Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

ITs whatever MSNBC says, then any deflection possible.

 

Its like some have no intention of organic replies and post. 

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

What kind of clown believes showing 5 year old sexual explicit pictures is appropriate? Seriously what is wrong with you?

 

That is not happening anywhere. Grow up and touch grass.

7 hours ago, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

 

No school library anywhere is putting porn in its collection. Go outside. 

6 hours ago, Chris farley said:

ITs whatever MSNBC says, then any deflection possible.

 

Its like some have no intention of organic replies and post. 

 

 

 

Uh huh. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

 

That is not happening anywhere. Grow up and touch grass.

 

No school library anywhere is putting porn in its collection. Go outside. 

 

Uh huh. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11317925/amp/Shocking-footage-family-friendly-drag-queen-sees-performer-spreading-legs-kids.html

 

So this is a lie? Or is this not sexual? 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted

A few weeks ago, I had dinner with some friends. One of them pulled out his phone and asked me if I thought I had written more than 200 pieces or so at this stage of my career. “Probably,” I said. “Why?”

Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates

“You know, the way things are going, artificial intelligence is going to be able to write articles and books just by analyzing your writing style.” I was initially incredulous, maybe a bit dismissive. Then my friend went to a program on his phone and put in a query, asking it to write a 1,000-word Christmas story in the style of Charles Dickens. To my amazement, the program started churning out paragraphs within seconds — and not just a jumble of random words. The grafs had sentence variation, color, plot development.

He did another query: Think of a title for a children’s holiday book aimed at a Black audience. Within seconds, a list populated — and the winner was something to the effect of “Zahra’s Big Holiday Surprise.” I was stunned.

 

I thought of that convo as the news came down this week that the popular electronics site CNET has been using AI to write full articles. Frank Landymore at the Byte documents how eagle-eyed marketer Gael Breton figured out that CNET had quietly published more than 70 articles using AI since November, under the author name “CNET Money Staff.” Clicking on the author’s note reveals the truth:

“This article was assisted by an AI engine and reviewed, fact-checked and edited by our editorial staff.”

On top of that, it appears these AI-generated articles have benefited from Google traffic, despite the fact that Google has said it will prioritize human-generated content. Landymore wrote that a Google spokesman had clarified, “Our ranking team focuses on the usefulness of content, rather than how the content is produced.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/01/13/ai-writers-performance-enhancing-steroid/

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

This is an interesting thought. 

More than interesting Tibs.  Even without Market Garden we had the upper hand.  Many soldiers of that time had the same opinion.  My father included.  Roosevelt sold out to the Russians when he could have crushed them.  Always said they could have marched right thru them.  I hope there was some good reasons.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/12/2023 at 10:19 AM, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

Keep em stupid and insulated:  https://pen.org/banned-books-florida/

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted

Why are Biden’s own personal attorneys going after him, after protecting him for so long?

 

Just in time for the next presidential run? Something isn’t adding up…

 

Originally Biden had said he wanted to run for re-election, even though polls showed that Democrat voters wanted something different…

 

Then, potential presidential hopeful Gavin Newsom said he would withdraw his bid for president in 2024, and throw his support to Biden…

 

Then, about a month ago Biden was caught on a hot mic suggesting he wasn’t sure about a run for re-election…

 

And now, his personal attorneys find classified documents being illegally held by Biden in various places…

 

Have the Dems made a “U-turn” on who they want to lead the Party in ‘24?  Have they decided to use this controversy to hurt Biden’s chances? Is this a distraction for bigger things going on behind the scenes?

 

If you are familiar with how the government works, this definitely has the smell of something fishy…stay tuned…😉

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Why are Biden’s own personal attorneys going after him, after protecting him for so long?

 

Just in time for the next presidential run? Something isn’t adding up…

 

Originally Biden had said he wanted to run for re-election, even though polls showed that Democrat voters wanted something different…

 

Then, potential presidential hopeful Gavin Newsom said he would withdraw his bid for president in 2024, and throw his support to Biden…

 

Then, about a month ago Biden was caught on a hot mic suggesting he wasn’t sure about a run for re-election…

 

And now, his personal attorneys find classified documents being illegally held by Biden in various places…

 

Have the Dems made a “U-turn” on who they want to lead the Party in ‘24?  Have they decided to use this controversy to hurt Biden’s chances? Is this a distraction for bigger things going on behind the scenes?

 

If you are familiar with how the government works, this definitely has the smell of something fishy…stay tuned…😉

 

Yeah they sent his personal attorneys to move his stuff.  Because $1000/hour attorneys are the best movers.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...