Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Reed83HOF changed the title to Golladay approached Cin for a 1 yr deal
Posted

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

Do you think someone like golladay, fuller, or Samuel would want to come to Buffalo where they would be the 2nd or 3rd option though? (Diggs and Beas)

 

I think part of them wanting to take a 1 year prove it contract is them knowing they will be the clear 1 on the team with a lot of balls coming their way. Especially someone like golladay

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

Why is Golladay looking for a 1 year deal?

 

Probably to cash in once the cap goes up on a multi year deal.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
Just now, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

Because we need a role player which Sanders can do. Most of the guy's left wanting 1 year deals hoping to explode for a big year and cash in next year. Truth is Sanders or whomever we brought isn't going to beat out Diggs as our #1 a d might not beat out Beasley as our #2.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

Sanders was the leading receiver for the Saints and he fits here Golladay doesn’t 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

Do you think someone like golladay, fuller, or Samuel would want to come to Buffalo where they would be the 2nd or 3rd option though? (Diggs and Beas)

 

I think part of them wanting to take a 1 year prove it contract is them knowing they will be the clear 1 on the team with a lot of balls coming their way. Especially someone like golladay

I think the bills are preparing to set records for least rushing attempts in a season. Golladay/Fuller could come here and get 1000-1200 yards easy if they stayed healthy. 

 

The Bengals have Boyd and Higgins, and a running game, you really think he'd do better there?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.


Samuel just got 11.5 a year. I don’t think the market will be all that compressed. Sounds like there are real concerns with Golladay’s health. 
 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Sanders was the leading receiver for the Saints and he fits here Golladay doesn’t 

Golladay wouldn't fit with the Bills? That's a new one.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

“Get used to disappointment”  “Princess Bride”, couldn’t resist...

Posted
13 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Why is Golladay looking for a 1 year deal?

So he doesn't haven't to play for NYG?

 

The 1 year if high enough might be a better option compared to what NYG offered

Posted
Just now, Reed83HOF said:

So he doesn't haven't to play for NYG?

 

The 1 year if high enough might be a better option compared to what NYG offered

 

Only is there's some 2019-2020 vintage Joe Burrow on the other end 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Process said:

I think the bills are preparing to set records for least rushing attempts in a season. Golladay/Fuller could come here and get 1000-1200 yards easy if they stayed healthy. 

 

The Bengals have Boyd and Higgins, and a running game, you really think he'd do better there?

I think the part you’re missing though is he wants to prove he can be a dominant number 1 so he can cash in.

 

And he will never have that opportunity in Buffalo regardless if his stats are similar if he went to cinci.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Process said:

I think the bills are preparing to set records for least rushing attempts in a season. Golladay/Fuller could come here and get 1000-1200 yards easy if they stayed healthy. 

 

The Bengals have Boyd and Higgins, and a running game, you really think he'd do better there?

 

 

Nah.  Too many mouths to feed.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, whatdrought said:


Samuel just got 11.5 a year. I don’t think the market will be all that compressed. Sounds like there are real concerns with Golladay’s health. 
 

 

 

 

Yea this.

 

Something is wrong.  He is an elite WR

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

I love Golladay. I do understand why Beane signed Sanders though. After the AFCCG I feel Iike the coaching staff realized the playoffs have different rules and they need WRs who can get off the LOS even with contact. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Process said:

I really don't understand why we rushed to sign Sanders. I don't hate the signing. But its looking like some of these premium receivers are going to get stuck signing one year deals. 

 

If we could have had Golladay or Fuller or Samuel on a one year deal for a reasonable price, the Sanders signing is going to be very disappointing.

 

What are you looking at as a reasonable deal?

 

Samuel 3 years $34.5M so that's a "no" to "one year deal for a reasonable price"

 

I don't think Fuller or Golladay are a fit for the specific skillset the Bills were looking for (especially Fuller) but I could be wrong.

 

I also think with Fuller there 's the concern about staying healthy

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Why is Golladay looking for a 1 year deal?

because nobody is offering him the huge multi-year deal with massive up front money he's looking for.

 

How much of Sanders do we eat if he doesn't make it out of camp?

×
×
  • Create New...