Doc Posted November 4, 2022 Posted November 4, 2022 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Of course. THE NEW ANTIRACISM LOOKS AN AWFUL LOT LIKE THE OLD RACISM: ‘Anti-racist’ professor calls Herschel Walker ‘subliterate,’ uses racial slur. https://www.thecollegefix.com/anti-racist-professor-calls-herschel-walker-subliterate-uses-racial-slur/ What a POS. 1 1
B-Man Posted November 18, 2022 Posted November 18, 2022 SEGREGATION TODAY, SEGREGATION TOMORROW, SEGREGATION FOREVER! UCSB Black Student Union asks white peers not to attend free ‘Wakanda Forever’ screening. https://www.thecollegefix.com/ucsb-black-student-union-asks-white-peers-not-to-attend-free-wakanda-forever-screening/ . 1
B-Man Posted November 20, 2022 Posted November 20, 2022 American Bar Association Drops LSAT for Law School Applications - Any Guesses Why? I know — it reads like a satirical headline from The Babylon Bee, right? The American Bar Association (ABA), the national voice of the legal profession, which prides itself on “serving the public and the profession by promoting justice, professional excellence, and respect for the law,” will no longer require the administering of the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) for law school applications, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. I can solve this oxymoronic problem in six words: The soft bigotry of low expectations. According to the WSJ, the ABA’s accrediting council, comprised of lawyers, law professors, and administrators voted 15-1 to drop the requirement that law school applicants take — and pass — the LSAT or any other “valid and reliable admission test,” amid a debate about whether the tests — wait for it — help or hurt diversity in admissions. Sounds like a great idea, right? Next, let’s drop the minimum requirements for physics and other science majors — mathematics, as well. I’m sure the left can ring up the ChiComs and they’ll gladly climb aboard, too. I mean, why wouldn’t they? No, wait. Individual law schools are still free to require the LSAT or any reliable admission test, according to the ABA. The policy change will take effect beginning for students applying in fall 2025. https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/11/19/american-bar-association-drops-law-school-admissions-test-for-law-school-applications-any-guesses-n661445 1
B-Man Posted December 5, 2022 Posted December 5, 2022 HOW DARE THEY REALISTICALLY REPRESENT BLACKS AS COMPLEX THREE-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS? Tim Burton’s ‘Wednesday’ called ‘racist’ for casting black actors as bullies. https://nypost.com/2022/11/30/tim-burtons-wednesday-called-racist-for-casting-black-actors-as-bullies/ 2
JaCrispy Posted December 5, 2022 Posted December 5, 2022 4 hours ago, B-Man said: HOW DARE THEY REALISTICALLY REPRESENT BLACKS AS COMPLEX THREE-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS? Tim Burton’s ‘Wednesday’ called ‘racist’ for casting black actors as bullies. https://nypost.com/2022/11/30/tim-burtons-wednesday-called-racist-for-casting-black-actors-as-bullies/ I don’t understand why this is an issue…Don’t black criminals need representation too? 😉
B-Man Posted December 12, 2022 Posted December 12, 2022 A nine-member school board in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania voted for a new president of the board last week. Two of the nine were running to be the new president. One was a “cis, white male” and the other a female. One board member gave her reason for voting for the female candidate instead of the male candidate – it would “send the wrong message to our community.” She said the quiet part out loud. I find it disgusting that we have come to this place in our society. A person is chosen for their gender, or their skin color instead of basic qualifications. This is blatant discrimination and it’s got to stop. Is this what the Civil Rights movement was about – punish a person for his skin color or his sexuality if the person isn’t the best show of diversity? What happened to Martin Luther King’s words about judging someone for the content of his character, not the color of his skin? In this case I think the biggest disqualifying maker for Gregory D’Elia wasn’t his skin color or sexuality but his gender. He was the only cis, white male on the board. Ironically his presence was the very definition of diversity on the board. The others, apparently, are either female or perhaps the male seen in the video is not cisgender. https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2022/12/12/saying-the-quiet-part-out-loud-pa-school-board-member-refuses-to-support-cis-white-male-for-president-n517147 1
B-Man Posted December 12, 2022 Posted December 12, 2022 On 9/12/2022 at 4:19 PM, B-Man said: Oberlin Defamed A Bakery Rather Than Hold A Shoplifter Accountable. It’s Now $36 Million Poorer. The media elite and left-wing colleges desperately wanted to make the Gibson’s Brothers Inc. v. Oberlin Oberlin College case about “academic freedom.” Anybody who actually read the facts (brought to many of us through the incomparable work of Legal Insurrection‘s William Jacobson) knew that was utter horseshit. Oberlin’s defenders tried — through the pages of The New York Times and other usual suspects — that the college was unfairly being punished for students’ speech. But those weren’t the facts: A jury learned that Oberlin administrators helped the defamatory fliers to be made with Oberlin-owned equipment; Oberlin staff participated in handing out the flyers; and worse yet, Oberlin officials attempted to prevent a local news photographer from recording the scene. The speech at issue was Oberlin’s as much as the students’. Frederick Hess, American Enterprise Institute’s director of education policy studies revisited the case in Forbes a few days ago, and the headline really says it all: “Oberlin Defamed A Bakery Rather Than Hold A Shoplifter Accountable. It’s Now $36 Million Poorer.” Hess paints the background first: “When the incident first occurred, because the shoplifters were black, the Oberlin community quickly accused Gibson’s of racism and discrimination in a series of high-profile attacks. Gibson’s and the college had a longstanding relationship, students regularly frequented the bakery, and there had been no prior suggestion that the owners or employees were racist. All of that context was conveniently ignored.” And why did Oberlin avoid using common sense? Hess explains quite simply: “Why did Oberlin defame a longtime partner rather than simply confront three students who’d engaged in misconduct? One former administrator wondered if Oberlin was simply fearful of angering students, musing, “A freshman from an East Coast big city might come to Oberlin and find there is little for a social justice warrior to do in a small town like this, so they get frustrated and make issues like this shoplifting thing bigger than it should be, and the school follows along.” Truly, the inmates are running the asylum. Having followed the case closely, one legal sidenote of interest continues to bug me. Laughably, in motion practice, Oberlin’s defense lawyers tried to argue that being called a racist was not defamatory. This ought to blow any wokist’s mind. The president of the college even admitted under oath that “being called a racist was possibly the worst thing you can say about someone.” Odder yet, I can’t find any use by the defense of Ohio’s “innocent construction” rule. Ohio is one of the few states with a rule in civil law that if a statement can be interpreted in an innocuous way, then that is the meaning which must be ascribed to it. (I litigated the same issue with success in the First Circuit where a libel plaintiff insisted that calling his store “trashy” meant it was literally strewn with garbage. The court did not buy it). Hess ends his Op/Ed with a cautionary note every educator ought to read: “Oberlin’s grown-ups had an obligation to teach students there are consequences for misconduct and to help ensure that justice was done. Instead, they found it more expedient to defame a community business and ravage the owners’ lives. Well, Oberlin is finally paying for that mistake. Campus officials, there and elsewhere, should take note.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2022/09/09/oberlin-defamed-a-bakery-rather-than-hold-a-shoplifter-accountable-its-now-36-million-poorer/amp/ Finally, The Gibson’s Bakery Family Has Been Paid By Oberlin College. https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/12/finally-the-gibsons-bakery-family-has-been-paid-by-oberlin-college/ .
B-Man Posted December 22, 2022 Posted December 22, 2022 Racism raises Alzheimer’s risk for non-white Americans, HHS says by Peter Kasperowicz “Entrenched systemic racism” is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia in non-white Americans, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) claimed in its 2022 update on how to fight the disease. The HHS’ “National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease” said black, Hispanic and low-income populations are more likely to face health-related risk factors that contribute to Alzheimer’s and said this disparity is due to “structural inequities” that are the result of racism. https://nypost.com/2022/12/20/racism-raises-alzheimers-risk-for-non-white-americans-hhs-says/ False.
Orlando Buffalo Posted December 23, 2022 Posted December 23, 2022 21 hours ago, B-Man said: Racism raises Alzheimer’s risk for non-white Americans, HHS says by Peter Kasperowicz “Entrenched systemic racism” is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia in non-white Americans, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) claimed in its 2022 update on how to fight the disease. The HHS’ “National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease” said black, Hispanic and low-income populations are more likely to face health-related risk factors that contribute to Alzheimer’s and said this disparity is due to “structural inequities” that are the result of racism. https://nypost.com/2022/12/20/racism-raises-alzheimers-risk-for-non-white-americans-hhs-says/ False. Wow, that is amazing that I control whether my neighbors get Alzheimer's, in another universe next this report would be considered white privilege.
SoCal Deek Posted December 23, 2022 Posted December 23, 2022 22 hours ago, B-Man said: Racism raises Alzheimer’s risk for non-white Americans, HHS says by Peter Kasperowicz “Entrenched systemic racism” is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia in non-white Americans, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) claimed in its 2022 update on how to fight the disease. The HHS’ “National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease” said black, Hispanic and low-income populations are more likely to face health-related risk factors that contribute to Alzheimer’s and said this disparity is due to “structural inequities” that are the result of racism. https://nypost.com/2022/12/20/racism-raises-alzheimers-risk-for-non-white-americans-hhs-says/ False. What’s fascinating is how even with the clear and present danger of this lurking health problem in their advanced years half of the Hispanic world appears to be willing to pay smugglers, stand in the freezing cold desert, and then walk through a moving river just for the chance to experience all of this systemic racism for themselves.
B-Man Posted January 11, 2023 Posted January 11, 2023 Using the term "field" is racist or something “Field.” The word “field” must be banned, lest black people be triggered. I have yet to meet a black person triggered by the word, but undoubtedly some social worker will find one after a decade of searching. Is there some sort of competition of which I am not aware? Find the racism inherent in word X? Or is this just garden-variety idiocy, of which we find an infinite variety in academia? https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/01/10/using-the-term-field-is-racist-or-something-n522836 . 1 2
B-Man Posted January 13, 2023 Posted January 13, 2023 UNC Chapel Hill Art Club Welcomes All Students but White Ones By Alex Parker https://redstate.com/alexparker/2023/01/13/unc-chapel-hill-art-club-welcomes-all-students-but-white-ones-n687952
gobills404 Posted January 13, 2023 Posted January 13, 2023 You can be openly racist towards white people and face no repercussions whatsoever, yet people will still say America is a white supremacist country with a straight face 1
B-Man Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 BECAUSE OF COURSE: USA Today Pitching ‘Anti-Asian Hate’ Long After They Knew the Killer Was Asian. “Even if we cannot be sure an attack was racial in intent, it nonetheless can be racial in effect.” https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2023/01/23/usa-today-pitching-anti-asian-hate-long-after-they-knew-the-killer-was-asian-n1664112 . 1
B-Man Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 Speaking of "anti-Asian" WHY DO LEFTIST EDUCRATS HATE ASIANS SO MUCH? 17 Northern Virginia Schools Withheld Merit Awards From Mostly Asian Students As Gov Calls For Legislation. “About 75% of semifinalists for the National Merit award that were not notified were Asian students, the Fairfax County Times reported.” UPDATE: From the comments: “Are we supposed to believe that 17 schools decided upon this course of action independently? It was obviously coordinated from a central entity. What is that central entity?” https://dailycaller.com/2023/01/19/17-northern-virginia-schools-withheld-merit-awards-asian-students-legislation/ . 1
Doc Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 4 hours ago, B-Man said: BECAUSE OF COURSE: USA Today Pitching ‘Anti-Asian Hate’ Long After They Knew the Killer Was Asian. “Even if we cannot be sure an attack was racial in intent, it nonetheless can be racial in effect.” https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2023/01/23/usa-today-pitching-anti-asian-hate-long-after-they-knew-the-killer-was-asian-n1664112 A "white Asian" no doubt. Or it's "the Asian face of white nationalism."
BillsFanNC Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Breakfast, lunch and dinner? Yup, racist. 2
Recommended Posts