Doc Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 LOL! That landed with as much of a thud as Trump's taxes. 1 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: For those of you that care about our republic and Constitution: Epic seeing the left talk democracy and the republic while sharing war mongering Bill Kristols dreams of the state attacking the opposition to the establishment. 2
BillsFanNC Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 23 hours ago, Westside said: No, just hope they stop being hypocrites. You might as well hope that the sun rise in the west tomorrow. 2 1
Tommy Callahan Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 LOL, and now its Raw story. if its not some shady PAC, it's a site that's never even attempted journalism. but explains a lot.
BillStime Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 9 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LOL, and now its Raw story. if its not some shady PAC, it's a site that's never even attempted journalism. but explains a lot. Oh c'mon - you would have loved if it had come from Breitbart or REDSTATE, right? Idiot tries so hard.
Tommy Callahan Posted December 26, 2022 Posted December 26, 2022 31 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh c'mon - you would have loved if it had come from Breitbart or REDSTATE, right? Idiot tries so hard. yes you are trying really hard. they all the same silly.
Westside Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 5 minutes ago, BillStime said: Audio Nobody gives a damn. Now let’s do hunters laptop and see how much the “big guy” made?
BillStime Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 2 minutes ago, Westside said: Nobody gives a damn. Now let’s do hunters laptop and see how much the “big guy” made? Nobody cares but here you are… lolz And yet - Hunters laptop has been dangling in front of voters for 2 plus years and the voters have not once but twice said: Who the F cares? And btw - why do you care so much about Hunters laptop yet conveniently look the other way when it comes to all of the corruption associated with the Trump administration? The amount of money the Trump org over charged the US government and taxpayers? Ivanka’s Chinese trademarks? The Saudis $2 BILLION donation to Jared’s PE firm? How much of that went to the big fat guy? Keep crying about Hunters laptop - it’s cute.
Orlando Buffalo Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages?
Doc Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 58 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? They don't care. And neither does anyone else about J6 anymore. Just they don't care about the Summer of 2020.
Tiberius Posted December 27, 2022 Author Posted December 27, 2022 1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said: I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? So you don't care Trump tried to violently steal the election, correct? 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So you don't care Trump tried to violently steal the election, correct? Violently? Ok nice job of lying to avoid the question.
Tiberius Posted December 27, 2022 Author Posted December 27, 2022 40 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: Violently? Ok nice job of lying to avoid the question. Oh, Jan 6 wasn't violent? Ok 😩
ChiGoose Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 13 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal? Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political? Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery? More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful?
BillStime Posted December 27, 2022 Posted December 27, 2022 29 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. Who had the most to benefit if they were successful?
ChiGoose Posted December 28, 2022 Posted December 28, 2022 23 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal? Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political? Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery? More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful? Obviously there are going to be politics involved, it’s Congress. The question was whether is was purely political, which I do not believe is true. We only have reporting on Cheney keeping the focus on Trump, so I can only speculate as to why Bennie Thompson would accept her demands. Maybe it was to keep the committee working together and prevent fracturing. I dunno. I haven’t read the full report yet but I heard it doesn’t mention Ginni Thomas at all. I’d imagine that was at Cheney’s insistence as well. In the end, people will likely just believe what they want to believe anyway.
Recommended Posts