Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/23/2022 at 1:42 PM, SoCal Deek said:

I’ll buy you a dog. What kind do you want? 

Wouldn't  expose a dog to BS. That would be cruelty to animals.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

 

On 12/16/2022 at 9:21 PM, Big Blitz said:

Oh.  My.  God. 
 

 

 

 

That is dumb for even you man.  Try harder. 

Edited by nedboy7
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Serious question: Do you think Carlson actually believes 50% of the stuff he broadcasts?  cuz he's testified under oath that he doesn't.  Is he entertaining for you B?

 

 

Wow.  Serious Answer 

.

 

Because I have never heard that bolded part.

 

So. . . . . . . . . . I googled.  https://www.google.com/search?q=tucker+carlson+i+don't+believe+50+of+what+i+say+is+wrong&oq=Tucker+Carlson+I+don't+believe+50%+of+what+I+say&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j33l3.33306j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

 

and guess what gang ?

 

The Hawk is exaggerating to make a point again.  Shocker no ?

 

I was suspicious when (as usual) he didn't provide a link to his 'proclamations' 

 

He testified that he didn't believe that Trump had been cheated out of the 2020 election, so you simply extended it from there.

 

Serious question:

 

Did you listen to the 11 minute clip, before you responded discounting it ?

 

Don't bother.  The answer is obvious.

 

.

 

ADDED:

 I wanted to be fair about it, so I went back and googled "Tucker Carlson, under oath"  STILL no 50% statement.

 

 https://www.google.com/search?q=tucker+carlson+under+oath&sxsrf=AJOqlzVdo_jLqmuESLy4ziSSbSxa2gDjCg%3A1674664097808&ei=oVjRY_ntMMuoptQP_8W6kAk&ved=0a

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Wow.  Serious Answer 

.

 

Because I have never heard that bolded part.

 

So. . . . . . . . . . I googled.  https://www.google.com/search?q=tucker+carlson+i+don't+believe+50+of+what+i+say+is+wrong&oq=Tucker+Carlson+I+don't+believe+50%+of+what+I+say&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j33l3.33306j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

 

and guess what gang ?

 

The Hawk is exaggerating to make a point again.  Shocker no ?

 

I was suspicious when (as usual) he didn't provide a link to his 'proclamations' 

 

He testified that he didn't believe that Trump had been cheated out of the 2020 election, so you simply extended it from there.

 

Serious question:

 

Did you listen to the 11 minute clip, before you responded discounted it ?

 

Don't bother.  The answer is obvious.

 

.

 

ADDED:

 I wanted to be fair about it, so I went back and googled "Tucker Carlson, under oath"  STILL no 50% statement.

 

 https://www.google.com/search?q=tucker+carlson+under+oath&sxsrf=AJOqlzVdo_jLqmuESLy4ziSSbSxa2gDjCg%3A1674664097808&ei=oVjRY_ntMMuoptQP_8W6kAk&ved=0a

 

 

reading conmpehension dude.  I asked "do you believe?".  But no big deal.  Carlson didn't believe the election was stolen despite it being his primary theme for months on his propaganda show.  I dare say it was almost 50% of the show for a while...oh, and since you weren't aware of this maybe you should spend less time on twitter echo chambers and more on actual news sites.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

freading conmpahension dude.  I asked "do you believe?".  But no big deal.  Carlson didn't believe the election was stolen despite it being is primary theme for months on his propaganda show.  I dare say it was almost 50% of the show for a while...

Face it, you got called out and you lost. Making stuff up is easy when you don't get called on it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

reading conmpehension dude.  I asked "do you believe?".  But no big deal.  Carlson didn't believe the election was stolen despite it being his primary theme for months on his propaganda show.  I dare say it was almost 50% of the show for a while...oh, and since you weren't aware of this maybe you should spend less time on twitter echo chambers and more on actual news sites.

 

 

Now, now.

 

No re-writing.

 

Here is what you said.

 

45 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Serious question: Do you think Carlson actually believes 50% of the stuff he broadcasts?  cuz he's testified under oath that he doesn't.  

 

 

 

Don't expose yourself as a coward any more than you have.

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

same folks that will go after tucker non stop. seem to also be huge Rachelle Maddow fans. And ignore when her lawyers got the OAN lawsuit tossed out under the argument that her show is just commentary and any sane person would not think its news.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/06/22/judge-rules-rachel-maddows-show-isnt-news-n1456306

 

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/editorial-judge-confirms-what-most-people-know-rachel-maddow-shouldnt-be-taken-seriously-as-a-news-source/

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...