Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh please, the border was a disaster Trump's first term. Remember the wall that never got built? 

 

That the wall didn't get built made the border a "disaster"?  LOL!  Never mind that it was Dems who fought it every step of the way. 

 

But even still, Trump's numbers were a fifth of what Biden's have been.  Now that's a disaster.  And the Dems paid dearly for it at the ballot box.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No, I don't see a "border crisis" 

And you haven’t at any point. It’s one of many reasons that you come off as dim. 
 

Your party seems to disagree though it was too little, too late wasn’t it.
 

https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4451356-democrats-are-suddenly-singing-a-different-tune-on-the-border/

 

https://www.axios.com/2024/04/28/democrats-border-crisis-biden-immigration-trump


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/democrats-border-security-task-force-seeks-redefine-party-immigration-rcna143039

 

Edited by Biden is Mentally Fit
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Just like in the 51st state, left wing governments put non citizens, ahead of the safety, culture and housing of the very citizens who pay the taxes and created these wonderful countries. Every mayor, council and judge in a sanctuary city who supported the violations of the federal laws should be charged. It is not their house to open the doors and invite the Trojan horse into it.

Controlled immigration is the ONLY method into our house...protecting citizens is paramount.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

Just like in the 51st state, left wing governments put non citizens, ahead of the safety, culture and housing of the very citizens who pay the taxes and created these wonderful countries. Every mayor, council and judge in a sanctuary city who supported the violations of the federal laws should be charged. It is not their house to open the doors and invite the Trojan horse into it.

Controlled immigration is the ONLY method into our house...protecting citizens is paramount.


Seems like somebody has very strong opinions about sanctuary cities despite clearly not knowing what a sanctuary city is. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 2
Posted
6 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


Seems like somebody has very strong opinions about sanctuary cities despite clearly not knowing what a sanctuary city is. 

Well then enlighten us, what part does he have wrong?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

Et tu Britannia?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/dec/27/centre-right-extremism-the-west-moderates-populist

None of this is to be sentimental about the old centre right, which from the 1980s onwards increasingly offered sink-or-swim economics and military adventurism. It is to recognise that democratic norms are no longer in fashion, and the consensus over what is “too extreme” has collapsed.

On each side of the Atlantic, mainstream rightwingers – in politics and media – embrace positions they would previously have resisted. From naked bigotry to disinformation to treating opponents as dangerous national threats, the trend is clear. Where will it end? Here, there is no obvious answer, because the borders of the mainstream right are no longer policed. The tragic truth is that the western world may only get this out of its system when confronted with the consequences of such an ideology. A grim reckoning awaits us.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Vomit 1
Posted
10 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


Seems like somebody has very strong opinions about sanctuary cities despite clearly not knowing what a sanctuary city is. 

Goose you have to stop making yourself look mentally stunted with comments like this. Please enlighten us on what a sanctuary city is if not a place that protects non citizens at the expense of actual citizens? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

Goose you have to stop making yourself look mentally stunted with comments like this. Please enlighten us on what a sanctuary city is if not a place that protects non citizens at the expense of actual citizens? 


A sanctuary city is simply a city where the local police do not do the work of federal immigration enforcement. 
 

It’s not at the expense of the safety of actual citizens since studies consistently show that sanctuary cities have no measurable impact on crime (and may even have a slight downward effect).

 

This makes sense to anyone who actually understands immigration and doesn’t get their news from a firehouse of misinformation as you seem to do, child. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


A sanctuary city is simply a city where the local police do not do the work of federal immigration enforcement. 
 

It’s not at the expense of the safety of actual citizens since studies consistently show that sanctuary cities have no measurable impact on crime (and may even have a slight downward effect).

 

This makes sense to anyone who actually understands immigration and doesn’t get their news from a firehouse of misinformation as you seem to do, child. 

If only I was as smart as you, can you tell me who all the unsolved crimes are committed by according to your analysis? Is there one liberal city who applies any unsolved crimes to a single person here illegally? But your argument is hilarious because you have to argue that a city where someone can be set on fire without a reaction from anyone is safer than where I live.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

If only I was as smart as you, can you tell me who all the unsolved crimes are committed by according to your analysis? Is there one liberal city who applies any unsolved crimes to a single person here illegally? But your argument is hilarious because you have to argue that a city where someone can be set on fire without a reaction from anyone is safer than where I live.

 

Are you high? Or just so in deep in your own bubble that what you posted actually makes sense to you as a cogent argument and not a word salad of straw man arguments?

Posted
44 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Are you high? Or just so in deep in your own bubble that what you posted actually makes sense to you as a cogent argument and not a word salad of straw man arguments?

You actually argued that people who are willing to break the law to enter the country are less likely to break any further laws. That is stupidly against everything we know about human psychology. Sanctuary cities have higher crime rates than non sanctuary cities as a whole, and it is not that close. But I will ask you to name three cities you believe have been improved by being sanctuary cities, and if you can name three I will not respond.

×
×
  • Create New...