Jump to content

Biden creates an economic crisis--Unemployment, Inflation, risk of STAGLFATION increasing


Recommended Posts

Just now, Tiberius said:

The coup plot has been reported everywhere. There are trials going on

 

MAGA is so corrupt and dishonest

Reads like more blue anon.  

 

Turn off the TV.  Leave the echo chamber.  Go outside.  

 

You are doing what you claim maga is. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The coup plot has been reported everywhere. There are trials going on

 

MAGA is so corrupt and dishonest

Trump's gonna getcha...

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh, I don't know, maybe a coup or something....

You don't know? Maybe the Biden administration's current impersonation of Soviet era justice can be employed to drum up some charges, then round up, convict, and sentence the perpetrators before they act?  If it works on high profile Presidential candidates it can certainly be applied to common MAGA enemies of The State.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You don't know? Maybe the Biden administration's current impersonation of Soviet era justice can be employed to drum up some charges, then round up, convict, and sentence the perpetrators before they act?  If it works on high profile Presidential candidates it can certainly be applied to common MAGA enemies of The State.

Trump committed a crime and is being held accountable. You are theb one who wants him above the law, soviet style

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The coup plot has been reported everywhere. There are trials going on

 

MAGA is so corrupt and dishonest

blue anon.

 

40 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Creating scarcity and increasing the costs of goods by 60% is one hell of a formula

people and families having disposable incomes drives growth and natural economy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

blue anon.

 

people and families having disposable incomes drives growth and natural economy.

 

 


Not when they’re paying 50% more for imported goods because it’s not 1945 anymore and it’s a global economy 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Trump committed a crime and is being held accountable. You are theb one who wants him above the law, soviet style

Its here now and we clearly witnessed Soviet style justice in action. Show me the man and I'll find a crime. Success! Perhaps it's too much reality to handle but you need to be aware that its actually you that not only wants it but needs it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Its here now and we clearly witnessed Soviet style justice in action. Show me the man and I'll find a crime. Success! Perhaps it's too much reality to handle but you need to be aware that its actually you that not only wants it but needs it.

Trump is just a criminal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Tibs is correct. The Stormy Daniel’s story would’ve killed him in 2016 with women except MAGA hags. 

That sounds like a political crime and show trial. Which is what most Americans think because regardless of what you want to believe most of them are not so stupid.

 

Once again try to comprehend this, its not illegal to conceal the existence of a NDA or its terms and conditions of the agreement. There's no legal requirement to disclose the existence of such an agreement. And timing of any voluntary disclosure is not relevant to the law. And campaign funds were not used. Most important, FEC and other Federal authorities with jurisdiction over Presidential elections concluded campaign law was not violated or applicable but NYS would hear none of that, and took it upon themselves to do it even though NYS does not enforce Federal election law, and the judge denied the defense expert witness testimony. How was that ruling impartial? Meanwhile Daniels was allowed to testify about the affair which had nothing to do with the payment process. To put the show in the show trial.

 

But regardless the charges identified no victim and there was no claim of loss of anything material or non-material by the actions of the defendant. NYS claimed no damages, the banks claimed no damages but rather as a witness for the defense.

 

If you guys want to go with the "crimes against the State" route then okay but it sounds eerily similar to heavy handed Soviet style justice. Or maybe present day North Korea or Iran. Take your pick

 

All these points will be made when an appeal overturns the conviction. But I expect you know that already.

12 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Who was the victim of the Hunter Biden “scandal”

What does the indictment say?

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That sounds like a political crime and show trial. Which is what most Americans think because regardless of what you want to believe most of them are not so stupid.

 

Once again try to comprehend this, its not illegal to conceal the existence of a NDA or its terms and conditions of the agreement. There's no legal requirement to disclose the existence of such an agreement. And timing of any voluntary disclosure is not relevant to the law. And campaign funds were not used. Most important, FEC and other Federal authorities with jurisdiction over Presidential elections concluded campaign law was not violated or applicable but NYS would hear none of that, and took it upon themselves to do it even though NYS does not enforce Federal election law, and the judge denied the defense expert witness testimony. How was that ruling impartial? Meanwhile Daniels was allowed to testify about the affair which had nothing to do with the payment process. To put the show in the show trial.

 

But regardless the charges identified no victim and there was no claim of loss of anything material or non-material by the actions of the defendant. NYS claimed no damages, the banks claimed no damages but rather as a witness for the defense.

 

If you guys want to go with the "crimes against the State" route then okay but it sounds eerily similar to heavy handed Soviet style justice. Or maybe present day North Korea or Iran. Take your pick

 

All these points will be made when an appeal overturns the conviction. But I expect you know that already.

What does the indictment say?

it's a crime to book the payoff as a legal expense.  it was a campaign expense.  you just said that.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...