Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/34510145/south-carolina-dawn-staley-cancel-byu-women-basketball-games-racial-incident-volleyball-game

 

This is disgusting by Staley to give credence to the allegation, if you are paying attention this girl had a bad game vs BYU and lied that someone was racially abusing her repeatedly. Of course the game is on video, and no one else heard it, and the guy she accused can be seen on video not yelling anything at her, but why let that bother you when you can get your annual headline for not doing your job?

 

 

This story is another sham knew it was b.s. from the start:

 

 

Video Shows That Duke Volleyball Player And Her Politician Godmother Are Lying About Being Called N Word During BYU Game

 

 

Screen-Shot-2022-08-29-at-3.31.58-PM-e16

 

 

https://tbdailynews.com/video-shows-that-duke-volleyball-player-and-her-politician-godmother-are-lying-about-being-called-n-word-during-byu-game/

 

 

 

Duke women's volleyball player's racial-slur claim comes under scrutiny

 

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/duke-womens-volleyball-players-racial-slur-claim-comes-scrutiny

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
On 9/3/2022 at 12:50 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

 

This story is another sham knew it was b.s. from the start:

 

 

Video Shows That Duke Volleyball Player And Her Politician Godmother Are Lying About Being Called N Word During BYU Game

 

 

Screen-Shot-2022-08-29-at-3.31.58-PM-e16

 

 

https://tbdailynews.com/video-shows-that-duke-volleyball-player-and-her-politician-godmother-are-lying-about-being-called-n-word-during-byu-game/

 

 

 

Duke women's volleyball player's racial-slur claim comes under scrutiny

 

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/duke-womens-volleyball-players-racial-slur-claim-comes-scrutiny

This story sums up the left.

BULL^%$#.

All they are doing is actually making people hate.

Literally, a racist war targeting white non democrats.

Filthy lying animals.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 4/1/2022 at 11:42 AM, aristocrat said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-upholds-bakery-32-million-141320346.html

 

Brittany Bernstein

Fri, April 1, 2022, 7:13 AM

An Ohio appeals court has upheld a ruling that awarded more than $30 million to a bakery that accused Oberlin College of damaging its business and libeling it with false accusations of racism.

A three-judge panel on the Ninth District Court of Appeals issued a unanimous decision to uphold a 2019 ruling by Lorain County Judge John Miraldi, who initially awarded the bakery more than $40 million in punitive and compensatory damages, Cleveland.com reported. However, the sum was later reduced to $25 million, though the bakery was awarded more than $6 million for lawyers’ fees.

Gibson’s Bakery sued the college in 2017, accusing the school and one of its administrators of hurting its business and libeling it over an incident in which the son of the bakery owner stopped three black Oberlin College students, one of whom was stealing wine bottles from the store, in November 2016.

 

https://www.morningjournal.com/2022/09/08/oberlin-college-initiates-payment-of-awarded-damages-in-gibsons-bakery-case/

 

Posted
1 hour ago, aristocrat said:

 

Wow. Talk about hitting the lotto. Get woke go broke. 

 

 

Not quite.

 

They worked years and endured boycotts and slurs to get that verdict.

 

They knew that they were in the right and fought back against the Left.

 

The elder Gibson even died during this.

 

They earned it.

 

.

Posted
5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

MORE ON THE ABOVE.

 

Oberlin Defamed A Bakery Rather Than Hold A Shoplifter Accountable. It’s Now $36 Million Poorer.

 

The media elite and left-wing colleges desperately wanted to make the Gibson’s Brothers Inc. v. Oberlin Oberlin College case about “academic freedom.”  Anybody who actually read the facts (brought to many of us through the incomparable work of Legal Insurrection‘s William Jacobson) knew that was utter horseshit.

 

Oberlin’s defenders tried — through the pages of The New York Times and other usual suspects — that the college was unfairly being punished for students’ speech. But those weren’t the facts: A jury learned that Oberlin administrators helped the defamatory fliers to be made with Oberlin-owned equipment; Oberlin staff participated in handing out the flyers; and worse yet, Oberlin officials attempted to prevent a local news photographer from recording the scene. The speech at issue was Oberlin’s as much as the students’.

 

Frederick Hess, American Enterprise Institute’s director of education policy studies revisited the case in Forbes a few days ago, and the headline really says it all: “Oberlin Defamed A Bakery Rather Than Hold A Shoplifter Accountable. It’s Now $36 Million Poorer.”

 

Hess paints the background first:

“When the incident first occurred, because the shoplifters were black, the Oberlin community quickly accused Gibson’s of racism and discrimination in a series of high-profile attacks. Gibson’s and the college had a longstanding relationship, students regularly frequented the bakery, and there had been no prior suggestion that the owners or employees were racist. All of that context was conveniently ignored.”

 

And why did Oberlin avoid using common sense? Hess explains quite simply:

 

“Why did Oberlin defame a longtime partner rather than simply confront three students who’d engaged in misconduct? One former administrator wondered if Oberlin was simply fearful of angering students, musing, “A freshman from an East Coast big city might come to Oberlin and find there is little for a social justice warrior to do in a small town like this, so they get frustrated and make issues like this shoplifting thing bigger than it should be, and the school follows along.”

 

Truly, the inmates are running the asylum. Having followed the case closely, one legal sidenote of interest continues to bug me.  Laughably, in motion practice, Oberlin’s defense lawyers tried to argue that being called a racist was not defamatory. This ought to blow any wokist’s mind. The president of the college even admitted under oath that “being called a racist was possibly the worst thing you can say about someone.” Odder yet, I can’t find any use by the defense of Ohio’s “innocent construction” rule. Ohio is one of the few states with a rule in civil law that if a statement can be interpreted in an innocuous way, then that is the meaning which must be ascribed to it. (I litigated the same issue with success in the First Circuit where a libel plaintiff insisted that calling his store “trashy” meant it was literally strewn with garbage. The court did not buy it).

 

Hess ends his Op/Ed with a cautionary note every educator ought to read:

 

“Oberlin’s grown-ups had an obligation to teach students there are consequences for misconduct and to help ensure that justice was done. Instead, they found it more expedient to defame a community business and ravage the owners’ lives. Well, Oberlin is finally paying for that mistake. Campus officials, there and elsewhere, should take note.”

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2022/09/09/oberlin-defamed-a-bakery-rather-than-hold-a-shoplifter-accountable-its-now-36-million-poorer/amp/

I remember when this initially happened that a some students actually claimed that the business allowed white students to shop lift but not the black ones, when I read that I knew the whole thing was bogus and I am glad the bakery stood up for themselves.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Red State values 

 

Teenage girl - sex trafficked - raped -

kills rapist/sex trafficker. Conservative Judge sentenced her to pay family $150K. 

 

I wonder… why?

 

Meanwhile:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.8a0d91d39354aee3804ecefc20e69479.jpeg

 

 


PS: Did the Q nuts make a statement? Anything? Or are those only entitled for white people? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


I look forward to a day in the future when we’ll be able to look back on these people as the poser shams that they are. 

 

Absolutely,  but for clarity,  "Titiana McGrath" is a parody account who is trolling these wokesters. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Red State values 

 

Teenage girl - sex trafficked - raped -

kills rapist/sex trafficker. Conservative Judge sentenced her to pay family $150K. 

 

I wonder… why?

 

Meanwhile:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.8a0d91d39354aee3804ecefc20e69479.jpeg

 

 


PS: Did the Q nuts make a statement? Anything? Or are those only entitled for white people? 


did you read what the judge said? It’s law. The laws need to change 

Posted
28 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Des Moines is democrat 


lmao - smfh

 

Lewis has to pay restitution to the man's family under Iowa state law. Polk County District Judge David M Porter stated that the law requires her to pay the restitution despite the extraordinary circumstances of the case as it's a law that has been maintained by the Iowa Supreme Court.

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, BillStime said:


lmao - smfh

 

Lewis has to pay restitution to the man's family under Iowa state law. Polk County District Judge David M Porter stated that the law requires her to pay the restitution despite the extraordinary circumstances of the case as it's a law that has been maintained by the Iowa Supreme Court.

 

 


she was arrested in Des Moines a democrat city.  Yes, the law needs to change. Still a lot of states that haven’t updated them. It’s sad she was living in the streets of the city and had nowhere to turn to. Lot of that in these cities today

Posted
14 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


she was arrested in Des Moines a democrat city.  Yes, the law needs to change. Still a lot of states that haven’t updated them. It’s sad she was living in the streets of the city and had nowhere to turn to. Lot of that in these cities today


lmao - in a red freakn state. 
 

you think trafficking is only a dem thing?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.80409fd468b8b6a46e5cc7522ef03a67.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.8c26fbbc7b2dad9168432f6a50795687.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.0a4d2c99dd75d43a13bd8ae862c8f1cd.jpeg

 

you are terrible at this 

Posted
6 minutes ago, BillStime said:


lmao - in a red freakn state. 
 

you think trafficking is only a dem thing?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.80409fd468b8b6a46e5cc7522ef03a67.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.8c26fbbc7b2dad9168432f6a50795687.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.0a4d2c99dd75d43a13bd8ae862c8f1cd.jpeg

 

you are terrible at this 

Silly Billsy. If I have a photo of me with OJ from back in the day does that make me a supporter of murder? 
 

Posted
3 hours ago, BillStime said:


Oh cool - let’s see

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

 

Trump banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after sex criminal hit on member’s daughter,

 

now show all the weird clinton pictures, George Stepanopolous, Chelseas Handler, Katie Couric who all attended the post jail release party. Then Gates as well. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

 

Trump banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after sex criminal hit on member’s daughter,

 

now show all the weird clinton pictures, George Stepanopolous, Chelseas Handler, Katie Couric who all attended the post jail release party. Then Gates as well. 


I was hoping Deek was gonna show his selfies w OJ… keep up 

×
×
  • Create New...