Jump to content

Combating imaginary racism with actual racism??


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So they diverted the highways away from a straight route and went out of their way to go through black neighborhoods?  Is this really your accusation?   

 

Do you think they were going to plow through wealthy neighborhoods?

 

Do you just ask stupid questions and refuse to do your own homework on any given topic?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Do you think they were going to plow through wealthy neighborhoods?

 

Do you just ask stupid questions and refuse to do your own homework on any given topic?

 

 

 

Of course they're not going to when they have those damn POC to disrupt.  :rolleyes:

 

But seriously you do understand they have to PURCHASE the private land the highways will "plow" through?  Which is more cost effective?  Poor neighborhood or wealthy neighborhoods?   You have heard of eminent domain right?

 

The reason I ask smart questions is allow you to reply with smart answers.  Unfortunately you rarely hold up your end of the debate. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chef Jim said:

 

Of course they're not going to when they have those damn POC to disrupt.  :rolleyes:

 

But seriously you do understand they have to PURCHASE the private land the highways will "plow" through?  Which is more cost effective?  Poor neighborhood or wealthy neighborhoods?   You have heard of eminent domain right?

 

The reason I ask smart questions is allow you to reply with smart answers.  Unfortunately you rarely hold up your end of the debate. 

 

 

 

Exactly, white privilege. Jim, do you defend that approach? Is the system operating as it should when it favors rich people over poorer; particularly POC?  

 

I don't know if you're from Buffalo originally or not but it probably doesn't even register in your mind what was destroyed when the 33 plowed through Humboldt Parkway - urban fabric, communities, families and homes were lost all in the name of white flight. 

 

You've made it perfectly clear over and over again - systemic racism (and heck, even racism itself) does not exist in Jim's world.

 

Your vociferous defense goes in overdrive because that's the world YOU grew up in - a world where the system should privilege YOU  - and the daily privileges YOU receive never register as being special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Exactly, white privilege. Jim, do you defend that approach? Is the system operating as it should when it favors rich people over poorer; particularly POC?  

 

I don't know if you're from Buffalo originally or not but it probably doesn't even register in your mind what was destroyed when the 33 plowed through Humboldt Parkway - urban fabric, communities, families and homes were lost all in the name of white flight. 

 

You've made it perfectly clear over and over again - systemic racism (and heck, even racism itself) does not exist in Jim's world.

 

Your vociferous defense goes in overdrive because that's the world YOU grew up in - a world where the system should privilege YOU  - and the daily privileges YOU receive never register as being special.

 

Yes I defend an approach that uses my tax dollars wisely.  In this case is favors the lower cost of the highway system by purchasing cheaper land.  It's not the people it's the value of the LAND.  God you see racism everywhere don't you.  Once you see it everywhere it will be nowhere. 

 

Daily privileges!   The 50's do not exist anymore.  Do you agree that time should erase the privilege?  

 

So please give me a list of my DAILY privileges. Not from decades ago but TODAY!  

 

And to your constant accusations that I don't think racism exists?  I have two words for you.  ***** you! 

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see the actual racism seething from that woman in CA who was pulled over by a Deputy for using her cellphone while driving and caught on body cam ? THAT’S where the real racism is today. Anti white ( and anti cop) liberals. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texas Democrats Refuse to Accept Resignation of Dem Who Made Racist Slur Against Tim Scott

 

Democrats have been making very bigoted comments against Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) since he delivered the response to Joe Biden’s address to Congress. He was called an “Uncle Tom” and the left even trended “Uncle Tim” on Twitter.

 

Liberals like Joy Behar tried to lecture Scott, a black man, on what racism really is and the WaPo fact checker questioned Scott’s story about his ancestors.

 

What set them off so? Scott dared to challenge the narrative, saying that America was not a racist country. That simple fact, said with truth and conviction by a black senator, upset their apple cart.

 

Perhaps the most disgusting attack in a slew of disgusting attacks was one from a Texas Democrat, Gary O’Connor, who referred to Scott as an “Oreo” in a now-deleted Facebook post. “I had hoped that Scott might show some common sense, but it seems clear he is little more than an Oreo with no real principles,” Lamar County Democratic Party chair Gary O’Connor said.

 

O’Connor got a lot of backlash and calls for him to resign, including from Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

 

As we reported, he apologized and tendered his resignation as the chair of the Lamar County Democratic Party.

 

But now it looks like the Texas Democrats are showing exactly where they stand. They are now saying that they will not accept his resignation. They issued a statement.

 

“Gary O’Connor has led Lamar County Democrats for seven years and his life of service, collaboration, and activism for racial justice is well known throughout this community. His recent remark is incompatible with his core values,” the county party said in its statement.

“Lamar County Democrats recommit ourselves to conduct our private conversations and our public social media discussions with anti-racist, pro- reconciling attitudes and language. We strongly condemn bigotry of any kind and will continue our historic efforts to work for justice and equality for all our fellow citizens.”

 

But then they just demonstrated that they don’t give a darn about bigotry; their statement is just sham cover for their cowardly action. They’re just cool with a bigoted attack on someone daring to be “Republican While Black.” Their refusal to take action is basically an indication that they don’t take it seriously enough.

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/05/05/wow-texas-dems-refuse-to-accept-resignation-of-dem-who-made-racist-slur-against-tim-scott-n374587

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Anyone see the actual racism seething from that woman in CA who was pulled over by a Deputy for using her cellphone while driving and caught on body cam ? THAT’S where the real racism is today. Anti white ( and anti cop) liberals. 

Not only was she racist but she acted like being a teacher makes her a good person. I would bet a lot that she is a terrible teacher and her administration wants her gone based on her victimhood behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, RACISM EDITION: 

 

Campus paper Editor in Chief ‘couldn’t walk past a white person without shaking.’ 

 

This is the statement of a bigot, or a mentally ill person. Or both.

 

Or of someone who’s just putting on a performance, as is usually the case in the “literally shaking” genre. Pathetic.

 

https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=17284

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, RACISM EDITION: 

 

Campus paper Editor in Chief ‘couldn’t walk past a white person without shaking.’ 

 

This is the statement of a bigot, or a mentally ill person. Or both.

 

Or of someone who’s just putting on a performance, as is usually the case in the “literally shaking” genre. Pathetic.

 

https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=17284

If she was literally shaking when ever walking near a white person in Denver then she was shaking whenever she went out since Denver is a really white city. But more importantly she is a bigot, to hold people responsible for actions they do not take or approve of is the height of privilege and bigotry 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, RACISM EDITION: 

 

Campus paper Editor in Chief ‘couldn’t walk past a white person without shaking.’ 

 

This is the statement of a bigot, or a mentally ill person. Or both.

 

Or of someone who’s just putting on a performance, as is usually the case in the “literally shaking” genre. Pathetic.

 

https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=17284


 

Quote

Marson asserted that all trauma being experienced is historically rooted in white supremacy, adding that “Black and Brown communities are not provided the same protections by law enforcement.”


 

Funny because it took the police 12 hours to respond to our security alarm in our “whitish” community because they were too busy protecting the black and brown community. 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

There was a movie made in 1968 called “Witchfinder General” starring Vincent Price, In the United States, it was retitled “The Conqueror Worm.”

 

The film is the account of the murderous witch-hunting exploits of Matthew Hopkins (Price), a lawyer who claimed to have been appointed as a "Witch Finder General" by Parliament during the English Civil War to root out sorcery and witchcraft.

 

He got paid for every “devil-worshiper” he found.

 

Sounds like what the FBI/SPLC/MSM are trying to accomplish be hunting for “White Supremacists.”

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...