32 minutes ago, Billl said: Because of a 2 year old article from before Daboll simplified the offense? Nah Seems to me they actually expanded the option route menu in 2020. But don't take my word for it -- I'll let Beasley himself deliver the words: “It was an option route,” Beasley said. "We’ve worked on that. It was a new add this offseason. We worked on it a lot. I’m glad we finally hit one." https://buffalonews.com/sports/bills/analysis-josh-allens-elite-arm-cole-beasleys-savvy-keyed-winning-drive/article_55b7f81e-011b-11eb-9295-9b393d487c9f.html And more, also from 2020: No quarterback’s gotten better faster than Allen. Two plays showed that Sunday. One: Mid-third-quarter, Buffalo ball, third-and-goal from the Rams’ 4-yard line. From Allen’s left, his go-to guy, Stefon Diggs, is singled by the Rams’ best corner, Jalen Ramsey. At the snap, Ramsey appears to gamble that the throw will be a typical throw in this part of the field, a “pylon” throw, to the front or back pylon, so he clings to Diggs. I thought Ramsey would have used the sideline to help him while cutting off the front side of the throw. But Diggs turned in and Allen, under extreme pressure, flicked his wrist, the ball landing right in Diggs’ gut. Allen had a split-second to see—for whatever reason—that Ramsey would be giving up the middle of the field, and Allen, about to get creamed, took it. “An option route, and Stefon won, and I gave him a ball where he could go get it,” Allen said. Bills, 28-3. Two: Late fourth. Rams have come all the way back to lead, 32-28. Third-and-22 at the Buffalo 31. You could feel it slipping away for the Bills, after a big Ram sack and an Allen incompletion. Next play: “Me and Cole [Beasley], we’ve talked about this route many a time,” Allen said. Beasley’s job: find a hole in the defense. https://sports.nbcsports.com/2020/09/28/two-plays-that-prove-josh-allen-has-become-a-great-nfl-qb/ And vs. SF this year, which discusses Beasley's option routes: https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2020/12/10/22166642/all-22-analysis-how-the-buffalo-bills-offense-outschemed-the-san-francisco-49ers-josh-allen. And the capper, which isn't about option routes but about how much of a challenge the Bills' scheme presents to opponents: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/film-room/2021/film-room-buffalo-offense 1 1
BADOLBILZ Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 2 hours ago, GoBills808 said: Allen was like 4/4 with a TD in the Colts game throwing the ball 25+ yards downfield. I think your issue is more with Daboll than Allen. No, it's Allen. I'd like to see them go to a more vertical passing offense eventually, but Daboll can't justify dialing up the shots if Allen doesn't put air under the throws and deliver with touch and timing necessary to stretch the defense. At this point he can throw thru the defense, but not over it. It's an important distinction. I understand it's lost on some but I've been thru that on TSW here before. When Chan Gailey's horizontal passing offense got figured out (by the Jets) and teams stopped worrying about Bills WR's running past them and jammed the underneath passing lanes..........fans on TSW insisted that it wasn't because teams didn't think Fitz could throw the deep ball........after all he had hoisted a 75 yard bomb to TO a couple years earlier. Yeah, he could throw the ball that far, but he couldn't command 15+ yard throws outside the numbers and defense's recognized it. Chan was cleverly covering up Fitz arm weakness by keeping the longer yardage throws in the middle of the field(where they were actually much shorter). Think David Nelson over the middle. The more difficult NFL throws.....outside the numbers for instance......he had to throw his whole body into them and that lead to inconsistent mechanics and accuracy. Eventually, after a lot of fighting with me the concept was grasped here on TSW when the media started talking about it.........but before that time even the distinction of how far you could throw the ball and command/control of that throw were not considered entirely different things by the TSW fanbase. The issue with Allen is even more unusual. He didn't grow up with a lot of high end instruction and because of his incredible arm he developed a habit of throwing everything hard. He never learned to put air under the ball because he didn't have to. But the NFL is different. Windows are tighter and learning how to put air under the ball and deliver it with timing and accuracy that way is a huge weapon to have. I know he worked on it last season with Jordan Palmer and I am sure he is working on it now. I think he can master it..........but it doesn't come natural to him. Becoming proficient at it will take a lot of wear and tear off of him and his WR's going forward. I compare it to LeBron James having to learn to shoot the 3 after years of just running thru and over weaker competition. He needed to become a proficient long range shooter to take the beating off of his body and extend his career. 1 1
GunnerBill Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 23 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Interesting that several veteran players, including John Brown and Diggs, as well as our FO (Beane etc) have referenced how complicated the Bills offense is. There may be some other explanations than "the Bills offense is pretty simple and Daboll dumbed it down for Josh" Yea.... the Bills offense is pretty simple is one of the most obviously false statements on this board. 1 1
Arm of Harm Posted May 18, 2021 Author Posted May 18, 2021 On 5/11/2021 at 9:10 AM, Shaw66 said: Arm - Nice summary. I have a couple of reactions. One is that the solutions are long-term, not short-term. The Bills probably will get some help from the new people they've added, but the real impact of those people in the problem areas is likely not to be seen for a couple of seasons. The edge rushers probably will see the field in 2021 but like Epenesa, they will be expected to be large contributors in 2022. Anything more than that is a bonus. Same with the three offensive linemen - not likely to be impact players in year on. As I've said in other places, I think your analysis of Edmunds is incorrect. Edmunds wasn't regularly getting "fooled" in pass coverage. Edmunds was getting optioned. Teams began developing route trees that left Edmunds with two guys to cover over the middle - when he chose one, the QB threw the other way. It wasn't an Edmunds weakness; it was a defensive design weakness. It will be addressed in coaching - how well remains to be seen. Edmunds has his weaknesses, but he is pretty consistent in executing his assignment. He isn't Superman - he can't be in two places at one time. I have some reactions to your reactions. 1) I love to see the emphasis on long-term over short-term. We had short-term, quick fix type thinking during Tom Donahoe, during Marv's time as GM, during the Whaley/Ryan years. Such thinking resulted in the Bills using a lot of early draft picks on first-contract-and-out DBs and RBs. I'm glad those days are over! 2) In support of point 1), there are those who believe that the Bills' window to win a Super Bowl will last only as long as Allen's rookie contract. I disagree. I believe our window lasts however long he continues playing like a franchise QB. Some years the breaks won't go your way. In the AFC Championship Game, the Bills were playing with every WR hurt, and with a bad officiating crew which let KC get away with a lot. Maybe a different year the breaks will go the Bills' way. The best approach is to give yourself as many realistic chances as possible to win the Super Bowl, and hope that at least one of those chances pans out. A long-term approach accomplishes that. 3) As frustrating as it is to have opposing defenses only put 6 men in the box, the Bills were not a RB away from winning that AFC Championship Game. Without a better effort from the defense victory would have been all but impossible, no matter how well the offense had done. As you point out, a big part of the problem was scheme. That said, it was great to see the Bills address their biggest player weakness on defense (the defensive line) in the draft. 4) You are very knowledgeable about football, and your analysis of Edmunds is more likely to be correct than mine. 5) Go Bills! 1
Meatloaf63 Posted May 18, 2021 Posted May 18, 2021 On 5/11/2021 at 6:36 AM, JGMcD2 said: Would have been quite interesting to see what would have happened had the refs seen Jones punch Feliciano... they saw it and chose to ignore it along with all the defensive holding. During the SB they decided to call it👍 2
BigAl2526 Posted May 19, 2021 Posted May 19, 2021 The Bills are counting on low level additions (Rachad Wildgoose, Nick McCloud and Olaijah Griffin) and development of one young player (Dane Jackson) to add competition to the cornerback position. I think most of us as fans were hoping for a bit more commitment from the Bills to upgrading the spot across from Tre White. They could also get some help from more pressure from the D-line, but a QB like Tom Brady (whom the Bills will play) that gets rid of the ball in only a couple seconds or a Pat Mahomes (whom the Bills will play ) who makes unscripted plays all over the lot while moving around will likely still give the Bills' secondary fits. I do like Dane Jackson, and I think he may have more upside than Levi Wallace, a good technician who's always going to be athletically limited.
Recommended Posts