Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Thanks Obama 

If he felt he could have gotten real public healthcare, he would've done it.   Unfortunately, they had to pull teeth (and perhaps a few fingernails) to get this lousy compromise of private/public done.  The end result was an abortion of policy but coverage for 10's of millions American who were uninsured. doesn't work but how are we gonna rid ourselves of the health care leaches with R connections?

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

If he felt he could have gotten real public healthcare, he would've done it.   Unfortunately, they had to pull teeth (and perhaps a few fingernails) to get this lousy compromise of private/public done.  The end result was an abortion of policy but coverage for 10's of millions American who were uninsured. doesn't work but how are we gonna rid ourselves of the health care leaches with R connections?

 

The Democrats had a majority in the HoR and the Senate and the Presidency.  All the Republicans voted against it and some Democrats and it still passed.  They could have done whatever they wanted including public option.  They chose not to and passed what they wanted to pass.

 

I knew we were doomed when they brought in the heavy lobbying insurance companies help them figure out what to do.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

If he felt he could have gotten real public healthcare, he would've done it.   Unfortunately, they had to pull teeth (and perhaps a few fingernails) to get this lousy compromise of private/public done.  The end result was an abortion of policy but coverage for 10's of millions American who were uninsured. doesn't work but how are we gonna rid ourselves of the health care leaches with R connections?


Democrats they had the votes, couldn’t get it through their own corrupt party because it’s not what they really wanted. The lobbyists had the insurance companies write the policy. 
 

My health care was awesome and cheap 20 years ago. Like usual the government stepped in and made it expensive and crappy and shockingly politicians and corporations got richer too. Like always.  
 

when will you people realize giving these idiots more control over your money and life is the wrong idea? 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

The Democrats had a majority in the HoR and the Senate and the Presidency.  All the Republicans voted against it and some Democrats and it still passed.  They could have done whatever they wanted including public option.  They chose not to and passed what they wanted to pass.

 

I knew we were doomed when they brought in the heavy lobbying insurance companies help them figure out what to do.

Yes, all true.  The D's are also motivated by lobbyist dollars altho providing insurance for 40 mil more Americans would never have been an R priority.  Hell, the R's have been trying to rescind Obamacare ever since it was passed.  Who do you think the insurance companies have more in their pockets?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

Yes, all true.  The D's are also motivated by lobbyist dollars altho providing insurance for 40 mil more Americans would never have been an R priority.  Hell, the R's have been trying to rescind Obamacare ever since it was passed.  Who do you think the insurance companies have more in their pockets?

I worked for one of the largest insurance companies on the planet when Obama won and Obamacare was passed- I assure you that the insurance industry loved Obamacare. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

I worked for one of the largest insurance companies on the planet when Obama won and Obamacare was passed- I assure you that the insurance industry loved Obamacare. 

uh huh.  and so did 40 million uninsured.  I assure you of that.

Posted
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

                                  image.png.ec25c725fd63b1edc591d66000647e

 

 

 


You guys can’t even do a boycott correctly lmfao 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Who do you think the insurance companies have more in their pockets?V

 

I would suspect it's about even.  Maybe skewed more to who is in power at the moment.

 

The ACA had some good things , but it fell FAR short of what President Obama and a Democrat Congress promised which is the point.  

Edited by reddogblitz
Posted
2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


You guys can’t even do a boycott correctly lmfao 

 

 

You think this beer is going to sell so well that 10 employees can't keep up? I am gonna buy from local breweries, which is what I have done for several years now simply because INBEV has destroyed several great beers over the years. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Yes, all true.  The D's are also motivated by lobbyist dollars altho providing insurance for 40 mil more Americans would never have been an R priority.  Hell, the R's have been trying to rescind Obamacare ever since it was passed.  Who do you think the insurance companies have more in their pockets?

 

Why … Bernie and Warren…. Of course 

 

progressive!!

 

😮 


https://bluetent.us/articles/campaigns-elections/a-surprising-number-of-progressives-took-big-pharma-money-in/

Posted
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Nice find.  I guess they thought Biden would win and know he's against Medicare for all.  I don't believe D's are lily white when it comes to donations.  I'm happy to see them called out.  Now let's all agree to strict campaign contribution limits and rescinding Citizens united.  I'm betting filthy clarence will be on the wrong side however.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

Nice find.  I guess they thought Biden would win and know he's against Medicare for all.  I don't believe D's are lily white when it comes to donations.  I'm happy to see them called out.  Now let's all agree to strict campaign contribution limits and rescinding Citizens united.  I'm betting filthy clarence will be on the wrong side however.


An interesting idea I like is the campaigns are federally funded and equal amongst candidates. I’d gladly pay tax money to prevent legalized corruption. 

Being good at fund raising has nothing to do with execution of high office. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


An interesting idea I like is the campaigns are federally funded and equal amongst candidates. I’d gladly pay tax money to prevent legalized corruption. 

Totally agree.  Hell, it shouldn't cost that much to run campaigns.  Debates are cheap and the networks will broadcast them for free.

 

btw, I discussed Medicare for all with Tim Kaine at a fundraiser a couple of years ago.  He was against it and still seems to be.  Most centrist Dems are.  I'm not sure why.  He didn't give me a satisfactory reason other than lots of jobs will be lost and the health care sector is very important to the economy.  Still like the guy but disagree on this point.  More troubling is the progressives hypocrisy here.  The ends justify the means doesn't fly with me.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Totally agree.  Hell, it shouldn't cost that much to run campaigns.  Debates are cheap and the networks will broadcast them for free.

 

btw, I discussed Medicare for all with Tim Kaine at a fundraiser a couple of years ago.  He was against it and still seems to be.  Most centrist Dems are.  I'm not sure why.  He didn't give me a satisfactory reason other than lots of jobs will be lost and the health care sector is very important to the economy.  Still like the guy but disagree on this point.  More troubling is the progressives hypocrisy here.  The ends justify the means doesn't fly with me.

 

The best way to go about it in the States is to do a German model where a public plan backed by the government competes with private ones. Everyone automatically gets the public care, but you can opt out of it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Totally agree.  Hell, it shouldn't cost that much to run campaigns.  Debates are cheap and the networks will broadcast them for free.

 

btw, I discussed Medicare for all with Tim Kaine at a fundraiser a couple of years ago.  He was against it and still seems to be.  Most centrist Dems are.  I'm not sure why.  He didn't give me a satisfactory reason other than lots of jobs will be lost and the health care sector is very important to the economy.  Still like the guy but disagree on this point.  More troubling is the progressives hypocrisy here.  The ends justify the means doesn't fly with me.


I’m a cynic and don’t trust people whose career aspirations is to control other people. My guess, is if they got it, they lose an issue that gets voters to come out…  same thing with most of these slam dunk your side my side topics.  All these politically minded ***** are really sick. it’s appalling how twisted they are even just seeing it first hand in a medium sized corporation. They play all these little games all the time. It’s all a show. 
 

 

The idea of compromising to appease the 70% of moderates is dead. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...