Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, DCOrange said:

https://theathletic.com/2441292/2021/03/11/bills-mock-offseason-2021-predicting-free-agent-signings-cuts-and-draft-picks/

As always with The Athletic, it's behind a paywall, but I'll list the moves here. This is what Joe B is guessing the Bills will ultimately do this offseason.

 

Cuts:

  • WR John Brown
  • IDL Quinton Jefferson
  • Edge Mario Addison
  • TE Lee Smith

Restructures:

  • OL Mitch Morse
  • LB AJ Klein

Re-Signings:

  • OL Ike Boettger - 1/$1.5M
  • OL Jon Feliciano - 3/$21M
  • QB Matt Barkley - 1/$2M
  • CB Levi Wallace - 1/$1.2M
  • S Dean Marlowe - 1/$1.5M

Leaving via Free Agency:

  • LB Matt Milano - a different article from The Athletic predicts he'll end up in Washington
  • OT Darryl Williams
  • WR Isaiah McKenzie
  • KR Andre Roberts
  • P Corey Bojorquez

Trades:

  • 2022 5th round pick for TE Zach Ertz
  • #30 pick for #40, #115, #236
  • #93 and #212 picks for #78

Signings:

  • Edge Carl Lawson - 4/$36M
  • P Michael Palardy - 1/$0.9M
  • With these signings and the people we let go, we are projected to receive a 4th round comp pick and potentially a 6th or 7th.

Draft:

  • #40: OT Dillon Radunz, North Dakota State
  • #61: WR Rondale Moore, Purdue
  • #78: LB Chazz Surratt, North Carolina
  • #115: CB Israel Mukuamu, South Carolina
  • #162: IOL Robert Jones, Middle Tennessee State
  • #178: IDL Bobby Brown III, Texas A&M
  • #235: TE Shaun Beyer, Iowa
  • #236: P James Smith, Cincinnati

 

This is awful

Posted
6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The Bills clearly have a preference for FA/vet WRs (Brown, Diggs, Beasley), and in this scenario they're not adding any experienced pieces to the unit that actually wins them games (the offense). In fact, they're subtracting. I'm increasingly interested in adding someone like Curtis Samuel, who strikes me as a perfect fit for this offense. 

From a mid to longer term perspective leaving the opportunity for draftees to fill and grow is the way to go.  Allowing Davis to move into the 3rd role goes with that.  Not overrecruiting the RBs employs the same philosophy.

 

Also in his scenario the Bills would be adding Ertz - that's a veteran option.

Posted (edited)

I don’t think you should allow one of the best punters in the game to walk out the door, especially one who can effectively kick in what is likely the worst kicking venue in the NFL. That position is just too important to take a step back on.

 

Edited by Inigo Montoya
  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

yeah but if he wants Bobby Brown, well...that's his prerogative

I saw what you did there.  

bobby-brown-my-prerogative-live.gif

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said:

From a mid to longer term perspective leaving the opportunity for draftees to fill and grow is the way to go.  Allowing Davis to move into the 3rd role goes with that.  Not overrecruiting the RBs employs the same philosophy.

 

Also in his scenario the Bills would be adding Ertz - that's a veteran option.

Ertz seems to have entered the injury phase of his career, and he doesn't increase team speed. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Not that it is a huge deal, but I don't get letting Bojo walk. In the grand scheme of things, punters and kickers are fairly cheap. They don't provide a huge amount of savings by letting them walk. He was an asset last year, just keep the kid around for a couple 100k more. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

First, thanks for posting this.

 

As for his mock offseason: it’s clearly well thought out and addressed most major need areas.

 

The two things it’s lacking, in my opinion, is substantial improvement to the interior offensive line, and a Swiss Army knife returner/gadget guy, which they’d need if they let McKenzie and Roberts go.
 

That said, you can’t address everything in one (cap strapped) offseason, and I like adding real help at EDGE and TE and getting younger at WR, CB, and LB.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Logic said:

First, thanks for posting this.

 

As for his mock offseason: it’s clearly well thought out and addressed most major need areas.

 

The two things it’s lacking, in my opinion, is substantial improvement to the interior offensive line, and a Swiss Army knife returner/gadget guy, which they’d need if they let McKenzie and Roberts go.
 

That said, you can’t address everything in one (cap strapped) offseason, and I like adding real help at EDGE and TE and getting younger at WR, CB, and LB.

 

 

I think Rondale Moore can provide the returning/gadget stuff if he pans out well/stays healthy.

 

We could have taken Kadarius Toney (or the Notre Dame OT for that matter) at #30 but as mentioned, Joe thought we'd trade down in that scenario instead.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I might be in the minority but Rondale Moore doesn't move the needle for me.  As a matter of philosophy I think its best to stay away from 175 lb athletes in the NFL.  

I just don't see it with him. Tavon Austin, was a more electric athlete, IMO & I jisy dont think players that size translate in the pros

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The Bills clearly have a preference for FA/vet WRs (Brown, Diggs, Beasley), and in this scenario they're not adding any experienced pieces to the unit that actually wins them games (the offense). In fact, they're subtracting. I'm increasingly interested in adding someone like Curtis Samuel, who strikes me as a perfect fit for this offense. 

They need make the offense better. I like a Brown, Roberts and McKenzie swap for Samuel a lot. Give me him and an Edge in FA.

 

Sal C and Jeremey from WGR seem to think we love Bates, so I could see us playing him at RT. 

 

Edit: this is the same reasoning why I like Reddick, plays coverage LB and lines up to pass rush in those situations. You pay more per year for one player, but he fills 2 spots for the same cost of 2 average meh type players. 

Edited by Reed83HOF
Posted
1 hour ago, Mango said:

Not that it is a huge deal, but I don't get letting Bojo walk. In the grand scheme of things, punters and kickers are fairly cheap. They don't provide a huge amount of savings by letting them walk. He was an asset last year, just keep the kid around for a couple 100k more. 

 

Giving Bojo just the minimum RFA tender of $2.133M puts him at 12th in the NFL.  Meanwhile they could sign a guy like Palardy for $750K.

Posted

I often see in these mock offseasons that trade back that gets them that 4th round pick...

 

It’s convenient but who is the other team trading up to take at pick 30?

Posted

 

1 hour ago, Aussie Joe said:

I often see in these mock offseasons that trade back that gets them that 4th round pick...

 

It’s convenient but who is the other team trading up to take at pick 30?

I believe it's the Broncos. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said:

I like Spencer Brown (Northern Iowa) more than Radunz. He can be had later in Rd 2. Gotta get an impact player with 1st pick

 

Agree on Spencer Brown. I also think Jaylen Mayfield is a solid option at RT.

Posted

Letting Daryl Williams walk is foolish also letting Bojo walk is foolish. The rest is solid but I would rather have D.Williams, Bojo, a mid-level signing at guard and some more depth as opposed to Mongo at 7 million and Lawson at 9 million 

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Bleedbuffaloblue said:

Don’t see them going WR with their second pick.

 

It depends who is on the board. In Buscaglia's mock, he has them taking Rondale Moore in the 2nd Round. He's absolutely worth consideration there and would add an element to the WR corps that is currently missing, especially with Brown gone.

 

5 hours ago, MiltonWaddams said:

Roberts or McKittrick....gotta keep one. In this scenario, who does he foresee returning kicks? Micah Hyde is not going to be back there and at such a risk.

 

If you're going by his mock, Moore has the capability to be the returner and a good one at that. His biggest question mark is his durability. He's small but, if he stays healthy, he's an electric 'do all' weapon that would give Daboll a lot of flexibility. He can be the 'gadget guy'. 

Edited by ExWNYer
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...