Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

And not a word about guns.

 

The guy passed a background check.  But I would be in favor of a waiting period.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

So...wouldn't this be an argument against registering to vote on the same day?  Because bad things happen?

 

And why are people being registered on voting day?  If you didn't care enough in your life before, why wait until the actual day?  Because someone comes to your house and offers you something to do it?  How about...going to get them voter ID?

 

I didn't realize I needed to exercise my rights in advance in this country.  That's an . . . interesting . . . theory. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It probably would make it worse.  In a nutshell, what you want with that plan is to either severely limit or end absentee voting.  Not because there's any problem with it--no allegations of meaningful fraud in 2020--but because Trump spun a hoax/lie about voter fraud that you've bought into and that has caused you to mistakenly believe there is some security risk with respect to our electoral process that requires correction.  It's interesting that the only place that feels compelled to address these "problems" in this fashion is Georgia, which was ground zero for the Trump hoax/Trump election interference efforts. 


So is this what the Bill is all about?  

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

I didn't realize I needed to exercise my rights in advance in this country.  That's an . . . interesting . . . theory. 

 

Do you need to vote?  If voting is so vitally important, why treat it like a joke?

Posted
17 hours ago, Wacka said:

But the democrat party that supported slavery, wrote the Jim Crow laws, founded the KKK, had a senator that was a KKK kleagle, and filibustered civil rights laws  is not racist?

 

Nope.  That was generations ago.  Applying that logic, you're probably for such things as reparations for slavery and punishing Columbus's relatives for the diseased blanket issue.  

Just now, Doc said:

 

Do you need to vote?  If voting is so vitally important, why treat it like a joke?

 

You have an odd definition of joke.  But, given some of your other theories, that's not surprising. 

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:


So is this what the Bill is all about?  

 

Which bill?

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

The guy passed a background check.  But I would be in favor of a waiting period.


Got it - so we can run out and buy a gun the same day and kill as many people as you want without thought but you are worried someone is going to register to f’n VOTE same day because they were influenced by someone?

 

Are you nuts?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It probably would make it worse.  In a nutshell, what you want with that plan is to either severely limit or end absentee voting.  Not because there's any problem with it--no allegations of meaningful fraud in 2020--but because Trump spun a hoax/lie about voter fraud that you've bought into and that has caused you to mistakenly believe there is some security risk with respect to our electoral process that requires correction.  It's interesting that the only place that feels compelled to address these "problems" in this fashion is Georgia, which was ground zero for the Trump hoax/Trump election interference efforts. 

 

Absurd to suggest that the affected class need be entirely African-American.  How about majority African-American?  Or critical mass AA?  Nah.  Extremists like you deal in extremes.  We should expect nothing less. 


If it’s to be considered Jim Crow wouldn’t have to adversely affect only Black people. Or target only black people?  I’ll answer for you. YES!  Now on to the proof you must have to come to this conclusion.  

4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Which bill?


The Jim Crow on steroids one. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


Awe - that’s really cute. 🤗

 

But cmon - it’s really about making this possible...

 

Trump Urged Georgia Officials to Find Votes, Flip State to Him


...meanwhile the GQP wants YOU to focus on absentee ballots (oh and for you ballot harvesting).

 

So Mister Independent and above the fray as always...

 

 

  • Vomit 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Awe - that’s really cute. 🤗

 

But cmon - it’s really about making this possible...

 

Trump Urged Georgia Officials to Find Votes, Flip State to Him


...meanwhile the GQP wants YOU to focus on absentee ballots (oh and for you ballot harvesting).

 

So Mister Independent and above the fray as always...

 

 


Wait so it’s not Jim Crow then now? 🙄 and ID restrictions help Trump in that scenario above? How about water? 

 

Your  incoherence is tough to track. 
 

Democrats fear republicans obstructing to their “voter outreach” institutions, which amounts to harvesting. 
 

Anyone with half a brain can read the HR1 and the conflicting Georgia law and see this is the power struggle on legality of harvesting votes from the apathetic voters plain and simple. Democrats are better at it and republicans know it. 

 

 

Especially in densely populated democratic cities that can swing states. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

That claim has always been spurious at best.  How do you catch people voting illegally if you're not checking ID? 

 

Meanwhile the claim that since voting is a right that it should be as easy as possible is a fallacy.  Owning a gun is a right yet it's not easy, much less cheap.  So that dog doesn't hunt either.

 

If you are seriously comparing voting to what someone can do with a gun, then we arent in the same realities.

 

Plus, I can walk into any Walmart or Dick's near me and walk out with a gun today.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


Wait so it’s not Jim Crow then now? 🙄 and ID restrictions help Trump in that scenario above? How about water? 

 

Your  incoherence is tough to track. 
 

Democrats fear republicans obstructing to their “voter outreach” institutions, which amounts to harvesting. 
 

Anyone with half a brain can read the HR1 and the conflicting Georgia law and see this is the power struggle on legality of harvesting votes from the apathetic voters plain and simple. Democrats are better at it and republicans know it. 

 

 

Especially in densely populated democratic cities that can swing states. 


The writers of this law did an amazing job confusing you simpletons.... none of you will honestly address the blatant power shift - because you know you can’t defend it. 
 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BillStime said:


The writers of this law did an amazing job confusing you simpletons.... none of you will honestly address the blatant power shift - because you know you can’t defend it. 
 

 

Sure alt left sheep Bot.. good luck with your parties blatant attempt to federalize election control and keep screaming about republicans impotent half hearted effort to address it as Jim Crow, water bans! Racist!!! Fear!!!!! Doooooom!!!!!!! 
 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Especially in densely populated democratic cities that can swing states. 


So what you’re saying is - Democrats make it easier for EVERYONE to

vote - while the GQP adds hurdles to counter those huge massive Democratic counties in swing states.

 

Got it

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


So what you’re saying is - Democrats make it easier for EVERYONE to

vote - while the GQP adds hurdles to counter those huge massive Democratic counties in swing states.

 

Got it

I’m laughing at you...

 

sure bud.  It’s good guys vs bad guys. Your masters are pure and well intentioned 😂 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Sure alt left sheep Bot.. good luck with your parties blatant attempt to federalize election control and keep screaming about republicans impotent half hearted effort to address it as Jim Crow, water bans! Racist!!! Fear!!!!! Doooooom!!!!!!! 
 

 


This thread has already demonstrated the need to federalize elections. Many here posted Fox related images highlighting the disparity between voting laws in NY and Georgia - those doing so didn’t even realize they were codifying the need for universal voting laws.

 

The problem is - fanboy - the GQP is a dying party - devoid of ideas - and their response is to curb voter turnout - because they know they don’t have enough voters to beat Democrats - hence the need for that special election committee appointed by the GQP legislature and Governor - only way to counter, throw out and not certify those votes in large blue counties. 

 

And the funny thing - you would think the GQP in Georgia would have learned by now - Stacey Adams already proved that when the GQP raises the “bar” - she will get the turnout to jump over it. This will backfire on the GQP.

 

 

12 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I’m laughing at you...

 

sure bud.  It’s good guys vs bad guys. Your masters are pure and well intentioned 😂 


And you always stick up for the bad guys - we have your entire history here doing so - Mister Independent. 

Edited by BillStime
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Awe - that’s really cute. 🤗

 

But cmon - it’s really about making this possible...

 

Trump Urged Georgia Officials to Find Votes, Flip State to Him


...meanwhile the GQP wants YOU to focus on absentee ballots (oh and for you ballot harvesting).

 

So Mister Independent and above the fray as always...

 

 


I thought it was racist?   Why have you gone away from that narrative?  

Edited by Chef Jim
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


I thought it was racist?   Why have you gone away from that narrative?  


Oh it is...you don’t think the special GQP committee is going to touch white suburban/rural votes do ya?

 

idiots

Posted
1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Oh it is...you don’t think the special GQP committee is going to touch white suburban/rural votes do ya?

 

idiots


So this law unfairly affects urban areas?  

×
×
  • Create New...