Jump to content

Random Political Thoughts Inc.


T&C

Recommended Posts

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

 The left has shown it's prevalence for violence.  Maybe your onto something 

 

For once 

 

 


People tend to be angry when their rights are taken away, yes. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roundybout said:


I genuinely believe someone takes a shot at Trump if he’s reelected, yes, and yes it would be someone on the left as I don’t think the right would try to kill off their god emperor 

You stated earlier we will see mass civil violence not seen since the 60s and now you believe assassination is also in play. All perpetrated by those on your political side. 
 

I don’t want to search for it, but are you one to refer to other people as being in a cult?

 

All my best as you and your allies try to come in off the ledge. Good heavens man. Effing scary. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


People tend to be angry when their rights are taken away, yes. 

The state does not provide rights, they cannot take them away.  

 

But understand how you all push for some new world where the state does provide  and hence can remove them.  

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You stated earlier we will see mass civil violence not seen since the 60s and now you believe assassination is also in play. All perpetrated by those on your political side. 
 

I don’t want to search for it, but are you one to refer to other people as being in a cult?

 

All my best as you and your allies try to come in off the ledge. Good heavens man. Effing scary. 
 

 


As I’ve said before, people are not going to sit idle and watch Project 2025 be enacted. No way. 

All this over Donald Trump. Incredible stuff, really. 

3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

The state does not provide rights, they cannot take them away.  

 

But understand how you all push for some new world where the state does provide  and hence can remove them.  

 

 

 


The state sure as hell enforces them though, and can block them. Gay marriage, for one, is recognized by the state. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government has no businesses being involved in marriage.  

 

Project 25 is a wish list for extreme conservatives.  The orange dude panders to them but is no conservative.  

 

That's as simple as the argument corporate Biden is going to listen to the wills of the communist he panders to and start nationalizing industry.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

The government has no businesses being involved in marriage.  

 

Project 25 is a wish list for extreme conservatives.  The orange dude panders to them but is no conservative.  

 

That's as simple as the argument corporate Biden is going to listen to the wills of the communist he panders to and start nationalizing industry.  

 

 


How can you possibly say that when marriage gets you benefits like tax breaks? Come on. 
 

And Trump already has hosted psychopaths like Nick Fuentes at the White House and we know he “retruths” QAnoners on his social media platform, he’s absolutely going to be open to Project 2025. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roundybout said:


How can you possibly say that when marriage gets you benefits like tax breaks? Come on. 
 

And Trump already has hosted psychopaths like Nick Fuentes at the White House and we know he “retruths” QAnoners on his social media platform, he’s absolutely going to be open to Project 2025. 

Nick is a socialist like you.  Him and morons like Richard Spencer say the government should provide, so they can take it away from who they don't like .  

 

I don't see marriage being anyplace in the constitution.  

 

Or those income taxes you can get a break from by proving you have children.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Nick is a socialist like you.  Him and morons like Richard Spencer say the government should provide, so they can take it away from who they don't like .  

 

I don't see marriage being anyplace in the constitution.  

 

Or those income taxes you can get a break from by proving you have children.  

 

 


1) I’m not a socialist

 

2) Nick is a national socialist who believes everything he doesn’t like is “gay and Jewish” and believes women should not have the right to vote 

 

3) AR-15s are not in the constitution either, but conservatives fall over each other to buy 9 of them 

 

4) those aren’t in the constitution either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roundybout said:

I’m slowly accepting that if Trump is put back in office, there will be mass civil violence in the U.S. the likes of which we haven’t seen since the 1960s.
 

He simply cannot be allowed to take office again.  

 

Well then, Dem leaders will just need to tweet for them to stay calm and that should end it, right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


1) I’m not a socialist

 

2) Nick is a national socialist who believes everything he doesn’t like is “gay and Jewish” and believes women should not have the right to vote 

 

3) AR-15s are not in the constitution either, but conservatives fall over each other to buy 9 of them 

 

4) those aren’t in the constitution either 

The device you are communicating with want in the constitution.  But it's still covered by the first 

 

Ar and semi auto handguns were not.  Good job for getting that correct.  

 

Same argument for the first makes yours for the second mute.  

 

Them conservatives ain't the ones shooting up the cities every damn weekend. 

 

Ok, then you are a communist.  Your posting show that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

The device you are communicating with want in the constitution.  But it's still covered by the first 

 

Ar and semi auto handguns were not.  Good job for getting that correct.  

 

Same argument for the first makes yours for the second mute.  

 

Them conservatives ain't the ones shooting up the cities every damn weekend. 

 

Ok, then you are a communist.  Your posting show that 


Technically it’s not, the actual media platform were on isn’t covered by the first amendment either because it’s private. Mods may shut down whatever they want. 
 

Wouldn’t expect conservatives to shoot up cities, seeing as they’re scared to enter them, but they sure like shooting up gay nightclubs. 
 

What’s communism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
 

Wouldn’t expect conservatives to shoot up cities, seeing as they’re scared to enter them, but they sure like shooting up gay nightclubs. 
 

What’s communism?

Your morphing into the late, ungreat Billstime is nearing completion. Good for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


1) I’m not a socialist

 

2) Nick is a national socialist who believes everything he doesn’t like is “gay and Jewish” and believes women should not have the right to vote 

 

3) AR-15s are not in the constitution either, but conservatives fall over each other to buy 9 of them 

 

4) those aren’t in the constitution either 

It's seems like your dealing with the debate results just swimmingly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...