Governor Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, The Governor said: From Free Agent Frenzy on @nflnetwork: The #Eagles are taking their time with TE Zach Ertz, as they wait for higher trade compensation. Also, Ertz isn't looking for a new contract as part of a deal. Willing to play out his final year. So Edmunds alone won’t get this deal done. Not surprising. 1
Wsam4031 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 38 minutes ago, Gambit said: That has to be a joke, right? for god's sake i hope so
John from Riverside Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 35 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: No it wouldn't. Edmunds is a lousy football player. (Because he is 6'5 and has dreads makes him look cool I guess for some people) Guy can't tackle. And he has no instincts on where the play is going. Maybe he will improve this season. But building our defense around him has been a bad idea IMHO. Trade him for Ertz and plug someone else in at MLB. You are entitled to your opinion
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 44 minutes ago, The Governor said: It would likely be a trade. Edmunds for Ertz. Incorrect.
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 47 minutes ago, WMDman said: that would be a terrible trade for us. it would likely be a late round pick like a 4th Some article I read over the weekend suggested a 5th or 6th. With a cheaper contract the price may go up a bit though.
John from Riverside Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 15 minutes ago, The Governor said: So Edmunds alone won’t get this deal done. Not surprising. Who were you before you got banned prior here......your stich sounds too familiar 1 2
CorkScrewHill Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 44 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: No it wouldn't. Edmunds is a lousy football player. (Because he is 6'5 and has dreads makes him look cool I guess for some people) Guy can't tackle. And he has no instincts on where the play is going. Maybe he will improve this season. But building our defense around him has been a bad idea IMHO. Trade him for Ertz and plug someone else in at MLB. Yes .. he was voted to the Pro Bowl because he is 6'5" and has dreads. I can see you saying he doesn't deserve the pro bowl, but "lousy" is clearly a reach and if they were disenfranchised with him it is unlikely we would get less than a second rounder for him. He is considered a athletic, high ceiling LBer who has not quite arrived yet. You do not give that up for an old TE unless you are the Houston Texans. 1 1 1
Mango Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 21 minutes ago, The Governor said: From Free Agent Frenzy on @nflnetwork: The #Eagles are taking their time with TE Zach Ertz, as they wait for higher trade compensation. Also, Ertz isn't looking for a new contract as part of a deal. Willing to play out his final year. A couple of things here: -Eagles may be taking their time to deal (or not deal) Ertz for what they see as proper compensation. BUT to get the value they want, whatever team trades for him will probably want a longer term deal and help their cap situation in order to give up what Philly is looking for. -Ertz may not need an extension for a trade, but whatever team gives up picks probably does. Given the cap situation this year and Ertz contract, I can’t see Ertz moving and/or Philly getting enough value back, without an extension/restructure. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 50 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: No it wouldn't. Edmunds is a lousy football player. (Because he is 6'5 and has dreads makes him look cool I guess for some people) Guy can't tackle. And he has no instincts on where the play is going. Maybe he will improve this season. But building our defense around him has been a bad idea IMHO. Trade him for Ertz and plug someone else in at MLB. Do you think coaches and players only care about his dreads? Edmunds has made the Pro Bowl twice and 2/3 of the vote is coaches and players. The last 1/3 is the fans. 1 1
HOUSE Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Wow, Buffalo must have the busiest phone in the country with all these (cough,cough) trade discussions 1
Governor Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Do you think coaches and players only care about his dreads? Edmunds has made the Pro Bowl twice and 2/3 of the vote is coaches and players. The last 1/3 is the fans. I think that instead of benching him in week 4 next season, you trade him and save yourself the humiliation that will ensue. I truly think he could be on the move. We just paid Milano. That tells us he likely isn’t part of the future anymore. They aren’t going to pay both of them. Edited March 16, 2021 by The Governor 1 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Do you think coaches and players only care about his dreads? Edmunds has made the Pro Bowl twice and 2/3 of the vote is coaches and players. The last 1/3 is the fans. What do players and coaches know? Or well maybe It’s just a conspiracy to keep the Bills defense from being dominant by making McDermott think he is good and keep playing him.... insidious. 🤔 2
GunnerBill Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, The Governor said: I think that instead of benching him in week 4 next season, you trade him and save yourself the humiliation that will ensue. I truly think he could be on the move. The Bills are 100% all in on Tremaine Edmunds as their MLB. Not only is he not getting traded they will pick up his 5th year option. Take that to the bank. 7
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 (edited) If it said the Eagles had given him permission to negotiate with teams. Maybe I'd buy it. If it were a verified account and not a NY Giants "beat reporter" from England with a third of the followers of the Buffalo Fanatics. Maybe. Keep in mind that EVERY year, people on Twitter hypothesize moves that make sense and post fake information hoping that they get lucky and can say they "broke" the story in hopes of being legitimized as a "source". Don't fall for it. Unless it comes from a verified reporter, it's meaningless. Edited March 16, 2021 by BillsFanForever19
Paup 1995MVP Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Paup 1995MVP said: No it wouldn't. Edmunds is a lousy football player. (Because he is 6'5 and has dreads makes him look cool I guess for some people) Guy can't tackle. And he has no instincts on where the play is going. Maybe he will improve this season. But building our defense around him has been a bad idea IMHO. Trade him for Ertz and plug someone else in at MLB. The governor knows what's up. Not sure what defense the rest of you have been watching. But Edmunds CAN NOT tackle to save his life. 2
Royale with Cheese Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: The Bills are 100% all in on Tremaine Edmunds as their MLB. Not only is he not getting traded they will pick up his 5th year option. Take that to the bank. Do you think they'll extend him after the 5th year or do you think they just don't want a hole there after next year? 4 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: The governor knows what's up. Not sure what defense the rest of you have been watching. But Edmunds CAN NOT tackle to save his life. I love that you spell "cannot" as two words and then make it all uppercase for everyone to see.
GunnerBill Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said: Do you think they'll extend him after the 5th year or do you think they just don't want a hole there after next year? I think to be decided but I would lean towards them trying to extend him after next season.
NewEra Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 8 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: If it said the Eagles had given him permission to negotiate with teams. Maybe I'd buy it. If it were a verified account and not a NY Giants "beat reporter" from England with a third of the followers of the Buffalo Fanatics. Maybe. Keep in mind that EVERY year, people on Twitter hypothesize moves that make sense and post fake information hoping that they get lucky and can say they "broke" the story in hopes of being legitimized as a "source". Don't fall for it. Unless it comes from a verified reporter, it's meaningless. And it also doesn’t mean that it’s not true.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Do you think they'll extend him after the 5th year or do you think they just don't want a hole there after next year? I love that you spell "cannot" as two words and then make it all uppercase for everyone to see. Just now, GunnerBill said: I think to be decided but I would lean towards them trying to extend him after next season. agree it’s not clear. I fully expected them to move on from paying Milano to ensure they could cover Edmunds. Now it seems murkier, but I feel like they’d have to love somebody else a whole lot to move on. 1
Recommended Posts