Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

  On 3/29/2021 at 7:25 PM, Chef Jim said:

 

I've asked this several times with no answer.  If we take away all the scary guns and these mass shootings still happen......then what?  

Expand  

 

Everything we already discussed, Jim - you shared some great ideas last week. I would also like to see something done with assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.  They are weapons of war that have no place in society.

 

Something has to be done at the federal level. I know gun advocates will point to Chicago to justify we do NOTHING. Well, you could argue Chicago is handicapped by neighboring states that do NOT have similar gun legislation.

 

Enough is enough.

Posted
  On 3/29/2021 at 9:57 PM, BillStime said:

 

 

Everything we already discussed, Jim - you shared some great ideas last week. I would also like to see something done with assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.  They are weapons of war that have no place in society.

 

Something has to be done at the federal level. I know gun advocates will point to Chicago to justify we do NOTHING. Well, you could argue Chicago is handicapped by neighboring states that do NOT have similar gun legislation.

 

Enough is enough.

Expand  


Weapons of WAR!!  Killers gonna kill. I suggest you stay home. Maybe with that hysterical woman whose video you shared. She looked fun 
 

I’m not the best at handling weapons but I’m pretty sure I could take out a few dozen folks at the local grocery store with my Glocks and a few ready to go clips. Take away the scary guns will do little if anything to fix this problem. It’s all between the ears of the killers. 

Posted
  On 3/31/2021 at 10:12 PM, Unforgiven said:

Forget racism. We aren't even human anymore.

The bystanders are ^%$#ing cowards.

Expand  

 

Ok in my mind this has very little to do with racism and EVERYTHING to do with our judicial system.  Why was this animal who was convicted of killing his mother ever let out on parole?  A leopard rarely changes his spots. That poor woman.  

Posted
  On 4/1/2021 at 2:56 PM, Tiberius said:

You can sue over glasses of water if you want. You have that right. But not for guns. 

Expand  

You can absolutely sue manufacturers too. 
 

Read and understand the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. 
 

But where is the precedence in which someone can sue a manufacturer for a crime someone commits with a product they manufactured? I can’t think of a one. 

Posted
  On 4/1/2021 at 3:21 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

You can absolutely sue manufacturers too. 
 

Read and understand the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. 
 

But where is the precedence in which someone can sue a manufacturer for a crime someone commits with a product they manufactured? I can’t think of a one. 

Expand  

Suing because a product is unsafe? Happens all the time 

Posted

 

 

That’s not the whole picture. The sponsors of the bill believed — not unreasonably, in the minds of many legal scholars — that an industry connected to a fundamental constitutional right deserves special protection.

 

“For example, Exxon is not allowed to endorse an electoral candidate, but The New York Times is because of the special constitutional role that the press plays,” said Adam Winkler, a constitutional lawyer and author of Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America. The gun industry, similarly, is crucial to exercising Second Amendment rights.

Posted
  On 4/1/2021 at 3:24 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

That’s not the whole picture. The sponsors of the bill believed — not unreasonably, in the minds of many legal scholars — that an industry connected to a fundamental constitutional right deserves special protection.

 

“For example, Exxon is not allowed to endorse an electoral candidate, but The New York Times is because of the special constitutional role that the press plays,” said Adam Winkler, a constitutional lawyer and author of Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America. The gun industry, similarly, is crucial to exercising Second Amendment rights.

Expand  

Plus product liability law is very complex.  For example, differentiation of circumstances of intentional misuse or accident.  Assumed and implied liability of the user and the supplier. 

 

But that's why lawyers love passing new laws.  It keeps them all busy, well compensated, and employed!   

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 4/1/2021 at 3:28 PM, All_Pro_Bills said:

Plus product liability law is very complex.  For example, differentiation of circumstances of intentional misuse or accident.  Assumed and implied liability of the user and the supplier. 

 

But that's why lawyers love passing new laws.  It keeps them all busy, well compensated, and employed!   

Expand  

Just get rid of that law. Let the people, the victims, get their day in court 

×
×
  • Create New...