Saxum Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 29 minutes ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said: Although Brown noted that the offense and team played well without him in 2020, the wide receiver wondered out loud if Josh Allen had any say in Buffalo’s decision. Brown played a big role in Allen’s development during his time in Buffalo. Brown noted that he felt Allen deserved to have his voice heard and figured that the quarterback would want him back this season. He should be playing with Watson or Wilson as part of a package deal. Teams can save money on OC.
Beast Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 There really was no drop off when Brown was out, especially as the season went on. Cutting Brown, unfortunately, made perfect sense when it came to saving money. I liked the guy but I think I'd rather see money spent elsewhere. 3
Royale with Cheese Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 11 minutes ago, BillsVet said: I would avoid copy and pasting articles (even with a link) to make a thread. NFL players seem to be modeling their approach to personnel and other front office decisions based on where the NBA has trended. It's not going to end well, particularly when QBs demand to be traded or to have a say in who the HC or GM is. Right now I cannot imagine being a Texans or Seahawks fan and learning your star QB wants out because they're unhappy with who the GM is or thinks they need more talent to compete. EDIT: Where does this end? Do teams, especially those with big dollar QB's, allow high priced players input on player personnel decisions to satisfy them? Does the QB take added heat then if a player doesn't work out or when the cap is not managed poorly? I think this happens in every industry. I left a job 10 years ago because of our Regional Manager. I 100% knew his plan wasn't going to work and then I left. 3 years later, all offices in that division closed. I saw the writing on the wall. I'm in manufacturing right now and mills or plants that are run by bad GM/Ops Managers have high turnover because no one wants to work for them. Their bonuses are effected by the success of the plant. If the plant isn't successful, that's money out of your pocket. I don't think anyone should sacrifice their careers because they are reporting to bad management. 1
Augie Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 20 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: We should have kept Brown over Allen. You go eat your wings with ranch dip.
ganesh Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 17 minutes ago, Mango said: I am curious as to why they did not reach out to him for a pay cut. Per the above, he said he was sort of blindsided. If it was a pure salary cap move, I would assume the FO would have tried to restructure. I am not sure, but some food for thought. May be they don't want big money on a 3rd WR but instead use it to get a #1 TE....
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 Personally I don’t love the implication that Josh could’ve/should’ve spoken out on this (who’s to say whether or not Josh even knew before Brown). That’s unfair extra pressure on Josh with no upside, imho. At the end of the day no matter how good Josh is or gets to be, one has to only take a glance at Rodgers’ situation in GB to know that a FO gets to do what it wants when it wants as to the roster, franchise QB thoughts be durned. 1 3 1
Aussie Joe Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 1 minute ago, ScottLaw said: Never played for Carolina so he didn’t qualify for a pay cut..... Honestly not sure. Maybe they are targeting someone better and more reliable such as Samuel(at least I can hope/dream). Beane loves his draft picks so perhaps he is thinking of just sliding Davis into his slot. A move I wouldn’t like for a team with SB aspirations in 2021. Ot maybe he just needed some money freed up to pay Daryl Williams or a DE they are chasing? 1
DrDawkinstein Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Ot maybe he just needed some money freed up to pay Daryl Williams or a DE they are chasing? Hopefully! And good point. Brown was set to make, what, $9-10M this year? So how much of a pay cut is he really going to take? Is he willing to go down to $1M just to stay on this team? I'm sure he can get more than that somewhere else. It's what's best for both sides whether he realizes it right now or not. Good luck to him. 1
78thealltimegreat Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 13 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: What’s that got to do with him refusing to take a pay cut like you originally said? Did he offer Brandon Beane a chance to restructure? Doesn’t say in the article his agent ever reached out to him 1
HOUSE Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 32 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: We should have kept Brown over Allen. I have to disagree, Allen is younger
RyanC883 Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 45 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Reading his comments ... It appears he wasn’t asked to take a pay cut .. He says him and his agent” weren’t given a heads up” about being cut... If Beane says... take a pay cut or you will be cut... that’s a pretty big heads up... I don't know, it could have been, "we would like you to take a pay cut," and that was all that was communicated, and the Agent/Brown are now claiming this was not a "heads up."
RyanC883 Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 7 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: Hopefully! And good point. Brown was set to make, what, $9-10M this year? So how much of a pay cut is he really going to take? Is he willing to go down to $1M just to stay on this team? I'm sure he can get more than that somewhere else. It's what's best for both sides whether he realizes it right now or not. Good luck to him. I'm not sure he is getting a big payday. Rookie WR's, and a lot of FA WR's out there. Cap issues all around. Perhaps some team throws stupid money at him, but he's taking somewhat of a risk here, IMO
DrDawkinstein Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 Just now, RyanC883 said: I'm not sure he is getting a big payday. Rookie WR's, and a lot of FA WR's out there. Cap issues all around. Perhaps some team throws stupid money at him, but he's taking somewhat of a risk here, IMO I dont think he'll get a big payday. Just saying it will still be more than what the Bills want to pay him when we need all the cap room we can get. I'd be interested in hearing the minimum he'd be willing to go down to in order to stay on the team. 1
LABILLBACKER Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 48 minutes ago, H2o said: When you face situations in life you obviously question things. My take is it was a FO decision. Business is business and that's that. When you're faced with a cap that reflects a pandemic and loss of revenue this is going to happen. John answered his own question. The team's offense didn't falter without him. I'm sure he stays on a restructure if the cap was above 200. Thanks for all you did for Josh Smoke but this offseason will see crazy good players released. 1
Aussie Joe Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 6 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said: Did he offer Brandon Beane a chance to restructure? Doesn’t say in the article his agent ever reached out to him So you have gone from he wouldn’t take a pay cut , to his agent should have offered to take a pay cut before Beame cut him? is that right?
Solomon Grundy Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 10 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said: Personally I don’t love the implication that Josh could’ve/should’ve spoken out on this (who’s to say whether or not Josh even knew before Brown). That’s unfair extra pressure on Josh with no upside, imho. At the end of the day no matter how good Josh is or gets to be, one has to only take a glance at Rodgers’ situation in GB to know that a FO gets to do what it wants when it wants as to the roster, franchise QB thoughts be durned. Instead of trying to throw shade on Josh, he should of been asking himself more about his effort after returning from injury. To me, it was piss poor. If he truly wanted to be a part of team maybe he could of taken a pay cut or reworked an incentive laden contract. Personally, I think this was bush league. 2
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 47 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Reading his comments ... It appears he wasn’t asked to take a pay cut .. He says him and his agent” weren’t given a heads up” about being cut... If Beane says... take a pay cut or you will be cut... that’s a pretty big heads up... that’s my take too. the reality is I think the FO didn’t feel he was reliable enough with all the injuries. They don’t have the luxury of paying him $5M per year, and having him Miss 8 games this year.
gobillsinytown Posted March 11, 2021 Posted March 11, 2021 I feel bad for him, but this is happening all over the league. A lot of guys are being let go who want to stay with their teams. But unfortunately this is the price tag for COVID this year. I don't remember anything about him refusing to take a pay cut, but I have a hard time believing that he and his agent didn't have at least some discussion with Beane about taking one to stay with the team.
Recommended Posts