Doc Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: These laws wouldn’t exist if they didn’t suppress someone right doc? In this case it is voters who leveraged drive in voting. Are you for or against For the People act? Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote. 2
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 12 minutes ago, Doc said: Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote. ie. voters who blue. Governor Abbott, who uses a wheelchair - knows the convenience drive thru offers to caregivers. Stop gaslighting and pushing the Big Lie because the SOB you voted for lost in a landslide.
Chef Jim Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 25 minutes ago, BillStime said: Governor Abbott, who uses a wheelchair - knows the convenience drive thru offers to caregivers. Who are you talking about? Caregivers for whom?
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote. DOES NOT EQUAL voters who blue. It means those persons, no matter of sex, color, wealth, or political persuasion who are NOT eligible to vote cannot votes. Thats how the law applies ---- equally 2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Who are you talking about? Caregivers for whom? That is a BillZtime squirrel Jim (as you know.) "Drive through voting" is not necessary for voters, that is why Mail-in / Absentee ballots were developed. but he wants to divert from his earlier B.S.
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Who are you talking about? Caregivers for whom? It was just an example sunshine.
Chef Jim Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: It was just an example sunshine. Example of what?
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 1 minute ago, Chef Jim said: Example of what? That you have really poor reading comprehension.
Chef Jim Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 43 minutes ago, BillStime said: That you have really poor reading comprehension. It’s an example of what? I’m just looking for clarification that’s all.
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 back to the thread........ https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/definite_sign_of_panic_pennsylvania_acting_secretary_of_state_issues_illegal_orders_to_obstruct_audit_of_2020_election.html Definite sign of panic: Pennsylvania acting Secretary of State issues illegal orders to obstruct audit of 2020 election By Thomas Lifson Yesterday, I wrote that it looks like Pennsylvania Dems are panicking over the audit of the 2020 election announced by State Senator Doug Mastriano, chair of the state senate’s Intergovernmental Operations Committee. Two days after the announcement of the audit, President Biden suddenly was scheduled for a trip to the Keystone State "to deliver remarks on actions to protect the sacred constitutional right to vote." Bringing the “The Big Guy” to pressure officials to obstruct access to the data which the state senate has an absolute right to examine. But that was just half the story. {snip} So, the timeline is: July 7: Senator Mastriano announces his audit. July 8: Acting Secretary of State Degraffenreid orders local officials to obstruct access to the evidence. July 9: President Biden’s handlers schedule a trip to Pennsylvania, obviously to weigh in and force local officials to participate in the cover-up of evidence. Senator Mastriano is not intimidated: More at the link:
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 2 hours ago, BillStime said: ie. voters who blue. “Republicans want every legal voter to be able to cast a legal vote for the candidate of their choice.” Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie puts into effective terms the actual goal of voting reform measures pushed by Republicans. It is a refreshing counter to some of the outlandish mischaracterizations that have been made by the left. Facts matter. A leftist narrative takes a shellacking. So important from @GovChristie If Texas Democrats walk out again, they’ll effectively block those expanded ballot access efforts. And they’re doing it for theater, because they know COVID drive-through voting was never meant to be permanent.
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: “Republicans want every legal voter to be able to cast a legal vote for the candidate of their choice.” Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie puts into effective terms the actual goal of voting reform measures pushed by Republicans. It is a refreshing counter to some of the outlandish mischaracterizations that have been made by the left. Facts matter. A leftist narrative takes a shellacking. So important from @GovChristie If Texas Democrats walk out again, they’ll effectively block those expanded ballot access efforts. And they’re doing it for theater, because they know COVID drive-through voting was never meant to be permanent. How many illegal votes were cast in 2020?
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: How many illegal votes were cast in 2020? No. No more question answered for you. Until you act like an adult poster. Christie's point about democrat party's reaction to legislators trying to re-stabilize our elections is the point...............not an arbitrary number. Your constant refusal to focus on what is being discussed and try to divert is not worth the effort.
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 1 minute ago, B-Man said: No. No more question answered for you. Until you act like an adult poster. Christie's point about democrat party's reaction to legislators trying to re-stabilize our elections is the point...............not an arbitrary number. Your constant refusal to focus on what is being discussed and try to divert is not worth the effort. LMAO - adult poster? The one who spams the board non stop with far right wing garbage OPINIONS? How many illegal votes were discovered in 2020? Why can't you answer the question, Mr Adult Poster you?
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: How many illegal votes were discovered in 2020? Why can't you answer the question, Mr Adult Poster you? You dullard. It's not I can't answer the question, it's I won't answer the question. Because it is a dodge, an evasion, a childish attempt to avoid the point. In other words it is the standard response from a dunce like yourself. Imagine calling other opinions "garbage" when you didn't actually read them. An adult would be embarrassed........................not Billzy.
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 1 minute ago, B-Man said: You dullard. It's not I can't answer the question, it's I won't answer the question. Because it is a dodge, an evasion, a childish attempt to avoid the point. In other words it is the standard response from a dunce like yourself. Imagine calling other opinions "garbage" when you didn't actually read them. An adult would be embarrassed........................not Billzy. You can't answer a simple question... pathetic.
B-Man Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: You can't answer a simple question... pathetic. I would have bet my house that that was going to be your weak-ass response....................you are empty. Meanwhile: Bro, WE KNOW: Democrat straight-up admits they have to cheat to win in 2022 While Democrats are busy trying to scare the crap out of Americans by telling them voting laws protecting their vote will actually SUPPRESS THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE, Rep. Jim Clyburn is saying the quiet part out loud and admitting why they REALLY want to pass this election bill. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2021/07/11/bro-we-know-dem-says-quiet-part-out-loud-admits-they-will-lose-the-house-if-they-cant-squash-the-filibuster-and-pass-election-bill/
BillStime Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: I would have bet my house that that was going to be your weak-ass response....................you are empty. Meanwhile: Bro, WE KNOW: Democrat straight-up admits they have to cheat to win in 2022 While Democrats are busy trying to scare the crap out of Americans by telling them voting laws protecting their vote will actually SUPPRESS THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE, Rep. Jim Clyburn is saying the quiet part out loud and admitting why they REALLY want to pass this election bill. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2021/07/11/bro-we-know-dem-says-quiet-part-out-loud-admits-they-will-lose-the-house-if-they-cant-squash-the-filibuster-and-pass-election-bill/ Your owners are failing you, Bonnie. C'est dommage
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 11, 2021 Posted July 11, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, B-Man said: back to the thread........ https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/definite_sign_of_panic_pennsylvania_acting_secretary_of_state_issues_illegal_orders_to_obstruct_audit_of_2020_election.html Definite sign of panic: Pennsylvania acting Secretary of State issues illegal orders to obstruct audit of 2020 election By Thomas Lifson Yesterday, I wrote that it looks like Pennsylvania Dems are panicking over the audit of the 2020 election announced by State Senator Doug Mastriano, chair of the state senate’s Intergovernmental Operations Committee. Two days after the announcement of the audit, President Biden suddenly was scheduled for a trip to the Keystone State "to deliver remarks on actions to protect the sacred constitutional right to vote." Bringing the “The Big Guy” to pressure officials to obstruct access to the data which the state senate has an absolute right to examine. But that was just half the story. {snip} So, the timeline is: July 7: Senator Mastriano announces his audit. July 8: Acting Secretary of State Degraffenreid orders local officials to obstruct access to the evidence. July 9: President Biden’s handlers schedule a trip to Pennsylvania, obviously to weigh in and force local officials to participate in the cover-up of evidence. Senator Mastriano is not intimidated: https://reports.agorafinancial.com/AWN_creditcard_071911_op/EAWNM849/index.htm;jsessionid=CF85FE44A0B2C1ED534E3FEDF6E6AA62?pageNumber=2More at the link: This is representative of the core problem. Confidence. It doesn't matter if there was election fraud or not. It doesn't matter if people casting votes were not eligible to cast a vote. It doesn't matter if the "process" was fair or not. It doesn't matter who won. We can argue and debate the finer points of the election law or results until the Sun burns out and who is right or wrong won't matter. What matters is if there was election fraud a very large number of citizens know with 100% certainty that the officials running the system, the official responsible for overseeing the system, the media reporting on it, and everyone else involved would all lie about it whether or not it happened. And would not investigate anything, would not look to find anything, and would obstruct and inhibit any audits and recounts by doing everything and anything they could to stop anyone else from finding any problems anywhere. The record to date supports this view. We are at the point of "systemic corruption". Where every institution, not just those connected to the elections, is viewed as corrupt. Its like Operation Mindcrime track 3. Its not Democrats vs. Republicans, or liberals vs, conservatives, or left vs, right. Its corruption and the consequences of corruption embedded in a lawless and self-serving government supported by its co-beneficiaries in the private sector such as big tech. Right now what's in short supply is honesty and integrity. Edited July 11, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Doc Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 3 hours ago, BillStime said: How many illegal votes were cast in 2020? As many as the number of people who will be suppressed from voting because of the new election laws.
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 12, 2021 Author Posted July 12, 2021 7 minutes ago, Doc said: As many as the number of people who will be suppressed from voting because of the new election laws. I am sorry Doc but that is not true- fraud is something you hide but if you are being oppressed or suppressed you scream it from the mountain tops. No one is being suppressed but all elections have fraud.
Recommended Posts