Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted


 

It’s almost comical the way the liberal media at large falls back on two narratives when confronting stories that hurt Democrats: 

 

1. “This isn’t a story,” “nothing we didn’t know.” 

 

2. Attack the messenger. 

 

It happened the first time around with the Hunter Biden laptop story. When The Post published stories about Hunter introducing partners and foreign agents to then-Vice President Joe, who swore up and down he “never discussed” business with his son, they either insulted us, claimed falsely it was “Russian disinformation” or bought the campaign line that these stories were “long discredited.” 
 

Now it’s happening again, after internal Twitter documents were revealed through reporter Matt Taibbi. In almost lockstep, journalists are bashing Taibbi, who has a long history of campaigning journalism and colorful prose. He’s the man who called Goldman Sachs “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.” The typical comment came from Ben Collins, who tweeted, “Imagine throwing it all away to do PR work for the richest person in the world. Humiliating s–t.” Which is rich considering NBC has a reputation of taking whatever the bureaucrats of the Justice Department or FBI tell them and printing it without question. Rather than focus on the relevant questions — are the documents on the laptop authentic (2020), are the Twitter messages real (2022) — reporters resort to ad hominem dismissals. 

 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/liberal-dose-of-denial-to-guard-dems/

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, B-Man said:

It’s almost comical the way the liberal media at large falls back on two narratives when confronting stories that hurt Democrats: 

 

1. “This isn’t a story,” “nothing we didn’t know.” 

 

2. Attack the messenger. 

 

It happened the first time around with the Hunter Biden laptop story. When The Post published stories about Hunter introducing partners and foreign agents to then-Vice President Joe, who swore up and down he “never discussed” business with his son, they either insulted us, claimed falsely it was “Russian disinformation” or bought the campaign line that these stories were “long discredited.” 
 

Now it’s happening again, after internal Twitter documents were revealed through reporter Matt Taibbi. In almost lockstep, journalists are bashing Taibbi, who has a long history of campaigning journalism and colorful prose. He’s the man who called Goldman Sachs “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.” The typical comment came from Ben Collins, who tweeted, “Imagine throwing it all away to do PR work for the richest person in the world. Humiliating s–t.” Which is rich considering NBC has a reputation of taking whatever the bureaucrats of the Justice Department or FBI tell them and printing it without question. Rather than focus on the relevant questions — are the documents on the laptop authentic (2020), are the Twitter messages real (2022) — reporters resort to ad hominem dismissals. 

 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/liberal-dose-of-denial-to-guard-dems/

 

The reason why you can't trust anything anyone says anymore.  

Posted
8 hours ago, B-Man said:


 

It’s almost comical the way the liberal media at large falls back on two narratives when confronting stories that hurt Democrats: 

 

1. “This isn’t a story,” “nothing we didn’t know.” 

 

2. Attack the messenger. 

 

It happened the first time around with the Hunter Biden laptop story. When The Post published stories about Hunter introducing partners and foreign agents to then-Vice President Joe, who swore up and down he “never discussed” business with his son, they either insulted us, claimed falsely it was “Russian disinformation” or bought the campaign line that these stories were “long discredited.” 
 

Now it’s happening again, after internal Twitter documents were revealed through reporter Matt Taibbi. In almost lockstep, journalists are bashing Taibbi, who has a long history of campaigning journalism and colorful prose. He’s the man who called Goldman Sachs “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.” The typical comment came from Ben Collins, who tweeted, “Imagine throwing it all away to do PR work for the richest person in the world. Humiliating s–t.” Which is rich considering NBC has a reputation of taking whatever the bureaucrats of the Justice Department or FBI tell them and printing it without question. Rather than focus on the relevant questions — are the documents on the laptop authentic (2020), are the Twitter messages real (2022) — reporters resort to ad hominem dismissals. 

 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/liberal-dose-of-denial-to-guard-dems/

This is straight out of the Clinton playbook. Hilary was/is a master of the ‘we’ve been over this already’ deflection strategy. Don’t apologize for the issue, and don’t defend your actions, just tell anyone who asks that this has already been discussed….and then just sit there. It’s brilliant, actually.

Posted
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

This is straight out of the Clinton playbook. Hilary was/is a master of the ‘we’ve been over this already’ deflection strategy. Don’t apologize for the issue, and don’t defend your actions, just tell anyone who asks that this has already been discussed….and then just sit there. It’s brilliant, actually.


i see this work effectively in politically charged work environments as well.  Someone brings up a bunch of concerns about a direction that was taken and it’s followed by a “we discussed this in the blah blah committee meeting” 

 

Said authoritatively enough it completely dismissed the concerns.  

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


i see this work effectively in politically charged work environments as well.  Someone brings up a bunch of concerns about a direction that was taken and it’s followed by a “we discussed this in the blah blah committee meeting” 

 

Said authoritatively enough it completely dismissed the concerns.  

Professionally its defined as being a bull sheet artist.  Counter that argument by requesting details.  Names, dates, and places.  Documentation, meeting minutes, action items and issues.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted


 

The Great Meltdown Is Just Beginning

 

Townhall, by Kevin McCullough

 

 

The vindication for President Donald Trump on a number of fronts is just beginning. The malign actors know it and they are angry with rage at the prospect of what it means.

 

Losing control of the people’s House last month was bad enough. Now they have this “Twitter thing” that is not within their authoritarian control. They don’t have the free hand to tip the scale in their favor. They don’t have the ability to gaslight the nation with dishonest narrative about their political enemies. They see glimpses of the future if things proceed as they currently are—and they are very afraid. They should be.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2022/12/04/the-great-meltdown-is-just-beginning-n2616707

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Professionally its defined as being a bull sheet artist.  Counter that argument by requesting details.  Names, dates, and places.  Documentation, meeting minutes, action items and issues.


Unfortunately, that only works up to a certain level in the organization. At some point in the career journey you hit a level where it’s a political liability to be too focused on facts. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


i see this work effectively in politically charged work environments as well.  Someone brings up a bunch of concerns about a direction that was taken and it’s followed by a “we discussed this in the blah blah committee meeting” 

 

Said authoritatively enough it completely dismissed the concerns.  

 

Completely unrelated but the worst thing is "This is a great idea.  I'll bring it up in the next _________ committee meeting!"  

 

Ummmm....no you won't and if you do I know for sure I'm not getting credit for it.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Completely unrelated but the worst thing is "This is a great idea.  I'll bring it up in the next _________ committee meeting!"  

 

Ummmm....no you won't and if you do I know for sure I'm not getting credit for it.  


 

see there’s another one for which I offer a  hack..  

 

1) don’t ever worry about credit 

2) figure out who the smartest idea person 

3) convince that person of your idea and have them bring it up.

 

you might get credit, you might not, but if it’s a thing that should happen- this is the best way to make it happen 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


kind of like when he asserted the science said vaxing would prevent spread….  Which turned out never to have been studied or proven and beyond just being a lie, may also have been incorrect? 

 

 

 

Shhhhhh.

 

Are you trying to get him killed ?

 

😆

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Shhhhhh.

 

Are you trying to get him killed ?

 

😆


you know I considered funneling a bunch of money to a poorly managed Chinese pathogen lab with s dismal safety record to modify bat viruses into infecting human cells, a virus that would be particularly harmful to the elderly folks like dr F,  because it might lead to some cool research papers- But it seemed like it might backfire so… meh

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Why even bother voting in PA now? The results are already pre-determined.

 

 

Like it makes a difference with those half-wits.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...