Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


I’m not. 

You claimed the only reason people are against him is his race, when it is his behavior. You are the only person on here defending him. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

You claimed the only reason people are against him is his race, when it is his behavior. You are the only person on here defending him. 


No *****. That’s exactly my point. That’s why I’m calling out posts like “coming soon to America” or whatever, because it has nothing to do with race. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

No *****. That’s exactly my point. That’s why I’m calling out posts like “coming soon to America” or whatever, because it has nothing to do with race. 

 

Right.  You guys know how to interpret things correctly.  Biden still the nominee?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Right.  You guys know how to interpret things correctly.  Biden still the nominee?


And that has…what to do with the current topic? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


No *****. That’s exactly my point. That’s why I’m calling out posts like “coming soon to America” or whatever, because it has nothing to do with race. 

I didn't say coming to America, I said the media was dishonest. Why am I racist? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

I didn't say coming to America, I said the media was dishonest. Why am I racist? 


Wait did I quote the wrong guy? I meant to quote Docs post. Sorry. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

And that has…what to do with the current topic? 

 

Meaning you guys read into things whatever you want and your powers of observation are woefully lacking.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Meaning you guys read into things whatever you want and your powers of observation are woefully lacking.

Another thoughtful contribution. Thanks. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

Another thoughtful contribution. Thanks. 

 

Likewise except you literally said nothing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Meaning you guys read into things whatever you want and your powers of observation are woefully lacking.


Deflection is not an argument 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

Deflection is not an argument 

 

Right.  The "Joe Biden is fine" was a sight to behold.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

You’re still doing it 

 

Then you need to look up the definition of "projection."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Yes, the racists are very entrenched. No one cares. 

These streets and neighborhoods look very walkable if one removes the roving gangs of miscreants on every street corner.   What's the plan to address this sort of societal unrest in the collective, Roundy?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

These streets and neighborhoods look very walkable if one removes the roving gangs of miscreants on every street corner.   What's the plan to address this sort of societal unrest in the collective, Roundy?  


Laws are good and should be enforced. That said, the root cause of this is building more housing. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Laws are good and should be enforced. That said, the root cause of this is building more housing. 

Building more houses does not happen because of liberalism. The gangs happen because of liberalism. The illegals happen because of liberalism. But you continue to vote liberal and complain that conservatives don't fix what you mess up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Laws are good and should be enforced. That said, the root cause of this is building more housing. 

I think about experiments in government mandated/assigned housing in foreign lands…places like the USSR.  Is that the solution to today’s crisis—government built complexes, communal living, with x amount of space designated to individuals/families?  An improvement on that model?   
 

Personally, I think the root cause of the problem is a failure of the government to govern pretty much across the board.  

Posted
47 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

Building more houses does not happen because of liberalism. The gangs happen because of liberalism. The illegals happen because of liberalism. But you continue to vote liberal and complain that conservatives don't fix what you mess up. 

 

NIMBYism is across the political spectrum. 

 

I don't know why you're whining about "illegals" in England since the psychopath who stabbed the kids was a British citizen. 

 

If you want to have a good faith talk about integrating second-gen immigrants, a definite real problem, then I'm all ears. 

8 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I think about experiments in government mandated/assigned housing in foreign lands…places like the USSR.  Is that the solution to today’s crisis—government built complexes, communal living, with x amount of space designated to individuals/families?  An improvement on that model?   
 

Personally, I think the root cause of the problem is a failure of the government to govern pretty much across the board.  

 

Possibly. I'm not a huge fan of government housing since it's a slippery slope policy to "let's take the poor and shove them somewhere else," and it creates de facto ghettos. Same problem that rent control has, which I'm very opposed to. 

 

The root cause of the housing crisis, IMO, are outdated restrictions on new construction. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

 

NIMBYism is across the political spectrum. 

 

I don't know why you're whining about "illegals" in England since the psychopath who stabbed the kids was a British citizen. 

 

If you want to have a good faith talk about integrating second-gen immigrants, a definite real problem, then I'm all ears. 

I like that you offer no solutions to the problems your side creates. Secondly nothing Iisted is a NIMBY problem unless you think the entire country is my backyard. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...