Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, SCBills said:

Tucker’s viral speech from over the weekend.  
 

Can this be said by a cable news host?

 

Can this be the type of rallying cry for a future President?

 

Are these the views of a man who wants to embark on his own media empire?

 

Maybe all… but I do believe the answers to those questions are: 

 

No

 

Yes

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

Is he talking about election lies?  Normally I don’t view your cartoons or watch any of your videos because, how do I say this nicely . . . They are stupid.  So I can only assume that Tucker has a little self-loathing thing going on here.  Sad. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

Was this before or after a trove of emails revealed he was using his platform to peddle a number of opinions that he personally finds laughable?  Dude has spent his entire career in the media and cashed checks from CNN, MSNBC, and Fox for the last 23 years yet you guys want to paint him as some outsider and "dissident".  Tucker will do and say whatever he is paid to do and has gotten extremely rich selling you the outrage du jour.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
1 hour ago, Jauronimo said:

Was this before or after a trove of emails revealed he was using his platform to peddle a number of opinions that he personally finds laughable?  Dude has spent his entire career in the media and cashed checks from CNN, MSNBC, and Fox for the last 23 years yet you guys want to paint him as some outsider and "dissident".  Tucker will do and say whatever he is paid to do and has gotten extremely rich selling you the outrage du jour.

BINGO. His mouth wrote a check that Fox decided they  didnt want to  cover. So he was bounced.

 

If there is one certain fact that both sides I think agree with is this: If you want to get to the crux and root of a problem follow the Money. Always follow the money. It leads to the cold hard truth. Always.

 

If he decides to run for president a lot of people would vote for him. Lets see how quickly he could assemble a  political war chest.

 

I would love to see him debate the donald. lol what a spectacle that would be. Who would lose their mind first and go the lowest first.... POPCORN READY. 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, SCBills said:

 

So damn delusional...The guy would tell his audience that Mexicans were responsible for Covid if his audience had already been primed to believe it by some conspiracy cult.  He's not anti establishment.  He's pro ole tuck and his bank account and investments.  And he's a serial liar with no regard for the health and prosperity of the nation.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

So damn delusional...The guy would tell his audience that Mexicans were responsible for Covid if his audience had already been primed to believe it by some conspiracy cult.  He's not anti establishment.  He's pro ole tuck and his bank account and investments.  And he's a serial liar with no regard for the health and prosperity of the nation.


Only cable news host to go after the FBI

 

Only cable news host to go after the CIA

 

Only cable news host to go after the CDC

 

 Only cable news host to go after the FDA

 

Only cable news host to utterly humiliate members of both parties

 

Only cable news host to oppose the war in Ukraine

 

I can’t get in Tucker’s head to see what he truly believes, but his entire post-covid journey has been nothing but a f**k you to those in power.   I 100% believe you have never watched him, because if you did .. you’d see the only cable news host who brought on independent journalists and far left progressives to find common ground on issues of abuse and the consolidation of power in our federal government. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Only cable news host to go after the FBI

 

Only cable news host to go after the CIA

 

Only cable news host to go after the CDC

 

 Only cable news host to go after the FDA

 

Only cable news host to utterly humiliate members of both parties

 

Only cable news host to oppose the war in Ukraine

 

I can’t get in Tucker’s head to see what he truly believes, but his entire post-covid journey has been nothing but a f**k you to those in power.   I 100% believe you have never watched him, because if you did .. you’d see the only cable news host who brought on independent journalists and far left progressives to find common ground on issues of abuse and the consolidation of power in our federal government. 

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/04/tucker-carlson-long-con-fox-news-trump/

and yes, I watched the weak tea "special" he aired about the "peaceful Jan 6 protest" after the radical R congress critters released some meaningless footage to him exclusively.

 

"As I write, we don’t yet know all the details of what led Fox to toss cash-cow Carlson to the curb. But one thing is certain: It wasn’t for his perversion and poisoning of the national political discourse. That was his raison d’etre at Fox.  He was no truth-teller. He was a pro-MAGA, for-mega-profit propagandist. Carlson’s personal journey is a tale of the Trump era. Like the GOP, he was already on the path to right-wing demagoguery before Trump oozed down that escalator. As those dark political winds grew stronger, he eagerly raised the sails and exploited the Trumpfication of the Republican Party and the conservative movement. But by ending up a Fox cast-off whose phoniness has been thoroughly exposed, Carlson has finally provided something of a public service. He has both emblemized and revealed the fundamental truth of the network: We distort, and we divide. No journalist could have done that better."

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/04/tucker-carlson-long-con-fox-news-trump/

and yes, I watched the weak tea "special" he aired about the "peaceful Jan 6 protest" after the radical R congress critters released some meaningless footage to him exclusively.


You really just responded with a Mother Jones article?

 

Hold up, let me rebut with something from Breitbart. 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, SCBills said:


You really just responded with a Mother Jones article?

 

Hold up, let me rebut with something from Breitbart. 

The author, David Corn, knew and worked around ole tuck so yes, I consider his perspective salient:

"He was the Washington editor for The Nation[5] and has appeared regularly on FOX News, MSNBC, National Public Radio, and BloggingHeads.tv. He joined Mother Jones in 2007.[4] Corn appeared on FOX News more than sixty times, according to a tally by Politifact.com, before becoming a commentator on MSNBC.[6]

In February 2013, Corn was given the 2012 George Polk Award in journalism in the category of political reporting for his posting of a video and reporting of the "47 percent story," Republican nominee Mitt Romney's videoed meeting with donors during the 2012 presidential campaign.[7]"

 

So rebut away.   And cite the bonafides of the author you quote.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, SCBills said:


You really just responded with a Mother Jones article?

 

Hold up, let me rebut with something from Breitbart. 

 

another @redtail hawk classic.  

 

He'll just come back with something from SPLC.

 

:lol:

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

The author, David Corn, knew and worked around ole tuck so yes, I consider his perspective salient:

"He was the Washington editor for The Nation[5] and has appeared regularly on FOX News, MSNBC, National Public Radio, and BloggingHeads.tv. He joined Mother Jones in 2007.[4] Corn appeared on FOX News more than sixty times, according to a tally by Politifact.com, before becoming a commentator on MSNBC.[6]

In February 2013, Corn was given the 2012 George Polk Award in journalism in the category of political reporting for his posting of a video and reporting of the "47 percent story," Republican nominee Mitt Romney's videoed meeting with donors during the 2012 presidential campaign.[7]"

 

So rebut away.   And cite the bonafides of the author you quote.


The entire article is him pontificating and wondering out loud based on grievances he has against Tucker.  
 

Why on earth is that the article you decided to come at me with?

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, SCBills said:


The entire article is him pontificating and wondering out loud based on grievances he has against Tucker.  
 

Why on earth is that the article you decided to come at me with?

Couldn't care less about you.  Going after Carlson as I have many times before he was fired.  He was a dangerous, lying opportunist who misled and influenced millions of stupid people.   Fox thought enough of Corn's opinions to have him on 60 times.  But perhaps you can post something from Catturd or some other star far right "writer".

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

Couldn't care less about you.  Going after Carlson as I have many times before he was fired.  He was a dangerous, lying opportunist who misled and influenced millions of stupid people.   Fox thought enough of Corn's opinions to have him on 60 times.  But perhaps you can post something from Catturd or some other star far right "writer".


Go through my posting history.   You know I don’t post stuff like that.   Which is why I’m able to condescendingly reference Breitbart as you post Mother Jones articles.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

According to VF, Tucker's speech at Heritage that had "religious overtones" ultimately prompted Fox's decision.

 

The world is fine with talk of faith when it is soft and toothless. It is the faith that recognizes acts as good and evil that offends them.

 

 

Tucker Carlson’s Prayer Talk May Have Led to Fox News Ouster: “That Stuff Freaks Rupert Out”

 

5007.jpg?width=465&quality=85&dpr=1&s=no

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04/tucker-carlson-fox-news-rupert-murdoch

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

According to VF, Tucker's speech at Heritage that had "religious overtones" ultimately prompted Fox's decision.

 

The world is fine with talk of faith when it is soft and toothless. It is the faith that recognizes acts as good and evil that offends them.

 

 

Tucker Carlson’s Prayer Talk May Have Led to Fox News Ouster: “That Stuff Freaks Rupert Out”

 

5007.jpg?width=465&quality=85&dpr=1&s=no

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04/tucker-carlson-fox-news-rupert-murdoch


Absolutely wild, if true. 
 

The one I truly hope is the reason, is the reporting that Murdoch’s fiancé called Tucker a “messenger from God” at a dinner they all had together recently. 

 

Shortly after, Murdoch broke up with her.  Now Tucker is gone. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SCBills said:


Absolutely wild, if true. 
 

The one I truly hope is the reason, is the reporting that Murdoch’s fiancé called Tucker a “messenger from God” at a dinner they all had together recently. 

 

Shortly after, Murdoch broke up with her.  Now Tucker is gone. 

The subject of God has nothing to do with Murdoch or Carlson.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

Oh wow.  Like a movie script they had this ready to go *checks watch* 24 hours after Tucker exists Fox.  
 

 

Almost like you live in the Matrix or something  where your DC - Media - UniParty complex wants everything to be an emotional soap opera where you can be more easily manipulated. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/04/tucker-carlson-long-con-fox-news-trump/

and yes, I watched the weak tea "special" he aired about the "peaceful Jan 6 protest" after the radical R congress critters released some meaningless footage to him exclusively.

 

meaningless? that footage got the shaman his freedom? i guess the sentencing judge didn't see it as dubious as you. its not suprising that there are people in this country that dismiss evidence that ultimately frees a man as what you just suggested.

 

its really sad. there are alot of people whos political bias is so deep they would rather have people rot in jail and maintain that bias then objectively say...maybe the narrative was wrong. many people were violent. i did not see footage of them on tucker. the man who picked up the trashed statues in the footage, if full footage start to finish was him being let in and peacefully cleaning up but he was charged with 20+ years terrorist action. would you be behind that persecution. why?

 

that is civil war territory friend. prosecuting political enemies and then dismissing evidence because its from someone you don't like. its flat out evil. for a group of people that ultimately came out of covid looking like fools i find it astonishing any of you can act objective or think you are on the right side of history to call any info misinformation and not care if fellow citizens are being unjustly prosecuted as you don't even consider evidence to the contrary.

 

id feel the same for antifa or blm who were being prosecuted unjustly dept on evidence uncovered. but that's just me i guess.

 

Edited by Buffarukus
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

id feel the same for antifa or blm who were being prosecuted unjustly dept on evidence uncovered.

sure you would/did...  and good luck with the civil war.  We all know that's your goal.  Winning within the rules is mine.  It's the better bet, by far...

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Dislike 1
×
×
  • Create New...