Derek Chauvin Trial

[Melon]

 

[B-Man]

 

If the Minneapolis Star Tribune wanted to get the Derek Chauvin trial jurors killed, what would they be doing differently?

 

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/04/20/if-the-minneapolis-star-tribune-wanted-to-get-the-derek-chauvin-trial-jurors-killed-what-would-they-be-doing-differently/

 

 

Edited April 20, 2021 by B-Man

[\GoBillsInDallas/]

 

[T&C]

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

If the Minneapolis Star Tribune wanted to get the Derek Chauvin trial jurors killed, what would they be doing differently?

 

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/04/20/if-the-minneapolis-star-tribune-wanted-to-get-the-derek-chauvin-trial-jurors-killed-what-would-they-be-doing-differently/

 

 

Jeebus... what has happened to this country. It literally feels and looks like gameday... just waiting for the whistle to blow (Chauvin verdict). 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

8 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

If the Minneapolis Star Tribune wanted to get the Derek Chauvin trial jurors killed, what would they be doing differently?

 

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/04/20/if-the-minneapolis-star-tribune-wanted-to-get-the-derek-chauvin-trial-jurors-killed-what-would-they-be-doing-differently/

 

 

The only question for me is that if and when there is fallout, and one of the jurors or family members are hurt, injured, threatened or killed*, is retribution against the reporter fair?  
 

*Our friend Logic would insist here that we make it clear that said injury/death/destruction must be considered in context, and in this case would only occur because the jurors were selected to sit in judgement on a very volatile and horrific  dealing with an case that’s very complex and involves the death of a man in police custody, and that the juror(s) may share culpability in some unknown way/shape/form because people are fed up with in associated parties unknown to them.  I hope that I have done justice to the notion of context. 

9 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

He put the ‘ass’ in asphalt!  

[Tiberius]

26 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

If the Minneapolis Star Tribune wanted to get the Derek Chauvin trial jurors killed, what would they be doing differently?

 

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/04/20/if-the-minneapolis-star-tribune-wanted-to-get-the-derek-chauvin-trial-jurors-killed-what-would-they-be-doing-differently/

 

 

Did they print the jurors names? 

[Melon]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Did they print the jurors names? 

 

At the same time, right wing media is practically begging for an acquittal so they can say I TOLD YOU SO when property is damaged. 

 

These are the same Trump cultists who screamed from the rooftops the name of the alleged Ukraine whistleblower.

 

SAY HIS NAME they yelled and yelled. A prominent lawmaker even doxed him during the impeachment trial.

On 11/12/2019 at 12:34 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

Abusing His Office to Enrich Himself

 

 

yes. -  Eric Ciaramella 

 

no. —  the President 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

This poster led the way. Is it the same B-Man who is worried about the jurors getting doxed? It can't be.

[B-Man]

7 minutes ago, Melon said:

 

 

This poster led the way. Is it the same B-Man who is worried about the jurors getting doxed? It can't be.

 

 

LOL.

 

Comparing the open secret of that person's name (where do you think I got it ) with the disclosure of jurors names ?

 

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that nonsense.

 

 

 

 

Iv'e decided. The thought of you looking through 2 year old posts makes me laugh.

 

 

 

 

HERE YOU GO.

 

This is sad and funny too.

 

 

[Melon]

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Comparing the open secret of that person's name (where do you think I got it ) with the disclosure of jurors names ?

 

Both are wrong.

 

Of course a partisan like yourself sees doxing the whistleblower as fine even if his name is an "open secret."

 

 

Edited April 20, 2021 by Melon

[Unforgiven]

38 minutes ago, T&C said:

Jeebus... what has happened to this country. It literally feels and looks like gameday... just waiting for the whistle to blow (Chauvin verdict). 

Gameday? These folks are openly encouraging violence and murder.

Once again lefties prove they are what the accuse others of, <<Alinsky>>

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

12 minutes ago, Melon said:

 

Both are wrong.

 

Of course a partisan like yourself sees doxing the whistleblower as fine even if his name is an "open secret."

 

 

I’m not so sure both are wrong.  One clearly is, the desire to shield citizens from harm and protect the integrity of our justice system.  
 

The approach to whistleblower protection is complicated at best.  A whistleblower providing sealed testimony about known deficiencies in the Tesla auto pilot system is one thing, a political operative claiming he heard someone say that someone else said something as they passed the lunch lounge is another.  It’s often the equivalent of the unnamed source deep within spewing manipulative crap to shape a narrative. 
 

I’d think some common ground could be found here.  These people deserve anonymity, and some douche with a press pass sniffing around their jock ain’t doing nothing for the greater good.  

[B-Man]

Biden says he’s “praying the verdict is the right verdict” in Chauvin Trial

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/04/biden-says-hes-praying-the-verdict-is-the-right-verdict-in-chauvin-trial/

 

So Biden, who likely only knows the evidence in the case from the mainstream media, is setting up to excuse riots and looting if there is the “wrong verdict.”

 

He doesn’t say that, of course, but that’s what he’s doing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Melon]

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

These people deserve anonymity

 

Bingo. That's the crux.

 

 

[T&C]

26 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Gameday? These folks are openly encouraging violence and murder.

Once again lefties prove they are what the accuse others of, <<Alinsky>>

 

That's what I meant... all good until the verdict comes in and then hell breaks loose. Sad state of affairs really.

[Motorin']

19 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Biden says he’s “praying the verdict is the right verdict” in Chauvin Trial

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/04/biden-says-hes-praying-the-verdict-is-the-right-verdict-in-chauvin-trial/

 

So Biden, who likely only knows the evidence in the case from the mainstream media, is setting up to excuse riots and looting if there is the “wrong verdict.”

 

He doesn’t say that, of course, but that’s what he’s doing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or he isn't buying the sadistic line of arguments that what Chauvindid was perfectly OK and legally justified. 

 

For all of the criticism of protest and potential riots, the right has some sick sick people commenting on why Chauvin is a hero and did nothing wrong. 

 

To quote the guy who hand delivered a box of doughnuts to the four officers on the day of the Rodney King beating verdict, they are heros because they are "beating the jungle back."

 

You have to be sick to buy the defense argument that it is OK for police to kneel on the necks of handcuffed citizens with no pulse. 

 

And no matter what your political beliefs, if you don't recognize that a not guilty verdict sends the signal that it is OK for police to slowly murder black men in 2021, then your head is up your ass. 

 

 

Edited April 20, 2021 by Motorin'

[Boatdrinks]

18 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Biden says he’s “praying the verdict is the right verdict” in Chauvin Trial

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/04/biden-says-hes-praying-the-verdict-is-the-right-verdict-in-chauvin-trial/

 

So Biden, who likely only knows the evidence in the case from the mainstream media, is setting up to excuse riots and looting if there is the “wrong verdict.”

 

He doesn’t say that, of course, but that’s what he’s doing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wow, the moron weighs in , hoping for the “ right” verdict ? There’s a ight and wrong verdict now, regardless of what the jury decides was proven in a court of law ? What a complete joke of a President. 

[Motorin']

Just now, Boatdrinks said:

Wow, the moron weighs in , hoping for the “ right” verdict ? There’s a ight and wrong verdict now, regardless of what the jury decides was proven in a court of law ? What a complete joke of a President. 

 

You're clueless. 

[Melon]

2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

For all of the criticism of protest and potential riots, the right has some sick sick people commenting on why Chauvin is a hero and did nothing wrong. 

 

If he is acquitted, there will be Republicans falling over each other to have Chauvin in their corner.

[wnyguy]

3 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Or he isn't buying the sadistic line of arguments that what Chauvindid was perfectly OK and legally justified. 

 

For all of the criticism of protest and potential riots, the right has some sick sick people commenting on why Chauvin is a hero and did nothing wrong. 

 

To quote the guy who hand delivered a box of doughnuts to the four officers on the day of the Rodney King beating verdict, they are heros because they are "beating the jungle back."

 

You have to be sick to buy the defense argument that it is OK for police to kneel on the necks of handcuffed citizens with no pulse. 

 

And no matter what your political beliefs, if you don't recognize that a not guilty verdict sends the signal that it is OK for police to slowly murder black men in 2021, then your head is up your ass. 

 

 

Please point me to anyone on the right saying Chauvin is a hero. Thanks in advance.

1 minute ago, Melon said:

 

If he is acquitted, there will be Republicans falling over each other to have Chauvin in their corner.

To do what?

[Boatdrinks]

Just now, Melon said:

 

If he is acquitted, there will be Republicans falling over each other to have Chauvin in their corner.

Total BS. Why would they ?