Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

On 6/5/2021 at 3:43 PM, SoCal Deek said:

So who’s been fired at the capital police department? 

 

Now why would Assistant Chief Thomas direct officers not to use all available equipment on that day? 

 

Why would we not want to investigate this more?  Who else was involved?

 

 

On Jan. 6, Thomas directed officers not to use all available equipment, such as heavier less-than-lethal weapons and corresponding munitions that included two types of grenade launchers and sting-ball grenades.

 

If those heavier munitions were used, it would have put the department in a better position to repel the attackers, Capitol Police Inspector General Michael Bolton told the House Administration Committee in April.

 

In the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Capitol, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund left, as did the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What did the critics expect ?  The NARRATIVE comes before anyone's rights

 

 

Solitary confinement for Jan. 6 riot participants draws criticism from Democratic senators and ACLU

by Kerry Pickett

 

Many participants in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots are being held in solitary confinement in Washington, D.C.'s city jail, a situation that's drawing scrutiny from Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey and the American Civil Liberties Union. The Department of Justice has charged 510 individuals in connection with the Jan. 6 breach, which began when supporters of outgoing President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol with the intent of trying to stop the certification of Electoral College votes for Joe Biden as president. After Jan. 6, Washington, D.C., jail officials decided that all Capitol riot detainees be held in “restrictive housing” as a safety measure for the accused.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/aclu-capitol-rioters-in-solitary-confinement

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Why keep the suspect’s identifying information under wraps?

 

A couple possibilities. First, the FBI’s investigation is probably further along than any of us know. They’re collecting data on purchases of the suspect’s Nike Air Max Speed Turf and the timers, etc. used to make the pipe bombs. From that data they cross-reference travel, locations on 1/5/2021, height, shoe size, etc.

 

Second, maybe there’s something else to this story. The FBI has always been sensitive to its public perception and controls information to serve that purpose. For example, the FBI has never been forthcoming about its agents’ involvement with terror suspects. Or, consider whether the pipe bomb investigation would cut against the politics of January 6. I take no pleasure in skepticism of the FBI, but this is a reputation the FBI has earned.

 

Either way, this outside observer can’t help but notice that one group of targets – those who entered the Capitol Building on January 6 – are pursued in the public sphere more aggressively than the person who set out pipe bombs the night before.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oregon House expels state Rep. Mike Nearman, plotter of Capitol incursion.

 

Nearman refused to resign in the face of overwhelming evidence he would be ejected from the Legislature. The four-term Republican lawmaker becomes the first person ever expelled from the Oregon House.

Edited by Governor
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

Gee, if it was that "clear" , how did the Democrat Party fail to impeach President Trump in January ?

 

 

I know.

 

It's a 17 second pulled portion that STILL doesn't say what the poster claims.

 

Their narrative gets weaker, their arguments get more shrill.

 

 

:lol:

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Gee, if it was that "clear" , how did the Democrat Party fail to impeach President Trump in January ?

 

 

I know.

 

It's a 17 second pulled portion that STILL doesn't say what the poster claims.

 

Their narrative gets weaker, their arguments get more shrill.

 

 

:lol:

 

The version I saw with the link from Billsy must cut off before the evidence he’s posting is revealed. 
 

Or—as Billsy and the cleverly named Fitty shades of Whey seem to imply—-is it now illegal to march, talk about marching, contemplating marching and the like?  
 

Seems to me it is not (yet). 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...