BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 Just now, B-Man said: No. But a riot that occurs trying to delay a vote...........................That aint an Insurrection/\. (unless you are desperate as the Left) Why did they want to delay the vote? What would that do?
B-Man Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: What was the purpose of storming the United States Capitol? You are really bad at this. You demand answers constantly and never even read most of the response. LOL...............
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: So the definition of insurrection includes the word armed? Armed-at-some-point (i.e. an initially unarmed group could overwhelm authority, take their arms and using them against them), yes.
B-Man Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: Why did they want to delay the vote? What would that do? Such desperation. Asking the same questions over and over................it's page #78 little boy. Try and ask yourself some of the questions that other posters have posed to you.........................and you ignored.
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Such desperation. Asking the same questions over and over................it's page #78 little boy. Try and ask yourself some of the questions that other posters have posed to you.........................and you ignored. No Bonnie - answer the question and stop dancing around it - why did they want to slow the vote?
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 And I'll respond the same as always: "ask them." Without weapons, they had no chance of doing anything significant.
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Doc said: Armed-at-some-point (i.e. an initially unarmed group could overwhelm authority, take their arms and using them against them), yes. I just looked at the definition of insurrection at three different sources - no where in the definition is the word armed. Besides what we have seen on Fox and other notable sources touting ARMED - can you please clarify your sources? Edited July 9, 2021 by BillStime
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: I just looked at the definition of insurrection at three different sources - no where in the definition is the word armed. Besides what we have seen on Fox and other notable sources touting ARMED - can you please clarify your sources? Ask Joey.
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 Just now, Doc said: Ask Joey. Nope - you’re the one trying to sell this bs - own it
B-Man Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 14 minutes ago, BillStime said: No Bonnie - answer the question and stop dancing around it - why did they want to slow the vote? No. That has been discussed. You have not answered a question yet. and you childishly keep demanding it of others. 😂
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, BillStime said: Nope - you’re the one trying to sell this bs - own it OK, we'll remove "armed." Therefore all the riots last year (which were more armed than 1/6) were "insurrections." You win! 1
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: No. That has been discussed. You have not answered a question yet. and you childishly keep demanding it of others. 😂 Copy and paste something from this thread that highlights what was to come next after delaying the vote. We will wait. And Bonnie - you look absolutely pathetic dodging all these questions. It is hilarious actually… And which question have I hid from?
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, Doc said: OK, we'll remove "armed." Therefore all the riots last year (which were more armed than 1/6) were "insurrections." You win! You couldn’t help yourself Doc. In less than two hours - you are once again trying to justify the 1/6 insurrection with last years riots. Hysterical
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 16 hours ago, BillStime said: Sorry, I don't feel cornered whatsoever... but you said "I'm a registered Democrat but they lost me over a decade ago when everything started morphing into the current extremest ideology" - I just assumed you joined the cult given your history of comments here on this thread, defending Trump, attacking CRT, downplaying 1/6 and promoting the Big Lie, etc etc etc. Well I don't think being objective about Trump, acknowledging the good and the bad, and calling it like it is should be viewed as me being some proponent of the guy. He's a detestable person but he's one of the few high-profile leaders that stands up against the establishment embedded inside Washington. Who do you propose I support? The current grifters and hustlers in the White House? Am aged President that obviously is not physically or mentally capable of executing the duties of the office? The Russian connection is a joke. Nobody, absolutely nobody, has ever, ever produced on single shred of evidence to prove any connection or association, Yet the fools continue to sell this nonsense. Are they just stupid? Or liars? They see some imaginary association with circumstances or events and use conjecture to draw some baseless conclusion of coordination or conspiracy. So who's peddling conspiracy theories here? Meanwhile, they ignore the China threat while they steal everything that isn't bolted down, bring it home, copy or improve it, with the intent of using it against us. Along with tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Twitter doing the bidding of Xi. Maybe that's a story CNN and MSNBC should cover 24/7? Either these people are helping or ignoring it but either way they need to step aside and let somebody that knows what's going on take charge. As for attacking CRT you may view my comments as attack and I see them as an honest critique of something based on illogical conclusions and misrepresentations of historical events. Its the subjective opinion of the authors. Nothing more, nothing less. But its being peddled as some kind of sound and thoroughly researched theory. I'm willing to listen if you could tell me what about it you find genuinely useful and objective? I don't see what I say as "downplaying" 1/6. I see what others are saying as over-playing it. What are the facts so far? Nobody has been charged with insurrection but that's what it continues to be called in the media. Suspects are being detained without bail in confinement for minor charges while suspects arrested for serious crimes of violence are released without bail in major cities across the US. These people are more like "political prisoners" than criminals. Its been 6 months and the government has yet to bring anything to trial. And the committee to investigate? Its a political farce. As far as election irregularities the jury is still out as audits and investigation continues in several states. And people that insist nothing is there to be found insist on trying to stop others from looking. But so far motions to stop a lot of these activities have failed. That doesn't raise any suspicions for you?
Ted Striker Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 20 hours ago, ALF said: Ms. Babbitt, who was transported to Washington Hospital A hospital! What is it? 1
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 9 hours ago, BillStime said: You couldn’t help yourself Doc. In less than two hours - you are once again trying to justify the 1/6 insurrection with last years riots. Hysterical LOL! Looks like you'll need to look up another word. The word you're searching for is "equate." Because the riots last year fit the definition of "insurrection" if that's what you want to call 1/6.
BillStime Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Well I don't think being objective about Trump, acknowledging the good and the bad, and calling it like it is should be viewed as me being some proponent of the guy. He's a detestable person but he's one of the few high-profile leaders that stands up against the establishment embedded inside Washington. Who do you propose I support? The current grifters and hustlers in the White House? Am aged President that obviously is not physically or mentally capable of executing the duties of the office? The Russian connection is a joke. Nobody, absolutely nobody, has ever, ever produced on single shred of evidence to prove any connection or association, Yet the fools continue to sell this nonsense. Are they just stupid? Or liars? They see some imaginary association with circumstances or events and use conjecture to draw some baseless conclusion of coordination or conspiracy. So who's peddling conspiracy theories here? Meanwhile, they ignore the China threat while they steal everything that isn't bolted down, bring it home, copy or improve it, with the intent of using it against us. Along with tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Twitter doing the bidding of Xi. Maybe that's a story CNN and MSNBC should cover 24/7? Either these people are helping or ignoring it but either way they need to step aside and let somebody that knows what's going on take charge. As for attacking CRT you may view my comments as attack and I see them as an honest critique of something based on illogical conclusions and misrepresentations of historical events. Its the subjective opinion of the authors. Nothing more, nothing less. But its being peddled as some kind of sound and thoroughly researched theory. I'm willing to listen if you could tell me what about it you find genuinely useful and objective? I don't see what I say as "downplaying" 1/6. I see what others are saying as over-playing it. What are the facts so far? Nobody has been charged with insurrection but that's what it continues to be called in the media. Suspects are being detained without bail in confinement for minor charges while suspects arrested for serious crimes of violence are released without bail in major cities across the US. These people are more like "political prisoners" than criminals. Its been 6 months and the government has yet to bring anything to trial. And the committee to investigate? Its a political farce. As far as election irregularities the jury is still out as audits and investigation continues in several states. And people that insist nothing is there to be found insist on trying to stop others from looking. But so far motions to stop a lot of these activities have failed. That doesn't raise any suspicions for you? I could barely read this without laughing my assss off at you…. 1 hour ago, Doc said: LOL! Looks like you'll need to look up another word. The word you're searching for is "equate." Because the riots last year fit the definition of "insurrection" if that's what you want to call 1/6. You still can’t help yourself…
Doc Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: You still can’t help yourself… LOL! Yeah, I'm the one...
Chef Jim Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 11 hours ago, BillStime said: You couldn’t help yourself Doc. In less than two hours - you are once again trying to justify the 1/6 insurrection with last years riots. Hysterical He is?? You’re not very perceptive are you. 2 hours ago, Ted Striker said: A hospital! What is it? Hows the drinking problem Ted?
Unforgiven Posted July 9, 2021 Posted July 9, 2021 "mistakes made intentional or otherwise" National guard offered two days before to capital police and Muriel Bowser, they turned us down So, by left think, Muriel Bowser caused the riot. 1
Recommended Posts