Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Farley with his trademark eyeroll. Trump doesn’t recognize right or wrong, just what he can get away with and what’s best for him. I see that as a threat. 

Good God man, what planet do you live on? You've just accurately described the Biden administration. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

Some hopeful news I never expected to read.  Speak MAGA but act middle of the road.  Great idea.

 

https://www.semafor.com/article/06/16/2023/jd-vance-the-senates-maga-dealmaker

 

“We hear from the same people. We’re working on this together. We have very few differences on it, almost none,” said Brown, Vance’s co-sponsor on rail safety. “His most important job, in my opinion, is to deliver 15 or so Republicans here.”

That job requires him to speak MAGA in the conservative media world, where Vance has been an eager attack dog. His collaboration with Brown began even after he’d taken a prominent role bashing President Biden’s response to the rail disaster and complaining that the administration was “talking about how we have too many white-male construction workers” instead of fixing it.

The railway safety bill has gotten most of the attention; it’s got the best and earliest chance of passage. But Vance has also joined forces with Minnesota Sen. Amy Kobuchar on preventing catalytic converter theft; with Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on getting guardsmen and reservists earlier access to healthcare; with Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly on speeding up manufacturing starts in rural areas; and with Warren, again, on clawing back executive compensation when banks fail.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

Why Democrats Won’t Debate Anymore

by Derek Hunter

 

If you don’t use a muscle for a while it will atrophy to the point of uselessness. The same goes for the brain, which is why it’s important to engage in mentally challenging activities every now and then – anything from reading or a game of Trivial Pursuit to watching Jeopardy or engaging in a vigorous debate.

 

That last one, by the way, is the easiest and most fun, because talking to people is fun. Liberals, however, gave up on the concept of debate a while ago, and now are incapable of it (and not just because their ideas are horrible failures).

 

Flip on MSNBC and you not only won’t see a debate, you won’t see a serious discussion. Rachel Maddow, on the rare days she works for her $30 million (tell me again about the evils of capitalism), does not speak to anyone who disagrees with her. In fact, MSNBC does not employ anyone who disagrees with the progressive orthodoxy, no matter how absurd it is. Michael Steele, the former RNC Chairman, and every other “conservative” they keep on staff to trot out to pretend to have Republicans on their network sit silently on issues like pretending boys are girls and sterilizing them. No sane person, let alone conservative, can sit silently on this absurd concept, yet silent they sit and hammer their checks.

 

NBC has a gay news platform called “NBC Out,” because news apparently has a sexuality. It appears to only hire gay reporters who, quite coincidentally (I’m sure), find ***** or trans-phobia under every rock. That might have something to do with the silence of their “Republicans,” who want to keep those checks rolling in.

 

To be fair, they also have news platforms based on race – NBC Asian-American, NBCBLK (black people news), NBC Latino, etc. – because not only did Democrats create segregation, they love it dearly to this day. The left never changes their objectives, only their tactics. Today’s racism is couched as “tolerance” and “celebrating” things that don’t matter.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2023/06/20/why-democrats-wont-debate-anymore-n2624679

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

 "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."  - Oppenheimer

 

Robert Oppenheimer was not a member of the Communist Party, but he was a "fellow traveler" who agreed with many of its goals1. New evidence has emerged that demonstrates that he had been a Communist but had not been a spy2. Oppenheimer's long-time membership in the Communist Party of the United States was made secret in 1942 because he was being used as a Soviet intelligence asset by the Communist Underground to help obtain atomic secrets

 

Will be interesting to see if Hollywood vilifies him or makes him a saint.  as much of the world sees us dropping those bombs as war crimes.

 

guessing he will be the hero

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

 "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."  - Oppenheimer

 

Robert Oppenheimer was not a member of the Communist Party, but he was a "fellow traveler" who agreed with many of its goals1. New evidence has emerged that demonstrates that he had been a Communist but had not been a spy2. Oppenheimer's long-time membership in the Communist Party of the United States was made secret in 1942 because he was being used as a Soviet intelligence asset by the Communist Underground to help obtain atomic secrets

 

Will be interesting to see if Hollywood vilifies him or makes him a saint.  as much of the world sees us dropping those bombs as war crimes.

 

guessing he will be the hero

 

 

 

 

 

 

the director said it will leave questions.  Joe McCarthy is portrayed so I expect the communist question will be addressed

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

How weird you think objecting to him giving national security information to a Chinese spy is simply "theater". Seriously don't change  you are easy to categorize and predict. 

you're confusing him with Salwell, who was not censured as far as I know.

As my link noted, this could help Schiff win a senate seat.

 

He's extremely intelligent:

"No matter how many false justifications or slanders you level against me, you but indict yourselves," Schiff said. "As Liz Cheney said, 'there will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain.'"

"This resolution attacks me for initiating an investigation into Trump campaign solicitation and acceptance of Russian help in the 2016 election even though the investigation was first led not by me, but by a Republican chairman," Schiff said in his remarks, later adding: "In short, it would accuse me of omnipotence, the leader of some vast Deep State conspiracy, and of course, it is nonsense."

Posted

LOL, this will help pencil neck liar get a senate seat.

 

Boy I miss the days the party loyalist actually held the party to standards.

 

vs just cheerleading lies and corruption cause "My team"

 

or is that like the argument that the DEMS using the DOJ to go after trump has helped trumps polling?

 

Schiff has more support outside his state, than in.  

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LOL, this will help pencil neck liar get a senate seat.

 

Boy I miss the days the party loyalist actually held the party to standards.

 

vs just cheerleading lies and corruption cause "My team"

 

or is that like the argument that the DEMS using the DOJ to go after trump has helped trumps polling?

 

Schiff has more support outside his state, than in.  

 

 

 

 

he did nothing wrong.  There is plenty of evidence in the Mueller report that the Russians aided trump's campaign and election.  Why do yo think they wanted trump to win?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-manafort-russia-polling-data-b2140727.html

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

he did nothing wrong.  There is plenty of evidence in the Mueller report that the Russians aided trump's campaign and election.  Why do yo think they wanted trump to win?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-manafort-russia-polling-data-b2140727.html

Give it up Hawk. 2016 called and they want their failed Hilary campaign back. She lost because in the end Trump out worked her. Huge self inflicted error on her part. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
×
×
  • Create New...