Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

I was hoping to watch this yesterday, hopefully get some time today. Russell's political view is that all governments are bad and that people should govern themselves. In the past that would have made him a left wing hippie but somehow that now makes him far right apparently lol

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

I was hoping to watch this yesterday, hopefully get some time today. Russell's political view is that all governments are bad and that people should govern themselves. In the past that would have made him a left wing hippie but somehow that now makes him far right apparently lol

Horseshoe theory is now reality.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Wow this was even better than I expected and I already had high hopes. Amazing stuff. All of you dummies arguing about which side is better have a listen because the answer is neither side.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

How many people interviewed Putin after the invasion? 


Right - pretty much every network (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN). No one claimed those reporters were "traitors" for talking to Putin... because those were controlled assets guaranteed to edit, spin, and "report" in the way the USIC wanted them to. 

 

The backlash then, and now, against Tucker is because (at least in theory) he's not a USIC controlled asset who will toe the company line and spin any answer in such a way that paints Putin as the devil. 

 

Why? 

 

Because the USIC doesn't trust Americans to think for themselves and form their own conclusions - especially when it comes to a sacred scare cow like Putin who've they've spent the past 10+ years building up as the most evil person this side of Trump. 

 

What's happening right now is a very good window into how the machine works. And all the people who are decrying Tucker as a traitor - especially those in the media sphere - should be remembered and rightfully shamed and ignored from here on out. Those civilians who parrot their talking points should also take a beat and rethink why they feel so strongly that talking to a world leader - especially one who's at the fulcrum point of an ongoing shooting war in Europe - is such a sin. 

 

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Turk said:

Cognitive Dissonance is real.

Don't waste another minute of your weekend engaging those idiots.  Their brains are fried from TDS.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Freedom of the press by communists.

 

 

 

Not surprisingly, Bill Kristol's comment goes way, way over the heads of "the people's pundit" (whoever he is) and our very own copypasta pals.

Here he's parroting Trump's Muslim Ban - the very scholarly "until we find out what's going on" should have been a clue.

3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Don't waste another minute of your weekend engaging those idiots.  Their brains are fried from TDS.  

I remain, in the famous words of Tommy Boy, a Cognitive Dissident.

(That one would've been clever if it had been on purpose...)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

How many people interviewed Putin after the invasion? 


Right - pretty much every network (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN). No one claimed those reporters were "traitors" for talking to Putin... because those were controlled assets guaranteed to edit, spin, and "report" in the way the USIC wanted them to. 

 

The backlash then, and now, against Tucker is because (at least in theory) he's not a USIC controlled asset who will toe the company line and spin any answer in such a way that paints Putin as the devil. 

 

Why? 

 

Because the USIC doesn't trust Americans to think for themselves and form their own conclusions - especially when it comes to a sacred scare cow like Putin who've they've spent the past 10+ years building up as the most evil person this side of Trump. 

 

What's happening right now is a very good window into how the machine works. And all the people who are decrying Tucker as a traitor - especially those in the media sphere - should be remembered and rightfully shamed and ignored from here on out. Those civilians who parrot their talking points should also take a beat and rethink why they feel so strongly that talking to a world leader - especially one who's at the fulcrum point of an ongoing shooting war in Europe - is such a sin. 

 

 

 

 

.


Deranged Rhino is proud of you Bonnie. 
 

We all know you didn’t writer this on your own.

 

Lastly:

 

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

How many people interviewed Putin after the invasion? 


Right - pretty much every network (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN).


Can you post the links to these interviews?

 

Thanks 

15 minutes ago, Turk said:

Cognitive Dissonance is real.


Didn't mean to trigger you, precious

 

11 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Don't waste another minute of your weekend engaging those idiots.  Their brains are fried from TDS.  


TDS owns you.

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, B-Man said:

Right - pretty much every network (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN). No one claimed those reporters were "traitors" for talking to Putin...


Why the F do you lie all the time?

 

Why can’t you back this claim up Bonnie? 
 

Whats the delay Bonnie?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 hours ago, B-Man said:

pretty much every network (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN). No one claimed those reporters were "traitors" for talking to Putin... because those were controlled assets guaranteed to edit, spin, and "report" in the way the USIC wanted them to. 


Why won’t Bonnie share those videos and reports of those networks interviewing Putin?

 

×
×
  • Create New...