BillsMafi$ Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 (edited) https://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/browns-release-dt-sheldon-richardson Edited April 16, 2021 by BillsMafi$
John from Riverside Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 I would say yes to that.....always liked Richardson 1 2
DJB Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 (edited) IVE HEARD OF HIM! BRING IN HIM IN OR FIRE BEANE!!! Edited April 16, 2021 by DJB 1 2 25 2 1
YoloinOhio Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 Is he still driving around with guns in the car like a whack job? I’m not too far from him kinda worried. 1 1 5
DCOrange Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 18 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Is he an effective NT? No, he's another 3-tech. 2
ghostwriter Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 I don’t think this would be a bad signing believe it or not. Not sure if he is a process guy though.
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 knock knock knock "Brandon!" knock knock knock "Brandon!" knock knock knock "Brandon!" 5
TheBeaneBandit Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 He's a bad mammer jammer, but probably not process material. 1
aristocrat Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 if he wants to win he can come learn the process. we want pass rush he is a sack guy 1
B-Man Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 “You're asking if he is a Sicilian Process Guy. “ The Don Coach nodded his head pleasantly, acknowledging the flattering witticism and its truth. 1
TheyCallMeAndy Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 10 minutes ago, DCOrange said: No, he's another 3-tech. We don’t really need him 🤷♂️
Governor Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: “You're asking if he is a Sicilian Process Guy. “ The Don Coach nodded his head pleasantly, acknowledging the flattering witticism and its truth. No one using dark-mode can read your posts. 1 4 1 1
BarleyNY Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 He was a great locker room guy in Cleveland and solid on the field, but he wasn’t living up to his hefty contract. As mentioned, he’s a 3-tech so no real place for him here.
Brennan Huff Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 31 minutes ago, DJB said: IVE HEARD OF HIM! BRING IN HIM IN OR FIRE BEANE!!! 2
Gambit Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, The Governor said: No one using dark-mode can read your posts. I had zero issues reading it. 1 1
Mickey Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 Normally I would say no but then I remember all those years when the Pats brought in guys like that and they turned around their careers because they were "that" team. Maybe now we are "that" team? 2
richNjoisy Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 Is this a "turn around"situation, Mickey? His stats look consistent to me. I would think as a rotational player he would be a great mix with Star. Is he not that type of player?
BornAgainBillsFan Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 Please nothing more that's going to interrupt Ed's development as a playmaking 3-tech. The Bills criticize the UofH coaching staff for playing Oliver in the 1-tech role for most of his college career, then proceed to do the exact same thing in what is year 2 of his career, arguably the most important to a player's development. I know they'll say they had no choice, due to Star's opt-out + some injuries. But I would've signed King Kong Bundy off the street to play 1-tech, before I moved Ed to there. The Bills need 1-techs in this draft, perhaps one of the top in round 2 and then another sneaky good one on day 3. Anything to make sure they never play Ed there again! 7 2
Recommended Posts