Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 27 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If all it takes to get MAGA to ignore Hegseth's abhorrent personal history and complete lack of qualification for the job is for him to wear a suit with an American flag liner, it says a lot. Tell us about JFK. Or Bill Clinton.
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 26 Posted January 26 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: As I said before, Walz is 20 times the man that Hegseth will ever hope to be. Which qualifications does Walz have of being a manly man?
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 50 minutes ago, Doc said: Tell us about JFK. Or Bill Clinton. Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? Just now, Orlando Buffalo said: Which qualifications does Walz have of being a manly man? Not cheating on his wife or being a raging alcoholic, for one.
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 26 Posted January 26 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? Not cheating on his wife or being a raging alcoholic, for one. I completely agree with the cheating his wife part but unless he is still an alcoholic I disagree. I know too many people who had alcohol/substance abuse problems through their life to judge them if they have kicked the habit. Kicking the habit is harder than simply not starting.
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I completely agree with the cheating his wife part but unless he is still an alcoholic I disagree. I know too many people who had alcohol/substance abuse problems through their life to judge them if they have kicked the habit. Kicking the habit is harder than simply not starting. Certainly. But a real man owns it and gets help so that his friends and family are not being hurt anymore.
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Certainly. But a real man owns it and gets help so that his friends and family are not being hurt anymore. Does a real man advocate for murder as you do? Not only advocate for it but be very pleased by it?
Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 36 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? No. Cheating on one's spouse has nothing to do with being able to be a leader. It's just a dead argument and has been for decades now.
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 35 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Does a real man advocate for murder as you do? Not only advocate for it but be very pleased by it? Self-defense is not murder. 15 minutes ago, Doc said: No. Cheating on one's spouse has nothing to do with being able to be a leader. It's just a dead argument and has been for decades now. Are you kidding? It’s the litmus test for loyalty. If someone can’t even respect the sacred bond of marriage, MULTIPLE TIMES, how can we trust them in a position like SecDef? 1 2
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, Roundybout said: Self-defense is not murder. To paraphrase you “I will be very pleased if these agents get Luigi’s”. That in itself is sickening and grotesque. Now you want to pretend it’s about self defense. Ball-less response. I never imagined it could happen but you have jumped the Billstime shark. Truly contemptible.
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: To paraphrase you “I will be very pleased if these agents get Luigi’s”. That in itself is sickening and grotesque. Now you want to pretend it’s about self defense. Ball-less response. I never imagined it could happen but you have jumped the Billstime shark. Truly contemptible. It is. A small family seeking a better life in the US is of no threat whatsoever to the nation. Trump's little gestapo can go pound sand.
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, Roundybout said: It is. A small family seeking a better life in the US is of no threat whatsoever to the nation. Trump's little gestapo can go pound sand. Are you feeling very pleased at the murder of the border patrol agent this week?
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, JDHillFan said: Are you feeling very pleased at the murder of the border patrol agent this week? Were they trying to throw a 5-year-old in the back of a C-130? Then no.
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Just now, Roundybout said: Were they trying to throw a 5-year-old in the back of a C-130? Then no. How will you pick and choose which murders to be very pleased with?
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: How will you pick and choose which murders to be very pleased with? As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States.
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States. So if those people murder an agent it’s all good? Any other murder is bad? Just trying to understand your ground rules. You invoked the Pope earlier this week. Are we now seeing some wiggle room in the “thou shalt not kill” commandment? Francis on board?
Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 39 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Are you kidding? It’s the litmus test for loyalty. If someone can’t even respect the sacred bond of marriage, MULTIPLE TIMES, how can we trust them in a position like SecDef? LOL! Is some hotter country going to seduce him?
Roundybout Posted January 26 Posted January 26 21 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: So if those people murder an agent it’s all good? Any other murder is bad? Just trying to understand your ground rules. You invoked the Pope earlier this week. Are we now seeing some wiggle room in the “thou shalt not kill” commandment? Francis on board? Self-defense in the face of tyranny sounds good to me
JDHillFan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Self-defense in the face of tyranny sounds good to me How does this mesh with your Catholicism? What you are cheering for is murder. It shows how pitiful you are that you won’t use the word. Everything but. The progressive bubble you live in is destroying you. Sad that you are unaware.
Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Killing people trying to return people to their home countries is fine, but defending yourself from an attacker isn't. Amazing "logic."
sherpa Posted January 26 Posted January 26 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States. And this will never stop until it is fixed at its source, which is those countries. 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? Not cheating on his wife or being a raging alcoholic, for one. Calling someone whom you have no experience with a raging alcoholic is the kind of thing that got Stephanopolous a massive law suit loss for ABC calling Trump a a rapist.. Discipline yourself, and quit judging unless you know.
Recommended Posts