Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Unforgiven said:

I just almost have no words for the insanity and chaos that the ***** tard left have unleashed on this country.

Keep voting for the 'rats sheeple, soon they will have finished the job.

 

 

it just shows that there are resentful, loser nuts in all races.  we aren't so different...

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
1 hour ago, Unforgiven said:

I just almost have no words for the insanity and chaos that the ***** tard left have unleashed on this country.

Keep voting for the 'rats sheeple, soon they will have finished the job.

 

 


Nothing new sadly, the ADOS movement has been doing this for years. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Roundybout said:

 

I actually want to see people’s opinions on this here. Because I think this is blatantly unconstitutional and unamerican. 

Actually, it is constitutional.  If you paid attention in 11th grade (when the taught US History when I was a kid), If you eat to change it, you pass a constutionl amendment in Congress, (voted for by ⅔ i each house)  and have 3/4of the state legislatures ratify it within a certain time (I believe 7 years). Then it is part of the Constitution.

This is how Prohibition and it's repeal happened  and the ERA didn't become part of the Constitution.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Actually, it is constitutional.  If you paid attention in 11th grade (when the taught US History when I was a kid), If you eat to change it, you pass a constutionl amendment in Congress, (voted for by ⅔ i each house)  and have 3/4of the state legislatures ratify it within a certain time (I believe 7 years). Then it is part of the Constitution.

This is how Prohibition and it's repeal happened  and the ERA didn't become part of the Constitution.


Except right now it would violate the 15th and 26th amendments. 
 

And why are we making it hard for people to vote again? Could it be that the right wing knows it can’t win anymore so it’s only solution is to physically ban 18-25s from voting?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Except right now it would violate the 15th and 26th amendments. 
 

And why are we making it hard for people to vote again? Could it be that the right wing knows it can’t win anymore so it’s only solution is to physically ban 18-25s from voting?

yes, it's the old "you can't vote (drink) but you can fight and die" trope.  disgraceful R's.  Any group against them can't vote.  But it's not a democracy to them.  Only those on their perverse side should have a say.  Anyone on their side, including traitors, should rule...

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
21 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, it's the old "you can't vote (drink) but you can fight and die" trope.  disgraceful R's.  Any group against them can't vote.  But it's not a democracy to them.  Only those on their perverse side should have a say.  Anyone on their side, including traitors, should rule...


Some of them are saying voting at 18 would be dependent on military or police service, which is literally the plot of Starship Troopers lol

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Roundybout said:

 

I actually want to see people’s opinions on this here. Because I think this is blatantly unconstitutional and unamerican. 


Not a fan of this at all.  
 

While, politically, I’d love to raise the voting age (as I believe most 18-25 year olds that vote are more easily manipulated than our already easily manipulated electorate) I don’t think taking rights away from people is the way to go in most, if not all, aspects of life. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

Lol @ a commie whining about a PROPOSAL for a constitutional AMMENDMENT being........unconstitutional!

 

:lol:

 

@Roundybout

 

Here's your us naturalized citizen civics test study guide...

 

https://www.uscis.gov/citizenship-resource-center/civics-test-2020-version/study-for-the-test-2020-version


Aren’t I on your little “commie” ignore list, or have I penetrated your echo chamber?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Aren’t I on your little “commie” ignore list, or have I penetrated your echo chamber?

Apparently he's interested in some Characteristic, charismatic, commie comments.  Alliteration is fun!

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Wild how we still have no idea who these people are (feds) or who funds them (feds)..

 

 

c'mon .they''re Bannon fodder for progressive media.  As long as they don't hurt anyone, have at it.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
1 hour ago, SCBills said:

Wild how we still have no idea who these people are (feds) or who funds them (feds)..

 

 


Why do you think they couldn’t be right wingers?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


Why do you think they couldn’t be right wingers?


Could be, but you’re telling me none of the liberal investigative journalists have been able to find out who any of these people are, and/or, who finances them?

 

Antifa is a loosely structured group, but we know who some of the members are, who finances them and where they recruit/link up. 
 

We know nothing about this group, aside from they’re a caricature of what a liberal or fed thinks a radicalized right wing group would act like.  
 

Edited by SCBills
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
12 hours ago, SCBills said:


Could be, but you’re telling me none of the liberal investigative journalists have been able to find out who any of these people are, and/or, who finances them?

 

Antifa is a loosely structured group, but we know who some of the members are, who finances them and where they recruit/link up. 
 

We know nothing about this group, aside from they’re a caricature of what a liberal or fed thinks a radicalized right wing group would act like.  
 


Yeah, because some of the antifa chuds were arrested and we got info from that. 
 

As far as I know, none of these guys have been arrested yet. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...