Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

My statement is confirmed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"'No!' exclaimed O'Brien. His voice had changed extraordinarily, and his face had suddenly become both stern and animated. 'No! Not merely to extract your confession, not to punish you. Shall I tell you why we have brought you here? To cure you! To make you sane! Will you understand, Winston, that no one whom we bring to this place ever leaves our hands uncured? We are not interested in those stupid crimes that you have committed. The Party is not interested in the overt act: the thought is all we care about. We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them."

 

- 1984 by George Orwell

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

My statement is confirmed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"'No!' exclaimed O'Brien. His voice had changed extraordinarily, and his face had suddenly become both stern and animated. 'No! Not merely to extract your confession, not to punish you. Shall I tell you why we have brought you here? To cure you! To make you sane! Will you understand, Winston, that no one whom we bring to this place ever leaves our hands uncured? We are not interested in those stupid crimes that you have committed. The Party is not interested in the overt act: the thought is all we care about. We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them."

 

- 1984 by George Orwell

 

 

"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it."

George Orwell

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it."

George Orwell

 

 

Billzy accidentally correct.

 

 

 

 

 

</snip>
 

James Cusick was shocked, she said, to find out what the arrest was about. When he was at the Capitol he was friendly with officers, who directed him to a bathroom. His daughter says that they never told him to leave. He began to defend himself, but the agents and sheriffs reminded him that everything he says can be used against him and to wait until he has a lawyer.
 

“I asked him if they would take the handcuffs off of him because I was upset seeing my 73-year-old father in handcuffs. They said no,” Stacey said.
 

The search warrant, provided to the Gateway Pundit, showed that they were looking for any clothing he wore during the protest — specifically including a red hat that read “Trump” on the front. After a search and some questioning, they took Stacey and her father inside and asked him to get the clothing items he wore that day, which he did.
 

They also asked him to get his passport and told Stacey to bring it to court when she goes to pick him up after his arraignment. She was told that he will be tried in the state of Virginia or Washington, DC.
 

“They said that they understand that and that they’re ‘not the bad guys, we’re just here doing what we’re told,'” Stacey said. “My dad loves this country. He volunteered to go to Vietnam and fight. He served 16 months there proudly. He has taken so many kids on trips to Washington, DC, to let them see this great country. He’s very passionate about this nation. He’s a pastor and he holds the Constitution in a very high regard. He hates what is happening to this country, but he would never vandalize or harm any government property, or anything for that matter. He’s a very upstanding man and I was devastated to see him taken away.”
 

</snip>

  • Angry 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Billzy accidentally correct.

 

 

 

 

 

</snip>
 

James Cusick was shocked, she said, to find out what the arrest was about. When he was at the Capitol he was friendly with officers, who directed him to a bathroom. His daughter says that they never told him to leave. He began to defend himself, but the agents and sheriffs reminded him that everything he says can be used against him and to wait until he has a lawyer.
 

“I asked him if they would take the handcuffs off of him because I was upset seeing my 73-year-old father in handcuffs. They said no,” Stacey said.
 

The search warrant, provided to the Gateway Pundit, showed that they were looking for any clothing he wore during the protest — specifically including a red hat that read “Trump” on the front. After a search and some questioning, they took Stacey and her father inside and asked him to get the clothing items he wore that day, which he did.
 

They also asked him to get his passport and told Stacey to bring it to court when she goes to pick him up after his arraignment. She was told that he will be tried in the state of Virginia or Washington, DC.
 

“They said that they understand that and that they’re ‘not the bad guys, we’re just here doing what we’re told,'” Stacey said. “My dad loves this country. He volunteered to go to Vietnam and fight. He served 16 months there proudly. He has taken so many kids on trips to Washington, DC, to let them see this great country. He’s very passionate about this nation. He’s a pastor and he holds the Constitution in a very high regard. He hates what is happening to this country, but he would never vandalize or harm any government property, or anything for that matter. He’s a very upstanding man and I was devastated to see him taken away.”
 

</snip>

The pastor should’ve looted a Best Buy or burned down a Wendy’s...or some other form of acceptable peaceful protest. Dumb s&@t. 😉

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, BillStime said:


Of course - just look how honest and upfront he was with Covid.

While you sat at home ordering food, goods and services from hard working Americans that drove them to your woke front door. Nice! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

The pastor should’ve looted a Best Buy or burned down a Wendy’s...or some other form of acceptable peaceful protest. Dumb s&@t. 😉

 Good answer.  Or attack Federal buildings and property in DNC controlled jurisdictions where crime committed by party members is legal. 

 

But whatever side of the issue you're on we all know what's going on here.  And if anyone wants to pretend its not about this one thing then go ahead.  But let's be honest about it.

 

These round ups of "suspects" related to 1/6 have got nothing to do with "terrorism", or "justice", or a group of unarmed people trying to over-throw the government.  Hell, Joe said yesterday you'd need nuclear weapons and F-15's to pull that off. 

 

What its all about is the political party in control using the events at the Capitol, whether genuine or manufactured, as pretense for an attempt to use the power of the State to oppress and silence its political opposition.

 

If you don't understand that you're just sleepwalking through life.

 

  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 Good answer.  Or attack Federal buildings and property in DNC controlled jurisdictions where crime committed by party members is legal. 

 

But whatever side of the issue you're on we all know what's going on here.  And if anyone wants to pretend its not about this one thing then go ahead.  But let's be honest about it.

 

These round ups of "suspects" related to 1/6 have got nothing to do with "terrorism", or "justice", or a group of unarmed people trying to over-throw the government.  Hell, Joe said yesterday you'd need nuclear weapons and F-15's to pull that off. 

 

What its all about is the political party in control using the events at the Capitol, whether genuine or manufactured, as pretense for an attempt to use the power of the State to oppress and silence its political opposition.

 

If you don't understand that you're just sleepwalking through life.

 

  


image.thumb.jpeg.6f3ece1e9c1d20e5198f48b6509f836b.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


image.thumb.jpeg.6f3ece1e9c1d20e5198f48b6509f836b.jpeg

I got to tell you.  You ruined my day by posting a picture of Satan here.  I can only guess this picture was taken right after she was told that Jeffery Epstein was killed in jail and she realized her husband's sexual activities on his private island with under-age girls would not be revealed. 

 

But you've failed to address my fundamental argument.  And since you can't or won't do that I must conclude you know I'm right.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I got to tell you.  You ruined my day by posting a picture of Satan here.  I can only guess this picture was taken right after she was told that Jeffery Epstein was killed in jail and she realized her husband's sexual activities on his private island with under-age girls would not be revealed. 

 

But you've failed to address my fundamental argument.  And since you can't or won't do that I must conclude you know I'm right.  

 

Oh, I know you feel the need to justify what happened on 1/6 with the protests last year... but it doesn't work like that All "Pro."

 

People protesting the death of another black person at the hands (or knee) of another white people is NOT THE SAME as TRUMPHOLES storming the Capitol because they have been fed lie and lie about the election being stolen.

 

But keep fooling yourself that anyone outside of your cult buys that excuse.

 

And lastly, I fixed your sentence:

 

What its all about is the political party in control using the events at the Capitol BENGHAZI, whether genuine or manufactured, as pretense for an attempt to use the power of the State to oppress and silence its political opposition

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Posted
17 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

People protesting the death of another black person at the hands (or knee) of another white people is NOT THE SAME as TRUMPHOLES storming the Capitol because they have been fed lie and lie about the election being stolen.

 

 

Oh brother.  Talking about having been fed lies.  In your first example, in the George Floyd trial the Officer was not charged with a race crime.  In the second example, the protestors wanted someone to slow down and investigate their concerns.  The first group trashed entire areas of American cities for months and threw all sorts of projectiles at Police Officers.  The second group spent an afternoon in hissy-fit and many took selfies with police officers.  Insurrection, my arse!

Posted (edited)

Was anyone charged with insurrection?

Or for being armed?

What a joke.

Why were some people not charged?

If blm did this not a thing would be done about it.

If a blm was murdered by a cop the left  and the media would have

***** themselves in fury in the same situation.

This whole thing being set up by an agency 

really doesn't seem all that crazy.

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

What's your opinion about the January 6 attack, Elmer? 

Boys will be boys.  These patriots just got a little over zealous and tried to force their way onto the senate floor to stop a democratically elected individual from being voted into office.  Whats the big deal?

 

Its not like they're the human scum who occupied public spaces and protested without a permit like we saw last summer.  Pepper spray and beatings was too kind for them if you ask me.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Boys will be boys.  These patriots just got a little over zealous and tried to force their way onto the senate floor to stop a democratically elected individual from being voted into office.  Whats the big deal?

 

Its not like they're the human scum who occupied public spaces and protested without a permit like we saw last summer.  Pepper spray and beatings was too kind for them if you ask me.

When it’s whites, it’s “Boys will be boys.”

 

When it’s not, “gun them down!”

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Was anyone charged with insurrection?

Or for being armed?

What a joke.

Why were some people not charged?

If blm did this not a thing would be done about it.

If a blm was murdered by a cop the left  and the media would have

***** themselves in fury in the same situation.

This whole thing being set up by an agency 

really doesn't seem all that crazy.

If BLM had murdered a cop or several cops, like those fine folks at the capitol this place would have its first 10,000 page thread.

Retracted due to total inaccuracy.

 

Should have just stuck with questioning your grasp on reality for suggesting 1/6 was a false flag.

Edited by Jauronimo
Posted
1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

If BLM had murdered a cop or several cops, like those fine folks at the capitol this place would have its first 10,000 page thread.

RIP David Dorn, no cop was murdered 1/6 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...