Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 4/6/2021 at 2:14 PM, warrior9 said:

Right, but this isn't college. I think this just makes the NFL look elementary.

 

That's just my opinion, though. I'm sure people don't mind it.

Expand  

I don’t know why the chiefs care about it, I’m just saying that some players carry over that mentality from college 

Posted
  On 4/6/2021 at 1:49 PM, Boxcar said:

Yeah I got that now. Players switch positions so often that they often have to abandon their old number because it isn't allowed. I don't think it would bother me to see a LB with a single digit number but it might just be something to get used to. I'm normally for more player freedom, and I don't really see the harm.

Expand  


Players that switch positions are not required to change numbers unless they change teams. (At least that is how it used to be, I think it is still this way?)

 

Also, I hate this idea. I’m a traditionalist. I still hate WR’s in teens and LB’s in 40’s. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
  On 4/6/2021 at 1:42 PM, YoloinOhio said:

The single digit #s are highly coveted in college

Expand  

 

I never understood why wr's and rb's couldn't wear single digits. 

 

But wr's wearing 20-40's and rb's wearing 80's don't make no kinda sense. 

Posted

Travis Henry would have applied for #420. It’s unclear whether that is his favorite day of the year, or the number of his children at this point.... 

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...