Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Victory Formation said:

There will never be another one like him. No one will ever break his all time sack record. No one.

True. But give Reggie White the extra 47 games to match Bruce and White leaves him in the dust.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, HOUSE said:

 

Bruce would be asking for a billion dollars ...lol

The Bills need to clone him ASAP, the Pegs have the coin to do it...

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:

True. But give Reggie White the extra 47 games to match Bruce and White leaves him in the dust.

White was a LDE on a 4 man front.  Bruce was a RDE on a 3 man front.  Line white up against the pass-blocking tackle, without 2 DT's to pluck off the guards and his numbers are ???

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Utah John said:

You can make the case that OJ was the first victim of cancel culture.  His football achievements were conspicuously ignored due to the fact that he was a vicious, brutal knife murderer.  There is even talk that his name should come off the Bills' ring of honor.  Not recognizing his achievements -- the only RB to get 2000 yards in a 14 game season, dominating the league for three or four years as the obvious MVP -- can only be due to people not wanting to honor a killer that way.  But that's not what this list was about. 

 

So what's the cut off? Is there one? When does a person's off field actions affect his on field performance? A "brutal knife murderer" doesn't yet meet the qualification? Does anything then? What about rape? What about blowing up the Federal Building? Or flying airplanes into the World Trade Center? Should any off field actions by a player affect what he did previously on the field? If Osama Bin Laden ran for 2000 yards should he be on the Wall of Fame? What about Hitler? I'm just trying to figure out if killing and nearly decapitating 2 people is not enough to warrant some kind of censure then what does warrant it?  What about child molestation? Nothing at all justifies your so called "cancel culture?"  

Posted
2 hours ago, BringMetheHeadofLeonLett said:

White was a LDE on a 4 man front.  Bruce was a RDE on a 3 man front.  Line white up against the pass-blocking tackle, without 2 DT's to pluck off the guards and his numbers are ???

Lol.

Like serious Lol.

Posted
15 hours ago, Utah John said:

I have no idea how good Chuck Bednarik was so I have no opinion on ranking him there.  But Bradshaw ahead of Simpson?  NO WAY.  As the article mentions, it was the tremendous Steelers defense that won all those championships.  Bradshaw (the original TB12) was a good QB, but there is NO WAY he surpassed what Simpson did.  There's far too much emphasis on winning championships in ranking individual players. 

 

You can make the case that OJ was the first victim of cancel culture.  His football achievements were conspicuously ignored due to the fact that he was a vicious, brutal knife murderer.  There is even talk that his name should come off the Bills' ring of honor.  Not recognizing his achievements -- the only RB to get 2000 yards in a 14 game season, dominating the league for three or four years as the obvious MVP -- can only be due to people not wanting to honor a killer that way.  But that's not what this list was about.  

 

 

I agree with some of this. You'd have to think that there have been more than four first overall picks who've been better football players than Terry Bradshaw. Bradshaw had the benefit of playing on a run-oriented team with a great offensive line and two Hall of Fame WRs. If you'd put Drew Bledsoe on a team like that, he would have accomplished a lot as well.

 

That said, the argument against O.J. is longevity. If you define a "good" season for a RB as rushing for at least 1000 yards while achieving at least 4.0 yards per carry, O.J. had five good seasons. Adjust for the fact that he only played 14 game seasons instead of 16, and it's still just five good seasons. All the players who made their list provided much more than just five good seasons.

 

"Cancel culture" is normally defined as globalist billionaires using money and power to cancel ideological content they don't like. O.J.'s decision to murder his ex-wife and her boyfriend was ideologically neutral. It was not an attempt to contradict the belief system being spread by globalist billionaires.

Posted
18 hours ago, CorkScrewHill said:

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-best-nfl-draft-picks-ever-peyton-manning-headlines-list-of-best-no-1-overall-picks-in-history/

it is amazing to think we had one of the all-time greats who started out rather rough .. but as the article states “In the 13 seasons from 1986 to 1998, Smith hit the double-digit sack mark a total of 12 times and the only reason he didn't make it a perfect 13 is because he missed 11 games in 1991 due to a knee injury. ” the season he was suspended he got 12 sacks in 12 games. Favorite Bruce story not mentioned in the article was a comment from an opposing quarterback who was lamenting how he hated playing Bruce as Bruce would eat raw  Garlic before the game and if he sacked the qb he would lay on him and breath into the quarterbacks face mask .. that will make someone nervous :)

Bruce was damn good his rookie year.I think the weight issue that he had distracted people from his performance.yes he improved when he lost weight but you could still see that he had enormous potential.

17 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

Best DE of all time, best Buffalo Bill of all time.

OJ

Posted
1 hour ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Lol.

Like serious Lol.

 

I think he made a fair point.  Producing that many sacks as a 3-4 DE is insane, especially considering that the Bills' front 7 was a little undersized for a 3-4.  

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

I think he made a fair point.  Producing that many sacks as a 3-4 DE is insane, especially considering that the Bills' front 7 was a little undersized for a 3-4.  

Sure. But nothing suggests that Bruce would have done any better playing Whites position. Nothing.

 

The fact of the matter is White played Almost 3 fewer seasons worth of games and finished with 2 fewer sacks.

 

So, it’s arguable White was the better DE . 
 

White - .853 sacks/game

Smith - .717

 

Kind of a large difference.

Edited by Jay_Fixit
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Sure. But nothing suggests that Bruce would have done any better playing Whites position. Nothing.

 

The fact of the matter is White played Almost 3 fewer seasons worth of games and finished with 2 fewer sacks.

 

So, it’s arguable White was the better DE . 
 

White - .853 sacks/game

Smith - .717

 

Kind of a large difference.

 

Oh for sure it's arguable.  I think your point is equally fair about sacks per game.  

 

I'd only add that if White played Bruce's position, nothing suggests that White would have done any better than Bruce, but I think it's arguable White's production per game would have gone down as a 3-4 DE.  

Posted
5 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said:

True. But give Reggie White the extra 47 games to match Bruce and White leaves him in the dust.

Longevity definitely factors into it though my friend. 

Posted
10 hours ago, HOUSE said:

 

Bruce would be asking for a billion dollars ...lol

 

He made me crazy asking for a new contract, right after he got a new contract, just because somebody else got a new contract. Best Bills player of all time IMO, but I would have let him sit. I’m just “that way”, I guess. Still love the guy, though. 

×
×
  • Create New...