Pokebball Posted February 10 Posted February 10 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Bull. This reporter identified the kids working for Elon in DOGE and has since received violent threats and demands for her job, such as below. Who was previously bringing this transparency to the american public?
Roundybout Posted February 10 Posted February 10 8 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Who was previously bringing this transparency to the american public? What do you mean?
Pokebball Posted February 10 Posted February 10 59 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What do you mean? my point exactly 1 1
Pokebball Posted February 10 Posted February 10 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: What do you mean? Watch this you flippen beach ball full of nonsense! 1
Roundybout Posted February 10 Posted February 10 38 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Watch this you flippen beach ball full of nonsense! This has absolutely nothing to do with the journalist threatened for releasing the names of the DOGE employees. You can’t scream about transparency and then also scream when we find out exactly who Elon’s cronies are.
Pokebball Posted February 10 Posted February 10 21 minutes ago, Roundybout said: This has absolutely nothing to do with the journalist threatened for releasing the names of the DOGE employees. You can’t scream about transparency and then also scream when we find out exactly who Elon’s cronies are. Trillions in your tax dollars vs a stupid comment from a stupid youngster? Yeah, I think I actually can.
Roundybout Posted February 10 Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Trillions in your tax dollars vs a stupid comment from a stupid youngster? Yeah, I think I actually can. I think we should know who is making all these massive (unconstitutional) cuts to our bureaucracy. But then I’m not a gigantic hypocrite so.
Orlando Buffalo Posted February 10 Posted February 10 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Brilliant idea from the stable genius https://finance.yahoo.com/news/getting-rid-penny-introduces-problem-162747341.html The fact that this idea bothers you is hilarious since it is an idea that has been around the government since Clinton because I discussed it in college. It is the question if it is worth the cost of the coin and cost to businesses to deal with them. If you disagree that is fine but to pretend it is revolutionary tell how hl behind the times you are.
Pokebball Posted February 11 Posted February 11 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I think we should know who is making all these massive (unconstitutional) cuts to our bureaucracy. But then I’m not a gigantic hypocrite so. What is DOGE cutting? Do you understand what DOGE is doing? It doesn't sound like you do! Edited February 11 by Pokebball
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 minute ago, Pokebball said: What is DOGE cutting? Do you understand what DOGE is doing? It doesn't sound like you do! DOGE is “identifying” what it deems to be “fraud” and bloat, then Donny decides to kill the programs. This is unconstitutional, which is why many judges have already halted the orders.
Pokebball Posted February 11 Posted February 11 12 minutes ago, Roundybout said: DOGE is “identifying” what it deems to be “fraud” and bloat, then Donny decides to kill the programs. This is unconstitutional, which is why many judges have already halted the orders. well, you said DOGE was cutting shyt and that couldn't be further from the truth. They are finding fraud and misuse of your taxes. It appears your anger should be directed at Trump. He's the guy doing all the shyt you don't like.
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 12 minutes ago, Pokebball said: well, you said DOGE was cutting shyt and that couldn't be further from the truth. They are finding fraud and misuse of your taxes. It appears your anger should be directed at Trump. He's the guy doing all the shyt you don't like. What fraud? “Stuff I don’t like” is not fraud.
Pokebball Posted February 11 Posted February 11 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What fraud? “Stuff I don’t like” is not fraud. all it is currently is suspected fraud. 56 million in medicaid and medicare disbursements to the same ssn? Does that look suspicious to you? do you think we should pursue this or not? why are you willing to piss on this?
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, Pokebball said: all it is currently is suspected fraud. 56 million in medicaid and medicare disbursements to the same ssn? Does that look suspicious to you? do you think we should pursue this or not? why are you willing to piss on this? The SSL thing is very suspicious and seems to be more of a database quirk.
Doc Posted February 11 Posted February 11 9 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Any chance at any convictions on anything you have listed passed many years ago. No ethical prosecutor will try and tie the Clinton's to anything criminal when they can just claim incompetent. Anyone who was a threat to any of this will keep their mouths shut or know it could end badly for them They could just invent a felony...
Orlando Buffalo Posted February 11 Posted February 11 49 minutes ago, Doc said: They could just invent a felony... I am sorry that is unconstitutional to its core, to change laws to find a way to convict some one is the very definition of a authoritative thug with no morals or ethics. The American people would certainly reject that kind of craven power play 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: The SSL thing is very suspicious and seems to be more of a database quirk. You literally are quoting a guy with 8 numbers in his name, which why Elon Musk thinks of you this way
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 39 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I am sorry that is unconstitutional to its core, to change laws to find a way to convict some one is the very definition of a authoritative thug with no morals or ethics. The American people would certainly reject that kind of craven power play You literally are quoting a guy with 8 numbers in his name, which why Elon Musk thinks of you this way I'm so glad the government is handing this guy billions to blow up rockets and call people slurs on Twitter.
Homelander Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I'm so glad the government is handing this guy billions to blow up rockets and call people slurs on Twitter. Despite all this "evidence," the GOP still refuses to issue him a subpoena. This entire situation is nothing but a con. 1
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, Homelander said: Despite all this "evidence," the GOP still refuses to issue him a subpoena. This entire situation is nothing but a con. Oh sure, I saw it a million miles away. Trump and Elon are kindred spirits in that they both have egos the size of a planet. Elon's deliberately targeting research and development organizations because it's 1) stuff that his fanbase can't comprehend and 2) it's easy to blame them as "waste" because research often doesn't present a product for a long time. 2
Orlando Buffalo Posted February 11 Posted February 11 9 hours ago, Roundybout said: I'm so glad the government is handing this guy billions to blow up rockets and call people slurs on Twitter. You are actually more bothered by the "bad word" than the fact you were wrong? Tells us a lot.
Recommended Posts