Process Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 I really wish we would move on from Edmunds this off-season. It's time IMO. And he should have decent trade value being young and still having "potential". He is a pro bowl lb after all, lol. He is a disaster at MLB and is going to get abused by the pats. I feel like McBeane is going to be really stubborn with him though, and he's going to end up being our starting MLB for way too long. 1 1
Brennan Huff Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 55 minutes ago, inaugural balls said: Your act is soooooo tired. I mean, he’s not wrong. Covering the TE was a big problem for the defense last season. Belichick is a very smart man. 1
JGMcD2 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 12 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: Isn’t that why you have such “good” cover LBs in Milano and Edmunds?(Although the data suggests the complete opposite of Edmunds) What data suggests this? Also, I thought you didn’t trust data... weird statement to make considering that.
Success Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said: Embrace it. This pretty much guarantees the Bills won’t be complacent and this looks a lot like the Pats flailing for relevancy. Yeah, I'm trying. I keep rationalizing that every year there is a team like this (including the Bills in a few of the drought years), and it's almost never a team that ends up being a contender in the regular season. Still, it's been a crazy couple of days for that team. If I was a Pats fan, I'd be pretty stoked.
GunnerBill Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: As I've said, Jimmy G looks like the prime target for me. Yea if he is available I am sure he is the preference. But re-signing Cam makes me think they enquired and got a no.
Reed83HOF Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 14 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: Isn’t that why you have such “good” cover LBs in Milano and Edmunds?(Although the data suggests the complete opposite of Edmunds) I'm not a fan of Edmunds...3 years in and meh at best...
CommonCents Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Calm down Bill. Don’t spend all of your stimulus in one day. 1
Process Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Just now, Reed83HOF said: I'm not a fan of Edmunds...3 years in and meh at best... Meh is being generous
ndirish1978 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Feels like Bill just got his first alimony check and is out to prove to Tom that he doesn't need or miss him 1
Wayne Cubed Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 (edited) I think that Henry and Smith are nice signings for the Pats** but it all depends on who's throwing them the ball. These two TE's aren't vintage Gronk and Hernandez either. These aren't your Tom Brady New England Patriot weapons on offense. I think it makes their offense better but it only moves them from dumpster fire to respectable with their QB situation. Obviously that can change, so we shall see. EDIT: Also this highlights how bad the Pats drafting has been recently. They just used 2 3rd round picks on TEs. They used a 1st round pick on Harry. Edited March 16, 2021 by Wayne Cubed
BuffaloRebound Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 10 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: As I've said, Jimmy G looks like the prime target for me. I think San Fran would happily upgrade if they could. The SF team that went to super bowl was stacked. With above average QB play, they beat the Chiefs. New England with Jimmy G is nowhere near as good as that San Fran team was.
Governor Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: I think that Henry and Smith are nice signings for the Pats** but it all depends on who's throwing them the ball. These two TE's aren't vintage Gronk and Hernandez either. These aren't your Tom Brady New England Patriot weapons on offense. I think it makes their offense better but it only moves them from dumpster fire to respectable with their QB situation. Obviously that can change, so we shall see. Well, are they just flipping the model? Do they plan to trade their entire draft? It’s possible.
H2o Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 I told you guys. Belichick sees Brady go to Tampa and win a SB then goes completely banaynays. 1
HappyDays Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Estro said: The Pats moves to me are a clear indicator that they have their eyes on trading up for a QB in the 1st round. I dont think they're signing all of these weapons just to watch Cam Newton throw them ground-balls all season. Will it be a trade up into the 5-7 range for Fields or Trey Lance or will it be a trade up into the 9-13 range for Mac Jones? Not sure, but my gut tells me they'd prefer an athletic type so my money is on Fields or Lance. Lance and Fields won't make it out of the top 5. Pats aren't in position to draft one of the top QBs this year. If they want to draft Mac Jones, sure. He doesn't scare me though.
PatsFanNH Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, The Governor said: Well, are they just flipping the model? Do they plan to trade their entire draft? It’s possible. How much time does BB have left? Could he trade this draft and a bunch of 1sts to get a proven QB like Wilson or Watson? I think he would.
PrimeTime101 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Aussie Joe said: Oh no... Cam is going to shred us Cam did shred us on a final drive till he fumbled it.
Governor Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said: Well they definitely are stock piling in the position no Bills player or scheme can cover. Yeah, this isn’t good at all. We can’t roll with this defense. We need to be bigger and better. Our scheme is somewhat soft to begin with. They’re going to bludgeon us.
Buffalo03 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Buffalo03 said: Make the trade for Ertz. I heard Philly was asking for a 3rd or 4th round pick. Just do it Ok, since people seem to hate this, how about a 6th rounder? Is that better?
Recommended Posts