17islongenough Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 Very subtle differences but make the uniform a lot cleaner
UConn James Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 4 hours ago, Mark Vader said: Fewer stripes and more solid colors, aside from that it's not a big difference. They do look good though. I belong to a UniWatch FB page and the general consensus there is that this was a solid update. They didn’t need to do much. Nixed the white side panels and the contrasted collars that Nike for some reason makes 3-4” wide. In an ongoing trend, the shoulder numbers have disappeared. Would’ve been nice to see a white pants set that have the orange and black stripe (not just a black outline). Removed the 3D effect attempt on numbers that just looked bad. A number of teams could benefit from a few minor tweaks and simplification. It’s when they go for a fuller redo that Nike & teams swing and miss (see: TB Bucs 2015-2020).
dollars 2 donuts Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 My goodness I did love the heck out of Burrows his rookie year before he got hurt and briefly forgot he was a Bengal until this video. This conference is ridiculous when it comes to the quality of QB talent. ...ridiculous.
blacklabel Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 Overall a pretty good makeover. The numbers remind me of the Bears a little bit. Bears number font is a bit thinner but definitely similar. May Joey B throw four TDs a game unless he's playing the Bills in which case I wish for him to throw a good 14 or 15 interceptions.
Reks Ryan Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 9 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: One of the few times I liked the new look. Yes. Cause it looks like a classic style. They didn't over do it. Sometimes with new looks, it seem like someone is trying to hard to be creative.
stinky finger Posted April 19, 2021 Posted April 19, 2021 10 hours ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: Bengals, New Jerseys: Hoboken? Just classic!
Recommended Posts