jletha Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 That honestly doesnt sound like that much. If you trade for Wilson you need a QB. Assuming one of those firsts was this years, CHI picks 20 so no QB. Assuming Wilson helps out the team youre still picking in the late teens - late 20s for two more years...yay? and two starters? Who gives about two starters when it comes to trading picks. Without Wilson the Seahawks are toast. Any trade starts at 4 first rounders. 1
H2o Posted March 17, 2021 Author Posted March 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said: I dunno that id call this HAM. Seems like a reasonable enough offer, but i would think itd take one year of nearly Ricky Williams trade status, and then the two 1s after. Not saying its a good move for Chi, just itd take more. "Everything is for sale" yet doesnt mean if I walk up to anybody and offer 150% value on their home theyre going to take it either. Three 1st's, a 3rd, and two starters (albeit not named)? That's a pretty hefty offer imo. 1 1
davefan66 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 Chicago - Needs a team around Wilson to make this worth it. A team loaded for the next 3 years, or it doesn’t work. Blowing 3 first rounders is a tough swallow, at least one should pan out if they drafted them. Seattle - would need to be able to get a top QB this year. The picks in this package don’t really get you there. Can trade Russ straight up and get a few more picks and get the first or 2nd overall. Sounds like a lot. Not useful to Seattle unless they had a starting QB on the wings. Not many FA’s available other than Alex Smith?
BuffaloBill Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 24 minutes ago, Frat-Train said: 60% of the time, it works every time. I have a pain in my brain.... there is a conundrum here.... 1
Maynard Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 I guess Seattle could have used one of those firsts to snag Sammie Darnold.
BillsShredder83 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 8 minutes ago, H2o said: Three 1st's, a 3rd, and two starters (albeit not named)? That's a pretty hefty offer imo. Yeah im a moron and read right over the starters part. W/o details obviously seems like a solid offer now 🤦♂️
H2o Posted March 17, 2021 Author Posted March 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said: Yeah im a moron and read right over the starters part. W/o details obviously seems like a solid offer now 🤦♂️ My guess is one of those players was Khalil Mack and that led to the restructure of his deal after they were shot down by Seattle. 1 1
whatdrought Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 27 minutes ago, Logic said: Jordyn Brooks doesn't think that's very funny! ...but I do 😆 He and Rashad Penny can Send me an email about it. 1
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 HAM?! Sounds more like HUA. (head up a**) 1
Nihilarian Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 Word is the two teams GMs had a deal done to trade Wilson to Chicago and Hawks HC Pete Carroll nixed it. Saying I'm too old to rebuild at this point. 1
BillsShredder83 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, H2o said: My guess is one of those players was Khalil Mack and that led to the restructure of his deal after they were shot down by Seattle. I thought the same thing. His salary is too high for that to be a great trade piece imo. Great player, just crippling debt comes with 1
SCBills Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 (edited) I know Chicago is starved for a legit QB, but that's a Deshaun Watson package, not Russell Wilson. Dude starts off on fire every year lately, everybody screams "Let Russ cook!", and then he walks out of the kitchen down the stretch. Edited March 17, 2021 by SCBills 3
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 51 minutes ago, Frat-Train said: Beef on Weck gets it done. 60% of the time, it works every time. an 'Anchorman' classic! 1
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 1 minute ago, SCBills said: I know Chicago is starved for a legit QB, but that's a Deshaun Watson package, not Russell Wilson. Dude starts off on fire every year lately, everybody screams "Let Russ cook!", and then he walks out of the kitchen down the stretch. Fans: "Let Russ cook!" Russ: "Eff this. I'm calling UberEats." 3
Kwai San Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 29 minutes ago, H2o said: Hard As A Would that not be HAAM???????? Asking for a friend.
H2o Posted March 17, 2021 Author Posted March 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, Kwai San said: Would that not be HAAM???????? Asking for a friend. You gotta take that up with Jay and Kanye 1
CheshireCT Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 Well if that doesn't prove the value of hitting on a QB in the draft, what does? Thank God the team finally nailed it with Josh on the 7th. 1
97bills Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 38 minutes ago, jletha said: That honestly doesnt sound like that much. If you trade for Wilson you need a QB. Assuming one of those firsts was this years, CHI picks 20 so no QB. Assuming Wilson helps out the team youre still picking in the late teens - late 20s for two more years...yay? and two starters? Who gives about two starters when it comes to trading picks. Without Wilson the Seahawks are toast. Any trade starts at 4 first rounders. Yep It’s all about the QB us bills fans should no that more then anyone. We’ve had top 5 defense great running game and only to see 7-9 8-8 every year. If I’m a GM no thanks keeping my franchise QB
Solomon Grundy Posted March 17, 2021 Posted March 17, 2021 1 hour ago, SCBills said: I know Chicago is starved for a legit QB, but that's a Deshaun Watson package, not Russell Wilson. Dude starts off on fire every year lately, everybody screams "Let Russ cook!", and then he walks out of the kitchen down the stretch. Now add the Bills first 2 draft picks to the mix. Bills get Mack, Houston gets the house, Chicago gets Watson.👀 1
Recommended Posts