Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

What's your opinion about the January 6 attack, Elmer? 

 

 

It is a 61 page thread Fudd.

 

I have given my opinion multiple times.

 

and NO, I don't expect you to go back to look for them.

 

I just want you to consider why you 'thought' otherwise.

 

 

 

Posted

 

Hmmmmmm.

 

Woman Arrested for Trespassing in Capitol Riot Case Told to Denounce White Privilege By Her Own DEFENSE Attorney.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/06/25/woman-arrested-for-trespassing-in-capitol-riot-case-told-to-denounce-white-privilege-by-her-own-defense-attorney-n1457110

 

January-6-feature-photo-screen-cap--730x

 

An Indiana grandmother up on trespassing charges in the Capitol riot case was told by her court-appointed public defender to denounce her “white privilege.” The defense attorney gave her a reading list to reprogram her political views in order to cut a deal for no prison time for trespassing on January 6. She’s the first of the trespassers to be sentenced.

 

 

Posted
57 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Hmmmmmm.

 

Woman Arrested for Trespassing in Capitol Riot Case Told to Denounce White Privilege By Her Own DEFENSE Attorney.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/06/25/woman-arrested-for-trespassing-in-capitol-riot-case-told-to-denounce-white-privilege-by-her-own-defense-attorney-n1457110

 

January-6-feature-photo-screen-cap--730x

 

An Indiana grandmother up on trespassing charges in the Capitol riot case was told by her court-appointed public defender to denounce her “white privilege.” The defense attorney gave her a reading list to reprogram her political views in order to cut a deal for no prison time for trespassing on January 6. She’s the first of the trespassers to be sentenced.

 

 

 

From that day forward, the grandmother will identify as a 7ft Asian woman. 

Posted
6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

It is a 61 page thread Fudd.

 

I have given my opinion multiple times.

 

and NO, I don't expect you to go back to look for them.

 

I just want you to consider why you 'thought' otherwise.

 

 

 


You took time out from spamming to answer and this is your answer. Hahahahah

 

Back to copy and paste Elmer. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, John Adams said:


You took time out from spamming to answer and this is your answer. Hahahahah

 

 

Yep.

 

Too bad that you didn't take a "time out" to consider why you are asking questions that are answered.

 

 

Hint: Your limited world view.

 

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, John Adams said:


You took time out from spamming to answer and this is your answer. Hahahahah

 

Back to copy and paste Elmer. 

dimwit definition of spamming: posting something non leftist or marxist in nature

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

dimwit definition of spamming: posting something non leftist or marxist in nature


No. Spamming is dumping more pastes than Elmer’s on expiration day. Every day. 

Posted
On 6/25/2021 at 1:25 PM, Governor said:

When it’s whites, it’s “Boys will be boys.”

 

When it’s not, “gun them down!”

You are truly a racist if you think the issues in Portland and Minneapolis were caused primarily by black people. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Quote

A spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who has been slamming McCarthy for opposition to the commission, put out a written statement. "It’s troubling that it took a two-month-long public pressure campaign for Minority Leader McCarthy to meet with Officer Fanone,” the statement said. “It’s even more troubling that McCarthy refused the officer’s reasonable request to publicly condemn the Members of his Conference who have attacked the heroism of those who fought off January’s insurrection.” The statement continued, "McCarthy’s behavior in Friday’s meeting is just the latest example of House Republicans’ growing contempt for police and law enforcement officers who keep us safe.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/28/democrats-hold-gop-accountable-refusing-defend-law-or-order/

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

 

 

 

 

Imagine going through years of preparation, the full FBI selection process, training at Quantico, and then being told to go arrest at 69-year-old lady who took selfies in the Capitol

— Poso (@JackPosobiec) June 29, 2021

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Imagine going through years of preparation, the full FBI selection process, training at Quantico, and then being told to go arrest at 69-year-old lady who took selfies in the Capitol

— Poso (@JackPosobiec) June 29, 2021

 

 

 

Keep driving home it was an inside job... nice!

 

Meanwhile:

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Fascism is only bad when you fantasize the other side is going to be engaging in it...

  • Agree 1
Posted

 

 

PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD: 

 

GOP Calls Democrats’ Bluff on the Capitol Riot. 

 

“Democrats are posturing as defenders of the peace, defenders of order, defenders of ‘the temple of democracy’ itself.

 

Yet Democrats have a humongous gaping weakness when it comes to defending order, and Republicans are deftly moving to expose it.”

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/06/29/gop-calls-democrats-bluff-on-the-capitol-riot-n1458126

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD: 

 

GOP Calls Democrats’ Bluff on the Capitol Riot. 

 

“Democrats are posturing as defenders of the peace, defenders of order, defenders of ‘the temple of democracy’ itself.

 

Yet Democrats have a humongous gaping weakness when it comes to defending order, and Republicans are deftly moving to expose it.”

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/06/29/gop-calls-democrats-bluff-on-the-capitol-riot-n1458126

 

 

 


Whataboutism: this time comparing protesting democracy that turns into a break in at the US Capital vs tree huggers at a sit in. 
 

Nice “equivalency” Elmer. 

Edited by John Adams
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

January 6: The Process Is the Punishment

By Mike Ford

FTA

 

 

Observers have recently commented that the January 6 criminal cases are being treated differently from other cases, often, referring to criminal cases arising from Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests and/or Antifa riots. The difficulty in making that comparison is that those cases are often not similar to the January 6 cases in ways that the law considers relevant to the question of equal treatment.

 

However, the claim of unequal treatment is, in fact, legitimate. A comparison of the January 6 cases to other federal cases involving the same kind of conduct demonstrates that the January 6 cases are being treated significantly more harshly by DOJ and the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office.

 

{snip}

 

My colleague goes on to walk the reader through the tradition of protest in these United States and how protest in our Nation’s capital is specially protected and given wider latitude than in other places. Misdemeanor trespass (which is the charge for the vast majority of the January 6th “rioters,”) is usually dealt with via a $50.00 bond/fine and no court appearance or conviction. However, in the case of the evil Trump supporters, the Department of Justice is literally putting them through the wringer.

 

For our purposes here today, this is the money quote from Ms. McAdoo Gordon’s article:

 

Thus, each January 6 defendant faces multiple court appearances in D.C. federal court, where a lawyer is a necessity, and the result will be a criminal conviction on his or her record unless the defendant goes to trial and secures an acquittal. In the event of a conviction, the defendant faces jail time or probation or both, and there is no possibility of ever sealing or expunging the case. The process is expensive, time-consuming, and nerve-racking.

 

Note the huge difference. Leftist demonstrators, some even violent, get a $50.00 slap on the wrist and most importantly, NO criminal conviction on their records. Those who dare to support a vulgarian President and protest the obvious theft of an election, even if not convicted, will still suffer the full power of the Federal Government. While not only having to pay their own lawyers by the billable hour, these victims of government abuse also get the privilege of paying taxes to fund the outsized salaries of the corrupt government attorneys harassing them.

 

Once merely a tool to pressure real criminals that have committed real crimes, the left has discovered that “lawfare” can be used to modify behavior and/or punish their enemies. There is the case of a Christian baker who refused to bake a cake specifically celebrating a same-sex “marriage,” which violated his religious beliefs. His case went all the way to the Supreme court, where he won after much personal angst and severe depletion of his family’s net worth. That didn’t deter the left. They have again gone after him on the “trans-gender” front. Their objective is to either get his willing compliance or run him out of business.

 

 

More at the link: https://redstate.com/darth641/2021/06/29/january-6-the-process-is-the-punishment-n404403

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, John Adams said:


Whataboutism: this time comparing protesting democracy that turns into a break in at the US Capital vs tree huggers at a sit in. 
 

Nice “equivalency” Elmer. 

 

This is the kind of response the board expects from BillZtime, Tibs, or the like.

 

 

Equivalency ?

 

Tree Huggers =  While many Americans protested after the death of George Floyd, many of those protests devolved into arson and looting.

In a tragic irony, this violence in the name of helping black people destroyed black lives, black livelihoods, and black monuments. Antifa black bloc agitators led or took part in many of the riots, especially in violent hotbeds like Portland and Seattle. The noxious ideology of Marxist critical race theory inspired a great deal of the violence.

 

The looting, vandalism, and arson that took place between May 26 and June 8, 2020, resulted in at least $1 billion to $2 billion in insurance claims

 

merlin_2810255.0.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcTI-IJMcO36MwcukGr47s6

 

merlin_173048241_e8f406ac-62dd-44bc-92f0  5ed3a162-3715-47a4-bd85-62dd34988460-AP_

 

 

 

You are losing it, Fudd.

 

 

.

Posted
49 minutes ago, John Adams said:


Whataboutism: this time comparing protesting democracy that turns into a break in at the US Capital vs tree huggers at a sit in. 
 

Nice “equivalency” Elmer. 

 

Tree huggers at a sit in.  LOL!  Yeah, except they then stole the trees, lit them on fire as well as everything else, and stabbed people with them.

 

But other than that, totally non-equivalent.

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...