Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Because I’m concerned about the policy that schools can directly fix.

Schools have been providing meals to low income students for longer than you have been alive. What makes it an issue now? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Schools have been providing meals to low income students for longer than you have been alive. What makes it an issue now? 


It’s not enough, that’s what.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


It’s not enough, that’s what.

My wife has taught for 20+ years and abd before we went to all free lunches people had to be means tested, which was not that big a deal and was never truly verified. The issue came up where a multiple time pro bowl NFL player had a kid at my wife's school who qualified because the father was a deadbeat dad despite being worth 10+ million. Why do I have to pay to feed his kid? And this is a true situation. 

Posted
4 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

I honestly wonder what the bureaucratic / administrative costs of means testing for school lunches would be against the cost of just giving everyone food.

 

I wouldn’t be surprised if it was easier and cheaper to just to give it to every kid instead of trying to determine who qualifies. 

Why not just give every child cash and cut the middleman out entirely?  That’s got to be way easier and cheaper still. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Whataboutism is a common logical fallacy.

 

We’re not talking about that, we’re talking about school lunches. 

Roundy’s manifesto for government excellence is pro-food m-f 8am-2:20pm, save vacation days, days of religious observance, carve outs for teacher meetings/district events, snow days and those days that would have been snow days had it snowed on certain days when it didn’t snow.  
 

It’s sort of a long campaign slogan but you’ll get some votes.  

Posted
4 hours ago, SCBills said:

 

She was also 6'9" and much bigger than him and could have easily overpowered him. This was no ordinary woman. He's lucky to be alive. When Lefties don't concede these points it absolutely ruins their entire case and they lose all credibility.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

My wife has taught for 20+ years and abd before we went to all free lunches people had to be means tested, which was not that big a deal and was never truly verified. The issue came up where a multiple time pro bowl NFL player had a kid at my wife's school who qualified because the father was a deadbeat dad despite being worth 10+ million. Why do I have to pay to feed his kid? And this is a true situation. 


You answered your own question. “Deadbeat dad.”

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Go to court and garnish wages.


I’d suggest just feeding all the kids in the meantime but maybe I’m just too pragmatic. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


I’d suggest just feeding all the kids in the meantime but maybe I’m just too pragmatic. 

You are definitely way too emotional. That's for sure.

  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

You are definitely way too emotional. That's for sure.


I do advocate for good public policy, yes. Because it makes the world a better place. 

×
×
  • Create New...