BillsFanNC Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 Needs posting again and every single ***** day. Vivek with the grand slam knockout punch to every single liberal !@#$stain from PPP all the way to the swamp. 1 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Needs posting again and every single ***** day. Vivek with the grand slam knockout punch to every single liberal !@#$stain from PPP all the way to the swamp. And then they appropriately get arrested, prosecuted and jailed.
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 1 minute ago, redtail hawk said: And then they appropriately get arrested, prosecuted and jailed. Few dispute that. What is disputable is the hypocracy and selective enforcement where others attacking Federal facilities and officers, rioting, looting, destroying public and private property, and committing acts of violence against other citizens and law enforcement got a free pass from Democratic administration's throughout the country because the violence helped the party leading up to the 2020 election. And by magic it all suddenly stopped when party leaders found it was counter-productive to the cause. That's the problem most liberals turn a blind eye to and refuse to acknowledge. That makes it comical when they cite the rule of law. But only when it's convenient. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Few dispute that. What is disputable is the hypocracy and selective enforcement where others attacking Federal facilities and officers, rioting, looting, destroying public and private property, and committing acts of violence against other citizens and law enforcement got a free pass from Democratic administration's throughout the country because the violence helped the party leading up to the 2020 election. And by magic it all suddenly stopped when party leaders found it was counter-productive to the cause. That's the problem most liberals turn a blind eye to and refuse to acknowledge. That makes it comical when they cite the rule of law. But only when it's convenient. Please give specific examples. Many rioters that became thugs at the BLM protests were prosecuted and jailed. Thugs are thugs. I suspect that all the people listening to this song dispute that. It would appear more than a few. https://www.forbes.com/video/6323032955112/trump-hits-no-1-with-justice-for-all-song-made-with-jan-6-arrestees/?sh=4ffbec46153c Edited July 15, 2023 by redtail hawk
SoCal Deek Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 1 hour ago, redtail hawk said: Please give specific examples. Many rioters that became thugs at the BLM protests were prosecuted and jailed. Thugs are thugs. I suspect that all the people listening to this song dispute that. It would appear more than a few. https://www.forbes.com/video/6323032955112/trump-hits-no-1-with-justice-for-all-song-made-with-jan-6-arrestees/?sh=4ffbec46153c Where are the months and months of highly produced hearings for those who attacked the White House and physically assaulted the officers protecting it? I must have missed them while I was busy watching the government paint the street in their honor.
The Frankish Reich Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: Where are the months and months of highly produced hearings for those who attacked the White House and physically assaulted the officers protecting it? I must have missed them while I was busy watching the government paint the street in their honor. Republicans control the House. They can have hearings on whatever they want. Go for it. Or shut up about it. 1
Doc Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 45 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Republicans control the House. They can have hearings on whatever they want. Go for it. Or shut up about it. We know it's inconvenient for you to hear it, regardless of whether Repubs want to put on a dog and pony show.
The Frankish Reich Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 3 minutes ago, Doc said: We know it's inconvenient for you to hear it, regardless of whether Repubs want to put on a dog and pony show. So ... there are two possible reasons for why the House isn't planning all those promised hearings. 1. They are afraid they'd backfire. Hearings would simply amplify the ultra-right voices in the House that are, quite frankly, an embarrassment to the party. 2. They really don't have any kind of smoking gun to present. So ... yes, put up or shut up.
SoCal Deek Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 55 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Republicans control the House. They can have hearings on whatever they want. Go for it. Or shut up about it. You want them to hold hearings NOW? Come on Frank. I expect much much more from you.
The Frankish Reich Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You want them to hold hearings NOW? Why not? What better time than when you control the House? I have said that there ought to be Hunter Biden hearings. And I mean it. There is enough there to probe - publicly - what Joe knew and when he knew it.
SoCal Deek Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Why not? What better time than when you control the House? I have said that there ought to be Hunter Biden hearings. And I mean it. There is enough there to probe - publicly - what Joe knew and when he knew it. What would the hearings be about? Is there some big dispute over what happened? No there isn’t. The J6 hearings were also about nothing and proved nothing. Im not arguing for MORE hearings. I’m arguing for LESS. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Is there some big dispute over what happened? Of course there is! Biden Crime Family proponents say he was getting a cut of Hunter's illicit deals. Biden supporters say there's no proof of any such thing. Put on your evidence! And if Hunter's guilty plea is accepted (it will be), he presumably won't have a 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. Let's get it on! 1
SoCal Deek Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 24 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Of course there is! Biden Crime Family proponents say he was getting a cut of Hunter's illicit deals. Biden supporters say there's no proof of any such thing. Put on your evidence! And if Hunter's guilty plea is accepted (it will be), he presumably won't have a 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. Let's get it on! You’ve lost me here. I was talking about holding hearings on the attack on the White House! You’re talking about the Biden Crime Syndicate.
Doc Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 (edited) 57 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: What would the hearings be about? Is there some big dispute over what happened? No there isn’t. The J6 hearings were also about nothing and proved nothing. Im not arguing for MORE hearings. I’m arguing for LESS. Yeah, hearings are a colossal waste of time. Nothing was done as a result of J6 and nothing would be done as a result of any hearing the Repubs would hold about what happened 3 years ago. Edited July 15, 2023 by Doc 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 16, 2023 Posted July 16, 2023 19 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: What would the hearings be about? Is there some big dispute over what happened? No there isn’t. The J6 hearings were also about nothing and proved nothing. Im not arguing for MORE hearings. I’m arguing for LESS. "Where are the months and months of highly produced hearings for those who attacked the White House and physically assaulted the officers protecting it?" Confused. What were you asking for here? I assumed you wanted the insurrectionists to have a public voice such as in a hearing. 43 minutes ago, SCBills said: And they'll listen...Pence stopped their attempt to steal an election. They're angry and resentful. Exactly the milieu that Ole Tuck works best in.
Recommended Posts