Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, BillStime said:


You can downplay what happened all you want. It won’t change the fact that you and your party is associated with one of the greatest stains in American history.

 

Quite the Trump legacy.

And you and your party is associated with the KKK and slavery? A bigger stain in American history

 

You see how it works if you play the game like that? 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

You can downplay what happened all you want. It won’t change the fact that you and your party is associated with one of the greatest stains in American history.

 

Quite the Trump legacy.

 

Yeah because the riots last year looked real great, to the world, for your party...

 

Oh and not my party. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah because the riots last year looked real great, to the world, for your party...

 

Oh and not my party. 


You’re right - the world watched… in horror.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9efeb6652b45259f73beea5dc373299c.jpeg

Posted
Just now, BillStime said:


You’re right - the world watched… in horror.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9efeb6652b45259f73beea5dc373299c.jpeg

 

That still doesn't give the right to burn down a city. Destroy people's businesses and homes and livelihoods

 

I bet George Floyd would agree

 

If you think burning down a city is justice, then you're really corrupted

 

Violence begets more violence, always has and always will

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

You’re right - the world watched… in horror.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9efeb6652b45259f73beea5dc373299c.jpeg

 

Yeah and again, he got arrested just days after the incident but the riots lasted for half a year afterwards.  And ultimately he got what he deserved.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah and again, he got arrested just days after the incident but the riots lasted for half a year afterwards.  And ultimately he got what he deserved.


How are the two events related?

Posted
6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

How are the two events related?

 

You tell me.  After Chauvin was arrested, there was no justification for the rioting.  Peaceful protesting is/was fine.

  • Agree 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You tell me.  After Chauvin was arrested, there was no justification for the rioting.  Peaceful protesting is/was fine.


But you freaks keep trying to justify 1/6 w what happened last year.

 

Explain

Posted
Just now, BillStime said:

But you freaks keep trying to justify 1/6 w what happened last year.

 

Explain

 

We do?  Where?  Point out one instance.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

EVERYWHERE - hell you brought it up just 43 minutes ago… 

 

Yeah, OK.  That's real "justification."

 

:rolleyes:

Posted
20 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah, OK.  That's real "justification."

 

:rolleyes:

 

 

You don't understand Doc.

 

Pointing out the Left's infatuation and false narrative of the Capitol RIOT is considered "trying to Justify" in BillZtime-Land

 

 

:D

Posted
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

You don't understand Doc.

 

Pointing out the Left's infatuation and false narrative of the Capitol RIOT is considered "trying to Justify" in BillZtime-Land

 

 

:D

 

Apparently.  Even if you've only ever called those who entered the Capitol "idiots" or something similar. :rolleyes:

Posted
8 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

You don't understand Doc.

 

Pointing out the Left's infatuation and false narrative of the Capitol RIOT is considered "trying to Justify" in BillZtime-Land

 

 

:D


What false narrative? Please articulate it in your own words.

Posted
9 minutes ago, BillStime said:

What false narrative? Please articulate it in your own words.

 

I already said it many times.  But again, it wasn't "armed."  Therefore it couldn't possible be an "insurrection."  Unless we start calling any "violent uprising against an authority or government" an "insurrection."

Posted
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

I already said it many times.  But again, it wasn't "armed."  Therefore it couldn't possible be an "insurrection."  Unless we start calling any "violent uprising against an authority or government" an "insurrection."


So the definition of insurrection includes the word armed?

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, BillStime said:


What false narrative? Please articulate it in your own words.

 

 

Only need one word.

 

 

"Insurrection"

 

 

That is a false narrative.

 

 As you and the rest of the self-congratulatory peanut gallery are aware.

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Only need one word.

 

 

"Insurrection"

 

 

That is a false narrative.

 

 As you and the rest of the self-congratulatory peanut gallery are aware.

 

 

 

 


What was the purpose of storming the United States Capitol? 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BillStime said:


So the definition of insurrection includes the word armed?

 

 

 

No.

 

But a riot that occurs trying to delay a vote...........................That aint an Insurrection/\.

 

 

(unless you are desperate as the Left)

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...