Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Been there done that Chef Jim Crow…

So tell me which States have election law statues that explicitly state "lets make sure Black people can't vote"?  Because that's the basis of the entire argument behind the JC 2.0 on steroids battle cry. 

 

 

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
31 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

So tell me which States have election law statues that explicitly state "lets make sure Black people can't vote"?  Because that's the basis of the entire argument behind the JC 2.0 on steroids battle cry. 

 

 

 


Waste of time. Neither he nor @SectionC3 have been able to even remotely compare this to Jim Crow let alone Jim Crow on steroids. 
 

It would hope that is incredibly offensive to anyone who had to suffer through the actual Jim Crow. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Waste of time. Neither he nor @SectionC3 have been able to even remotely compare this to Jim Crow let alone Jim Crow on steroids. 
 

It would hope that is incredibly offensive to anyone who had to suffer through the actual Jim Crow. 

Hoax.  I did.  You just didn’t do your homework.  Put the spatula down and get on it, Chef Jim Crow. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  I did.  

 

 

No, you most certainly did not.

 

But in your defense, no one else in the country has either.

 

It's just easier to claim racism without any basis...........................it's always worked before, right?

 

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

No, you most certainly did not.

 

But in your defense, no one else in the country has either.

 

It's just easier to claim racism without any basis...........................it's always worked before, right?

 

 

 

 

Hoax.  I did.  Spend less time posting stupid cartoons and more time reading carefully.   

Posted
15 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  I did.  You just didn’t do your homework.  Put the spatula down and get on it, Chef Jim Crow. 


If you actually had you would be showing me again.  There is nothing in that Bill that remotely resembles Jim Crow and to insinuate otherwise is one of the more stupid things I’ve heard. I would love to hear you make this assertion to someone who actually suffered through Jim Crow. 
 

 

12 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  I did.  Spend less time posting stupid cartoons and more time reading carefully.   


You did?  When? Where? How?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


If you actually had you would be showing me again.  There is nothing in that Bill that remotely resembles Jim Crow and to insinuate otherwise is one of the more stupid things I’ve heard. I would love to hear you make this assertion to someone who actually suffered through Jim Crow. 
 

 


You did?  When? Where? How?

Earlier.  I don’t do your homework for you, Chef Jim Crow.  Put the spatula down, stop mainlining HCQ, and get to work. Hint: it involves a link to sworn court papers summarizing the relevant events and points in a way better than could I, and you commented on the post.  Happy hunting, insurrectionist. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Earlier.  I don’t do your homework for you, Chef Jim Crow.  Put the spatula down, stop mainlining HCQ, and get to work. Hint: it involves a link to sworn court papers summarizing the relevant events and points in a way better than could I, and you commented on the post.  Happy hunting, insurrectionist. 


Yup I remember that. And it had nothing to do with the Bill being anything like Jim Crow let alone Jim Crow on steroids.  I pointed that out to you at the time and if I remember correctly you didn’t counter. You lost the argument and for some reason you’re doubling down on it. 
 

Carry on. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Yup I remember that. And it had nothing to do with the Bill being anything like Jim Crow let alone Jim Crow on steroids.  I pointed that out to you at the time and if I remember correctly you didn’t counter. You lost the argument and for some reason you’re doubling down on it. 
 

Carry on. 


I’m sorry, but your intransigence has required the invocation of Rule #2 here.  When you have a break in the revolution, please support your wild theories with a link or links.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 

Posted (edited)

 

 

Reminder:

 

21 Black Leaders Denounce the Left’s Lies About Georgia Election Law

 

FTA:

 

 

Twenty-one civil rights leaders and prominent black conservatives defended Georgia’s new election law in a letter to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, rejecting opponents’ comparisons to Jim Crow laws. 

 

“It has become clear that even well-intentioned critics of the law simply have no idea what the law is,” the black leaders write in the letter, adding:

 

It is clear they have no idea how favorably Georgia’s new law compares with most other states—including President Biden’s home state of Delaware. And it is clear they have no idea that a majority of black voters across the country support the key provision under attack by critics—the simple requirement that voters be able to identify themselves when voting. This is the same simple requirement needed to pick up baseball tickets or board a plane—activities hardly as important as voting.

 

“They have tarred with the brush of racism people whose only sin is a desire for confidence in our elections,” the black leaders’ open letter says. 

 

The letter from the black leaders goes on to say: 

 

We, along with dozens of other black pastors and civic leaders in Georgia fully understand and support the state’s new election integrity law—a law that will help rebuild voter confidence, and make sure every vote counts.  Those who have been deceived by a political campaign to discredit the new law and punish the state of Georgia, should stop, take a step back, and understand the real agenda here.     

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/04/20/exclusive-21-black-leaders-defend-georgia-voting-law-as-proper-honest-reform/?fbclid=IwAR3nlMub6RfD5I7_TmLHAkb3fUu9GMEIoDZxeIupGgCrcWqjiCRoMHcRsuY

 

 

 

But, Section 8 knows better than them.

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
Posted
16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Reminder:

 

21 Black Leaders Denounce the Left’s Lies About Georgia Election Law

 

FTA:

 

 

Twenty-one civil rights leaders and prominent black conservatives defended Georgia’s new election law in a letter to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, rejecting opponents’ comparisons to Jim Crow laws. 

 

“It has become clear that even well-intentioned critics of the law simply have no idea what the law is,” the black leaders write in the letter, adding:

 

It is clear they have no idea how favorably Georgia’s new law compares with most other states—including President Biden’s home state of Delaware. And it is clear they have no idea that a majority of black voters across the country support the key provision under attack by critics—the simple requirement that voters be able to identify themselves when voting. This is the same simple requirement needed to pick up baseball tickets or board a plane—activities hardly as important as voting.

 

“They have tarred with the brush of racism people whose only sin is a desire for confidence in our elections,” the black leaders’ open letter says. 

 

The letter from the black leaders goes on to say: 

 

We, along with dozens of other black pastors and civic leaders in Georgia fully understand and support the state’s new election integrity law—a law that will help rebuild voter confidence, and make sure every vote counts.  Those who have been deceived by a political campaign to discredit the new law and punish the state of Georgia, should stop, take a step back, and understand the real agenda here.     

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/04/20/exclusive-21-black-leaders-defend-georgia-voting-law-as-proper-honest-reform/?fbclid=IwAR3nlMub6RfD5I7_TmLHAkb3fUu9GMEIoDZxeIupGgCrcWqjiCRoMHcRsuY

 

 

 

But, Section 8 knows better than them.

 

 

 

 

And section 8 wonders why he always sits in the 3rd chair. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:


I’m sorry, but your intransigence has required the invocation of Rule #2 here.  When you have a break in the revolution, please support your wild theories with a link or links.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 


Shouldn’t Rule #2 actually apply to you first?  Mmhmm

 

Check. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Shouldn’t Rule #2 actually apply to you first?  Mmhmm

 

Check. 

 

Hoax.  You made the statement that I have failed to comply with Rule #2.  If/when the revolution ends, please prove it in accordance with Rule #2.  Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. 

Posted

All 3rd string did was call Chef names and little else.  He knows that his party is cheating but he doesn't care.  To them, blacks are too lazy and/or stupid to be able to do things without them being made incredibly easy.  But that's not racism at al.

Posted
Just now, Doc said:

All 3rd string did was call Chef names and little else.  He knows that his party is cheating but he doesn't care.  To them, blacks are too lazy and/or stupid to be able to do things without them being made incredibly easy.  But that's not racism at al.

 

Hoax.  Rule #2, please.  In the meantime, try not to eat all of the HCQ in your stash.  The fools in Florida and Mississippi may need to borrow it from you. 

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  Rule #2, please.  In the meantime, try not to eat all of the HCQ in your stash.  The fools in Florida and Mississippi may need to borrow it from you. 

 

You should flee the board like your heroes in Texas.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  Rule #2, please.  In the meantime, try not to eat all of the HCQ in your stash.  The fools in Florida and Mississippi may need to borrow it from you. 


Rule #2?

 

You first. It’s how it works right?

 

Check. 

Posted
Just now, Chef Jim said:

Rule #2?

 

You first. It’s how it works right?

 

Check. 

 

I'm sure it's like Rule #1: "don't talk about [it]."

Posted
49 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Reminder:

 

21 Black Leaders Denounce the Left’s Lies About Georgia Election Law

 

FTA:

 

 

Twenty-one civil rights leaders and prominent black conservatives defended Georgia’s new election law in a letter to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, rejecting opponents’ comparisons to Jim Crow laws. 

 

“It has become clear that even well-intentioned critics of the law simply have no idea what the law is,” the black leaders write in the letter, adding:

 

It is clear they have no idea how favorably Georgia’s new law compares with most other states—including President Biden’s home state of Delaware. And it is clear they have no idea that a majority of black voters across the country support the key provision under attack by critics—the simple requirement that voters be able to identify themselves when voting. This is the same simple requirement needed to pick up baseball tickets or board a plane—activities hardly as important as voting.

 

“They have tarred with the brush of racism people whose only sin is a desire for confidence in our elections,” the black leaders’ open letter says. 

 

The letter from the black leaders goes on to say: 

 

We, along with dozens of other black pastors and civic leaders in Georgia fully understand and support the state’s new election integrity law—a law that will help rebuild voter confidence, and make sure every vote counts.  Those who have been deceived by a political campaign to discredit the new law and punish the state of Georgia, should stop, take a step back, and understand the real agenda here.     

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/04/20/exclusive-21-black-leaders-defend-georgia-voting-law-as-proper-honest-reform/?fbclid=IwAR3nlMub6RfD5I7_TmLHAkb3fUu9GMEIoDZxeIupGgCrcWqjiCRoMHcRsuY

 

 

 

But, Section 8 knows better than them.

 

 

 

 

They should have had Diamond and Silk sign it, too.  Would have made it even better. 

×
×
  • Create New...