Orlando Buffalo Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? Not cheating on his wife or being a raging alcoholic, for one. I completely agree with the cheating his wife part but unless he is still an alcoholic I disagree. I know too many people who had alcohol/substance abuse problems through their life to judge them if they have kicked the habit. Kicking the habit is harder than simply not starting.
Roundybout Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I completely agree with the cheating his wife part but unless he is still an alcoholic I disagree. I know too many people who had alcohol/substance abuse problems through their life to judge them if they have kicked the habit. Kicking the habit is harder than simply not starting. Certainly. But a real man owns it and gets help so that his friends and family are not being hurt anymore.
JDHillFan Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Certainly. But a real man owns it and gets help so that his friends and family are not being hurt anymore. Does a real man advocate for murder as you do? Not only advocate for it but be very pleased by it?
Doc Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 36 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? No. Cheating on one's spouse has nothing to do with being able to be a leader. It's just a dead argument and has been for decades now.
Roundybout Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 35 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Does a real man advocate for murder as you do? Not only advocate for it but be very pleased by it? Self-defense is not murder. 15 minutes ago, Doc said: No. Cheating on one's spouse has nothing to do with being able to be a leader. It's just a dead argument and has been for decades now. Are you kidding? It’s the litmus test for loyalty. If someone can’t even respect the sacred bond of marriage, MULTIPLE TIMES, how can we trust them in a position like SecDef? 2
JDHillFan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, Roundybout said: Self-defense is not murder. To paraphrase you “I will be very pleased if these agents get Luigi’s”. That in itself is sickening and grotesque. Now you want to pretend it’s about self defense. Ball-less response. I never imagined it could happen but you have jumped the Billstime shark. Truly contemptible.
Roundybout Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: To paraphrase you “I will be very pleased if these agents get Luigi’s”. That in itself is sickening and grotesque. Now you want to pretend it’s about self defense. Ball-less response. I never imagined it could happen but you have jumped the Billstime shark. Truly contemptible. It is. A small family seeking a better life in the US is of no threat whatsoever to the nation. Trump's little gestapo can go pound sand.
JDHillFan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, Roundybout said: It is. A small family seeking a better life in the US is of no threat whatsoever to the nation. Trump's little gestapo can go pound sand. Are you feeling very pleased at the murder of the border patrol agent this week?
Roundybout Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, JDHillFan said: Are you feeling very pleased at the murder of the border patrol agent this week? Were they trying to throw a 5-year-old in the back of a C-130? Then no.
JDHillFan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, Roundybout said: Were they trying to throw a 5-year-old in the back of a C-130? Then no. How will you pick and choose which murders to be very pleased with?
Roundybout Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: How will you pick and choose which murders to be very pleased with? As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States.
JDHillFan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States. So if those people murder an agent it’s all good? Any other murder is bad? Just trying to understand your ground rules. You invoked the Pope earlier this week. Are we now seeing some wiggle room in the “thou shalt not kill” commandment? Francis on board?
Doc Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Are you kidding? It’s the litmus test for loyalty. If someone can’t even respect the sacred bond of marriage, MULTIPLE TIMES, how can we trust them in a position like SecDef? LOL! Is some hotter country going to seduce him?
Roundybout Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 21 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: So if those people murder an agent it’s all good? Any other murder is bad? Just trying to understand your ground rules. You invoked the Pope earlier this week. Are we now seeing some wiggle room in the “thou shalt not kill” commandment? Francis on board? Self-defense in the face of tyranny sounds good to me
JDHillFan Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Self-defense in the face of tyranny sounds good to me How does this mesh with your Catholicism? What you are cheering for is murder. It shows how pitiful you are that you won’t use the word. Everything but. The progressive bubble you live in is destroying you. Sad that you are unaware.
Doc Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Killing people trying to return people to their home countries is fine, but defending yourself from an attacker isn't. Amazing "logic."
sherpa Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: As above, families of four seeking shelter and stability from their war-torn nations pose zero threat to the United States. And this will never stop until it is fixed at its source, which is those countries. 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Then you hold the position that people who cheat on their wives should not be in power? Or, are you distracted by Hegseth's little suit coat like a baby distracted with keys? Not cheating on his wife or being a raging alcoholic, for one. Calling someone whom you have no experience with a raging alcoholic is the kind of thing that got Stephanopolous a massive law suit loss for ABC calling Trump a a rapist.. Discipline yourself, and quit judging unless you know.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: As I said before, Walz is 20 times the man that Hegseth will ever hope to be. Yes, you've said it. When you become the voice of reason, a voice of reason, or even somewhat reasonable, I'm certain your thoughts will be analyzed, reviewed, and filed appropriately.
Roundybout Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 29 minutes ago, sherpa said: And this will never stop until it is fixed at its source, which is those countries. Calling someone whom you have no experience with a raging alcoholic is the kind of thing that got Stephanopolous a massive law suit loss for ABC calling Trump a a rapist.. Discipline yourself, and quit judging unless you know. And until then, we shall take their poor, huddled masses and give them a better life. Hegseth’s issues are well-documented. Knock it off. 59 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: How does this mesh with your Catholicism? What you are cheering for is murder. It shows how pitiful you are that you won’t use the word. Everything but. The progressive bubble you live in is destroying you. Sad that you are unaware. Catholics have a duty to help the poor. Go read up on Saint Maximilian Kolbe or any other saints that protected the poor from prosecution 14 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Yes, you've said it. When you become the voice of reason, a voice of reason, or even somewhat reasonable, I'm certain your thoughts will be analyzed, reviewed, and filed appropriately. One day it’ll click with you, one day!
IrishLass Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Self-defense is not murder. Are you kidding? It’s the litmus test for loyalty. If someone can’t even respect the sacred bond of marriage, MULTIPLE TIMES, how can we trust them in a position like SecDef? lol. How can we trust Dwight D. Eisenhower to initiate D-Day, command the allied forces and defeat the (real) Nazis? You don't know much do you.
Recommended Posts