Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

It is NOT one person.

 

The Left is in complete control of the party.

 

Speak of moderation on any issue (abortion, crime, immigration) and you are no longer tolerated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While I agree left is in control across the board right now across the board, I really need someone to explain to me why two people screw and science happens that  then a mother that doesn’t want her kid should bear it anyway. Do we think that child has a great future in this overpopulated world of already neglected children? 

Parents are literally tossing their kids over a fence right now 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Disagree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

While I agree left is in control across the board right now across the board, I really need someone to explain to me why two people screw and science happens that  then a mother that doesn’t want her kid should bear it anyway. Do we think that child has a great future in this overpopulated world of already neglected children? 

Parents are literally tossing their kids over a fence right now 

Pro-life without exception is an unsustainable position to still have in 2021. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, The Governor said:

Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Doug Jones of Alabama, and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

 

 

Bob Casey WAS 14 years ago, he had to change because of the democrat peer pressure that I mentioned.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/02/casey-abortion-pennsylvania-midterms-689505

 

 

Doug Jones is NOT pro-life

 

In the Sept. 27 MSNBC interview, host Chuck Todd asked Jones about abortion.

Jones said he's a "firm believer that a woman should have to freedom to choose what happens to her own body" and that he opposed a ban on abortions after the 20th week of gestation, which is a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and now under consideration in the Senate.

Alabama law allows abortions to be performed as late as 22 weeks into a pregnancy.

"I'm not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman's right and her freedom to choose," 

https://www.al.com/news/huntsville/2017/11/doug_jones_speaks_on_abortion.html

 

 

Joe Manchin  as he does with ALL things tries to play the middle The only point I will concede is that he doesn't bow to the democrat narrative on anything,

but he certainly does nNOT vote straight pro-life no matter what he calls himself.

 

Abortion. Manchin identifies as "pro-life." He has mixed ratings from both abortion-rights and anti-abortion movements political action groups.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Manchin

 

 

Try, try again, you either follow the democrat stance on abortion (like the good Catholics, Biden & Pelosi) or you don't advance.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

While I agree left is in control across the board right now across the board, I really need someone to explain to me why two people screw and science happens that  then a mother that doesn’t want her kid should bear it anyway. Do we think that child has a great future in this overpopulated world of already neglected children? 

Parents are literally tossing their kids over a fence right now 

Republicans only want them born, what happens after that is not considered.  Sure there's many good conservative people that will adopt children, but they don't realize that what they have now is a ditch.  They don't see that it would make their ditch become Niagara Falls.  The reason they can't face that fact is because the good book leads them beyond reason.  Think Mexican migrant child crisis times 10 million.  Surely no one would use a coat hangar, right?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Consider Reading a book named freakanomics @B-Man

 

provided a perspective on the topic I’d never considered. Two stat professors that were just looking at social data. 
 

also helpful for other real like exercises like home sales. 

 

 

I did read it back around 2008.

 

 

But I might just pick it up again.

 

Thanks.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Republicans only want them born, what happens after that is not considered.  Sure there's many good conservative people that will adopt children, but they don't realize that what they have now is a ditch.  They don't see that it would make their ditch become Niagara Falls.  The reason they can't face that fact is because the good book leads them beyond reason.  Think Mexican migrant child crisis times 10 million.  Surely no one would use a coat hangar, right?

There is no worse way to start off in this world than that the only two people

that are most likely to unconditionally love you don’t. After that turning out as an occasional felon is probably the median. 

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Bob Casey WAS 14 years ago, he had to change because of the democrat peer pressure than I mentioned.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/02/casey-abortion-pennsylvania-midterms-689505

 

 

Doug Jones is NOT pro-life

 

In the Sept. 27 MSNBC interview, host Chuck Todd asked Jones about abortion.

Jones said he's a "firm believer that a woman should have to freedom to choose what happens to her own body" and that he opposed a ban on abortions after the 20th week of gestation, which is a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and now under consideration in the Senate.

Alabama law allows abortions to be performed as late as 22 weeks into a pregnancy.

"I'm not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman's right and her freedom to choose," 

https://www.al.com/news/huntsville/2017/11/doug_jones_speaks_on_abortion.html

 

 

Joe Manchin  as he does with ALL things tries to play the middle The only point I will concede is that he doesn't bow to the democrat narrative on anything,

but he certainly does nNOT vote straight pro-life no matter what he calls himself.

 

Abortion. Manchin identifies as "pro-life." He has mixed ratings from both abortion-rights and anti-abortion movements political action groups.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Manchin

 

 

Try, try again, you either follow the democrat stance on abortion (like the good Catholics, Biden & Pelosi) or you don't advance.

 

 

 

 

 

PSA Chuck Todd is a sniveling doosche. Tim Russert would never would have approved of this. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Bob Casey WAS 14 years ago, he had to change because of the democrat peer pressure than I mentioned.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/02/casey-abortion-pennsylvania-midterms-689505

 

 

Doug Jones is NOT pro-life

 

In the Sept. 27 MSNBC interview, host Chuck Todd asked Jones about abortion.

Jones said he's a "firm believer that a woman should have to freedom to choose what happens to her own body" and that he opposed a ban on abortions after the 20th week of gestation, which is a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and now under consideration in the Senate.

Alabama law allows abortions to be performed as late as 22 weeks into a pregnancy.

"I'm not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman's right and her freedom to choose," 

https://www.al.com/news/huntsville/2017/11/doug_jones_speaks_on_abortion.html

 

 

Joe Manchin  as he does with ALL things tries to play the middle The only point I will concede is that he doesn't bow to the democrat narrative on anything,

but he certainly does nNOT vote straight pro-life no matter what he calls himself.

 

Abortion. Manchin identifies as "pro-life." He has mixed ratings from both abortion-rights and anti-abortion movements political action groups.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Manchin

 

 

Try, try again, you either follow the democrat stance on abortion (like the good Catholics, Biden & Pelosi) or you don't advance.

 

 

 

 

 

I’m not concerned with what they may say on any given day. All 3 of them have “voted” for Republican led life bills. Ben Sasse had one not that long ago.

 

For most Americans, it’s no longer an important issue. If you’re still voting on abortion, you’re likely still wearing Cavaricci and parachute pants.

Edited by The Governor
  • Disagree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

There is no worse way to start off in this world than that the only two people

that are most likely to unconditionally love you don’t. After that occasional felon is probably the median. 

 

Since 1973 there have been 186 abortions for every 1000 live births(62 million), and consider this number is exponential.  Are you really saying there isn't 100 million loving Christians families in the US willing to take these poor souls???  

Posted
2 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Since 1973 there have been 186 abortions for every 1000 live births(62 million), and consider this number is exponential.  Are you really saying there isn't 100 million loving Christians families in the US willing to take these poor souls???  

For me you’re talking past the sale But I don’t celebrate abortion as a good thing. To be considerate of others I consider it an acceptable tragedy.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, The Governor said:

I’m not concerned with what they may say on any given day. All 3 of them have “voted” for Republican led life bills. Ben Sasse had one not that long ago.

 

 

Link?

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

For me you’re talking past the sale But I don’t celebrate abortion as a good thing. To be considerate of others I consider it an acceptable tragedy.  

You're right, but no one is pro-abortion.  Thats a misnomer.  I'm still trying to understand why Hillary would allow abortions when those are babies she could have drank the blood of and eaten.  Seriously though, it's not a "good" thing, we all know that, but reality tells the real story.  It's simply not feasible, which makes it a non-issue for anyone living in reality.  

Posted
1 minute ago, daz28 said:

You're right, but no one is pro-abortion.  Thats a misnomer.  I'm still trying to understand why Hillary would allow abortions when those are babies she could have drank the blood of and eaten.  Seriously though, it's not a "good" thing, we all know that, but reality tells the real story.  It's simply not feasible, which makes it a non-issue for anyone living in reality.  

Especially fetuses! Those are a delicacy in some circles. 
 

laughs in George Soros….

Posted
1 minute ago, The Governor said:

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

 

That's just being a human being.  And why partial birth abortions should be outlawed.

Posted
25 minutes ago, The Governor said:

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

 

 

1 vote in 2 decades.........lol.

 

and that was against closure of the bill.

 

Well short of the sixty votes needed.

 

Let me know when they vote pro-life when it counts.

 

Irregardless, the party keeps it members in lock step, much more than the GOP.

 

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, daz28 said:

You're right, but no one is pro-abortion.  Thats a misnomer.  I'm still trying to understand why Hillary would allow abortions when those are babies she could have drank the blood of and eaten.  Seriously though, it's not a "good" thing, we all know that, but reality tells the real story.  It's simply not feasible, which makes it a non-issue for anyone living in reality.  

Ha Hilly and Billy were aborting full term adults like Vince Foster lol

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...