The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection

[SoCal Deek]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Buffoonery Abounds as Adam Schiff Accidentally Proves GOP Right About Focus of Capitol Riots Committee

 

 

 

While the Democrat argument is that Republicans are supposedly afraid of the truth, the GOP’s argument is that it is unnecessary to add a “commission” on top of the DOJ investigation as well as the other numerous inevitable Democrat-run committee “investigations” into the attack, which they feel will ultimately be little more than show trials designed not only for Democrats to obfuscate the matter even more so than they’ve already done but also to keep the issue and Trump’s name out there going into the 2022 midterms.

 

And now, as the House Speaker Pelosi-appointed partisan Capitol riots committee gets to doing their thing, one of its most prominent members has revealed where the areas of focus will be – and in the process proved Republicans were right to reject the idea all along:

 

[Rep. Adam] Schiff told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace that it will examine whether Trump and the White House had “advance notice” that the more organized groups had concertedly planned the violent attack for the express purpose of overturning Trump’s loss.

 

Schiff also said the investigation would inevitably look at the role that some Republicans in Congress might have played in promoting the “Stop the Steal” rally, which led directly to the violence. The probe, Schiff said, might lead to “some of our colleagues.”

 

Schiff also noted that the committee would seek testimony from police officers who came under violent assault, to illustrate that the attack was an outgrowth of an ongoing “domestic terrorism threat.”

 

Laughably, the same guy who who knowingly perpetuated the lie about Trump/Russia collusion for the entire four years of Trump’s presidency attempted to assure Wallace during the same interview that Democrats would make every effort to prove to the American people that they were only interested in getting to the bottom of what happened on January 6th:

 

 

Schiff has to be the very picture of the very worst of elected officials. He’s a total hack! He should refocus his time on making his home district something other than a sewer of homeless squalor. 

[TH3]

7 hours ago, B-Man said:

Jan 6 Truthers are another breed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who the eff is Molly and why should I care what she says?

[ALF]

Trump claimed Ashli Babbitt was shot in the head , she was shot in the shoulder a non lethal area. Reports were Congress was still evacuating from that chamber resulting in their protection. 

[SoCal Deek]

10 hours ago, ALF said:

Trump claimed Ashli Babbitt was shot in the head , she was shot in the shoulder a non lethal area. Reports were Congress was still evacuating from that chamber resulting in their protection. 

You have got to be kidding me. So now it’s OK for cops to shoot unarmed people as long as it’s nonlethal, and except when they die? Yikes! Tie yourself in knots much? 

[Governor]

17 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You have got to be kidding me. So now it’s OK for cops to shoot unarmed people as long as it’s nonlethal, and except when they die? Yikes! Tie yourself in knots much? 

Wasn’t that Pence’s secret service that shot her? 

[All_Pro_Bills]

16 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Buffoonery Abounds as Adam Schiff Accidentally Proves GOP Right About Focus of Capitol Riots Committee

 

 

 

While the Democrat argument is that Republicans are supposedly afraid of the truth, the GOP’s argument is that it is unnecessary to add a “commission” on top of the DOJ investigation as well as the other numerous inevitable Democrat-run committee “investigations” into the attack, which they feel will ultimately be little more than show trials designed not only for Democrats to obfuscate the matter even more so than they’ve already done but also to keep the issue and Trump’s name out there going into the 2022 midterms.

 

And now, as the House Speaker Pelosi-appointed partisan Capitol riots committee gets to doing their thing, one of its most prominent members has revealed where the areas of focus will be – and in the process proved Republicans were right to reject the idea all along:

 

[Rep. Adam] Schiff told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace that it will examine whether Trump and the White House had “advance notice” that the more organized groups had concertedly planned the violent attack for the express purpose of overturning Trump’s loss.

 

Schiff also said the investigation would inevitably look at the role that some Republicans in Congress might have played in promoting the “Stop the Steal” rally, which led directly to the violence. The probe, Schiff said, might lead to “some of our colleagues.”

 

Schiff also noted that the committee would seek testimony from police officers who came under violent assault, to illustrate that the attack was an outgrowth of an ongoing “domestic terrorism threat.”

 

Laughably, the same guy who who knowingly perpetuated the lie about Trump/Russia collusion for the entire four years of Trump’s presidency attempted to assure Wallace during the same interview that Democrats would make every effort to prove to the American people that they were only interested in getting to the bottom of what happened on January 6th:

 

 

The thing is the government has accumulated a lot of evidence including thousands of hours of video and has so far refused to release or share any of it with the public.  So unless you or I were there to witness the events almost every conclusion or belief any of us hold about the Capitol on 1/6 is speculation.  We still don't know the identity of the officer or the probable cause for the shooting of Ashli Babbitt like its some kind of State secret.  Now the "big" find is Lego Capitol kits.   What's next?  White House Barbie playhouse?  Is this supposed to "prove" conspiracy?  Wow.  

 

And currently most suspects have been detained without bail held in confinement for simple charges like trespassing.  And how can it be an insurrection without anyone actually being charged for insurrection?  The words used more as a marketing slogan than a real criminal act.

 

So to the Fed's.  Tell us what you know.  What are you afraid of?  Even the most loyal supporters of big oppressive government and corporate media propaganda outlets must have a sense they're holding back here.  Because its most likely the actual evidence of the day's events doesn't support either the pre-meditated planning scenarios or involvement with the previous administration.  If it did you can be damn sure it would have been already leaked and plastered all over CNN and MSNBC 24/7. 

 

Here's what I think.  The governments plan is to hold everybody in jail for forever waiting for various legal procedures to coerce the suspects to agree to reduced charges in exchange for guilty pleas and "statements" implicating specific officials even if they have to lie to get out of jail.  The Fed's don't care if the suspects make stuff up as long as they make up and say the stuff the government wants them to say. 

As for public communication the governments using the "Mushroom" approach.  Keep us in the dark and feed us bull crap.  Like it or not I'd argue my theory is as good a theory as anyone else's given we're not being told anything.   

[Tiberius]

17 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Here is how serious the democrats are about this 'commission'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Omg, he objected? Ya, that makes him just like those who tried to violently overturn the election. 

 

 

[Irv]

21 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Omg, he objected? Ya, that makes him just like those who tried to violently overturn the election. 

 

 

 

You honestly think those bozos who broke into the Capitol could overturn the election?  How?  What a mess.

[All_Pro_Bills]

3 minutes ago, Irv said:

 

You honestly think those bozos who broke into the Capitol could overturn the election?  How?  What a mess.

Correct.  The idea some disorganized band of rioters without any capacity to hold or occupy or overthrow the government, with no logistical support from anywhere else, is frankly comical.  Anyone that believes or pursues that narrative is at best a fool.

Look how much trouble armed and violent rioters and anarchist had in attempting attacks on Federal facilities.  Antifa forces sent wave after wave of their forces against the Federal Court House in Portland night after night and still couldn't take or destroy the facility. 

But the left wing fascists don't want to remember or compare any of that do they?  Their game now is to play up the Capitol event and exploit it to the max.  In order to use it as pretext for oppressing their political opposition through the passage of new "laws" criminalizing political descent.  That's the objective and end game here.  Gain more power and control.  Law and order?  They don't care about that as demonstrated by the number of nightly shootings and murders across the country.  The fact everyone knows that's the goal and they still won't admit it demonstrates a high level of dishonesty.      

[B-Man]

 

 

Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

16 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Correct.  The idea some disorganized band of rioters without any capacity to hold or occupy or overthrow the government, with no logistical support from anywhere else, is frankly comical.  Anyone that believes or pursues that narrative is at best a fool.

Look how much trouble armed and violent rioters and anarchist had in attempting attacks on Federal facilities.  Antifa forces sent wave after wave of their forces against the Federal Court House in Portland night after night and still couldn't take or destroy the facility. 

But the left wing fascists don't want to remember or compare any of that do they?  Their game now is to play up the Capitol event and exploit it to the max.  In order to use it as pretext for oppressing their political opposition through the passage of new "laws" criminalizing political descent.  That's the objective and end game here.  Gain more power and control.  Law and order?  They don't care about that as demonstrated by the number of nightly shootings and murders across the country.  The fact everyone knows that's the goal and they still won't admit it demonstrates a high level of dishonesty.      

[All_Pro_Bills]

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

The liberal plot is to meld the oppressive powers of the State with big corporate entities.  You look at Google, Facebook, Twitter.  They are simply extensions of the intelligence gathering capabilities of the State.  That's their primary function.  They do it for our government, they do it for China too.  Textbook definition of fascism. 

Genuine liberals distrust government and hate big corporations.  These clowns are not liberals.   

 

But nice of you post some another dumb slogan and avoid commenting on anything I stated.

[BillStime]

3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The liberal plot is to meld the oppressive powers of the State with big corporate entities.  You look at Google, Facebook, Twitter.  They are simply extensions of the intelligence gathering capabilities of the State.  That's their primary function.  They do it for our government, they do it for China too.  Textbook definition of fascism. 

Genuine liberals distrust government and hate big corporations.  These clowns are not liberals.   

 

But nice of you post some another dumb slogan and avoid commenting on anything I stated.

Now do an honest assessment of your party and media sources - highlight how they are manipulating ignorant people with fake news - designed to forever keep us divided.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Jan 6 Truthers are another breed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

On 4/18/2021 at 7:03 PM, B-Man said:

 

By the way, the identity of the Capitol policeman IS known. I have seen his name and his pictures at multiple sites. But since the Media will not show it I won't either.

 

But it will come out eventually.

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT TIME: RealClearInvestigations: Naming the Capitol Police Officer Who Killed Unarmed Jan. 6 Rioter Ashli Babbitt.

 

For the past six months, as Congress has proposed legislation to reform police departments across the country, the Capitol Police has stiff-armed government watchdogs, journalists and even lawyers for Babbitt, who have sought the identity of the officer and additional details about the shooting. The USCP still refuses to release his name, in stark contrast to recent high-profile police shootings around the nation.

 

In February, USCP issued a press release promising to “share additional information once the investigation is complete.” But Justice Department investigators closed their probe in April, clearing the officer of criminal wrongdoing in Babbitt’s death, which the medical examiner ruled a homicide. And last month, the D.C. Police — which shares jurisdiction with the Capitol Police and has led the investigation into Babbitt’s shooting — concluded its own internal review of the shooting without making any findings, according to spokeswoman Kristen Metzger.Still, USCP continues “stonewalling the public,” according to the head of the police union. . . .

 

Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio — Lt. Michael L. Byrd — and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won’t confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn’t denying it.

 

In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing. Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts — which, according to its website, provides “the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken” — recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as “Officer Byrd.” His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (at around 39:20).

 

Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.

 

In addition, Byrd’s resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting — a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.

 

Following the shooting, Byrd’s Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.

 

 

 

 

Plus:

In February 2019, Lt. Byrd was investigated for leaving his department-issued Glock-22 firearm unattended in a restroom on the House side of the Capitol, even though the potent weapon, which fires .40-caliber rounds, has no manual safety to prevent unintended firing. Fortunately, the abandoned gun was discovered by another officer during a routine security sweep. A Glock-22 was used in the Babbitt shooting.

 

Byrd addressed the blunder at a roll call the following morning, reportedly telling fellow officers that he would “be treated differently” because of his rank as a lieutenant.

 

 

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/07/07/naming_the_capitol_cop_who_killed_jan_6_rioter_ashli_babbitt_779601.html

 

 

Stay tuned. The January 6 “Lego Insurrection” story seems to be unraveling.

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

 

Bonnie's new phrase of the day is:

Jan 6 Truthers

 

 

 

[716er]

No surprise BMan supports outing the officer who killed the terrorist 

[B-Man]

9 minutes ago, 716er said:

No surprise BMan supports outing the officer who killed the terrorist 

 

No surprise, 716'er supports suppressing the name of the police officer who shot an unarmed woman.

 

[BillStime]

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

No surprise, 716'er supports suppressing the name of the police officer who shot an unarmed woman.

 

 

Where was she when she was shot? Did she comply? Who told her to be there?

CC: @B-Man - you are being used.

 

Anything to distract what really happened that day...

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

Now do an honest assessment of your party and media sources - highlight how they are manipulating ignorant people with fake news - designed to forever keep us divided.

First off its not my party.  I'm a registered Democrat but they lost me over a decade ago when everything started  morphing into the current extremest ideology.  So please stop trying to slot me me into some preconceived category.  You might want to consider the likelihood that you are the one that needs to assess fake news and getting gaslighted by the likes of CNN and MSNBC.  As time goes on you might notice every narrative they've preached has proven false as more information gets out there. 

As I've stated a few times I am perplexed why people that consider themselves liberal are now worshiping at the alter of big government and monopolistic corporations?  Traditionally liberals opposed government and the establishment and powerful corporations?  Maybe that topic needs its own thread?