Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, UKBillFan said:

 

As much as I like Basham and Brown inparticular as individual players (I have doubts about Rousseau) it feels like our front office has been taken over by Green Bay's - focus on defense and don't give the QB much in way of additional support.

 

And even Green Bay has managed to draft a WR this year.

Do we need a WR? I can argue a RB or TE but it wasn't their, we did what we needed to do.

Posted
2 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

As much as I like Basham and Brown inparticular as individual players (I have doubts about Rousseau) it feels like our front office has been taken over by Green Bay's - focus on defense and don't give the QB much in way of additional support.

 

And even Green Bay has managed to draft a WR this year.

 

Right, because getting the qb Diggs, Beasley, Sanders, Davis and Mckenzie is no support. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

Didnt realize wgr was covering the draft, wish i had that on.

 

 

Sorry.  Should have spoke up.  Beane said Brown will be a swing tackle.  I am sure he is the RT of the future.

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Weatherman said:


I’m a big fan of building the trenches but we haven’t drafted a starter yet IMHO.  That’s frustrating!! 

 

Seems they are drafting players with significant upside that may be contributors this year and take over as a starter next year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Weatherman said:


I’m a big fan of building the trenches but we haven’t drafted a starter yet IMHO.  That’s frustrating!! 

Our starters are already here. Everyone is pissed about other teams filling their squads as "starters" with unproven rookies for their holes. We will properly develop our guys and make them starters when it's warranted.  I get it, been a super long time since the early 90's, we are doing fine. 

Edited by Real McNasty
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Big Turk said:

 

Seems they are drafting players with significant upside that may be contributors this year and take over as a starter next year.

 

And high RAS. They love that metric. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

As much as I like Basham and Brown inparticular as individual players (I have doubts about Rousseau) it feels like our front office has been taken over by Green Bay's - focus on defense and don't give the QB much in way of additional support.

 

And even Green Bay has managed to draft a WR this year.


Drafts not over, WR is deep on our roster this year and deep in the draft this year. Wouldn’t be surprised to see two WR in our final 4 picks

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Motorin' said:

 

Right, because getting the qb Diggs, Beasley, Sanders, Davis and Mckenzie is no support. 

 

And Knox in his third year. And Breida. And whatever else we can add via trade and further free agency signings. 

 

But didn't you hear? That 3rd round WR that we didn't draft is a guaranteed future Hall of Famer!! 🙄

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Real McNasty said:

Our starters are already here. Everyone is pissed about other teams filling their squads as "starters" with unproven rookies. We will properly develope or huys and make them starters when it's warranted.  I get it, been a super long time since the early 90's, we are doing fine. 

People forget having a team stacked with talent you draft quality back ups who will start in the future.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

 

Filling the Ty Nsekhe void.  Sounds wasteful to some, but you have to have those guys.  Bonus points for potential development into stud.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Real McNasty said:

Do we need a WR? I can argue a RB or TE but it wasn't their, we did what we needed to do.

Agreed, plus they still have Hodgins who is a is an unknow to us at this point and they did pick up Breida who does bring more speed to the team.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo Barbarian said:

Beane just said they had a deal to trade back out of the second round but decided not to because they liked Basham that much.

 

 

That sounds vaguely familiar.

Posted

Beane had a trade in place with an NFC team to trade 61 for a 3rd rounder and other pick(s) with the condition Basham wasn't there at 61

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Right, because getting the qb Diggs, Beasley, Sanders, Davis and Mckenzie is no support. 

 

On paper it looks great but take Diggs out of the game and we look weak. Admittedly, Beasley was playing with an injury at the end of last year so hopefulluy he'll be returning fit and firing.

 

Our running game can easily be exposed, though - think I would have preferred taking Carter or Gainwell in the third though, as I said, as an individual player I do like the idea of Brown.

Edited by UKBillFan
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...