ChiGoose Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, Doc said: Just playing the blame game. Dems think it's Trump's fault because he weakened NATO something or other. Personally, I think it's Putin's fault. But that's just me.
SoCal Deek Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 This isn’t complicated…Biden green lighted a small incursion. There’s no telling whether he saw this drawn out conflict coming, but he definitely did not make a move to stop it. Does it make it his fault? Of course not. 1
njbuff Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: I would think that the President of the United States trying to overturn an election based on debunked conspiracy theories is something worth wanting to know about. I would also think that seeing an entire political party swallow those lies and now campaign on them to ensure that they can overturn elections when they don’t like the outcome is newsworthy. Well, the committee that was selected to run this farce should know an awful lot about debunked conspiracy theories, starting with Limogate yesterday.
ChiGoose Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: This isn’t complicated…Biden green lighted a small incursion. There’s no telling whether he saw this drawn out conflict coming, but he definitely did not make a move to stop it. Does it make it his fault? Of course not. The Biden administration spent weeks publicizing intel about Russian movements and warning Ukraine about an imminent invasion even though Ukraine disagreed with the US position. That's a green light?
PetermansRedemption Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 Maybe I don’t understand what this committee is supposed to be doing. But their star witness yesterday, isn’t her testimony the definition of hearsay? Which is not admissible in court?
SoCal Deek Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: The Biden administration spent weeks publicizing intel about Russian movements and warning Ukraine about an imminent invasion even though Ukraine disagreed with the US position. That's a green light? You don’t watch the news much….do you? Yes, when asked, the President said OUT LOUD it would all depend on whether it was just a ‘small incursion’. That is 100% a green light.
Doc Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 16 minutes ago, PetermansRedemption said: Maybe I don’t understand what this committee is supposed to be doing. But their star witness yesterday, isn’t her testimony the definition of hearsay? Which is not admissible in court? It's a kangaroo court. So hearsay is totally acceptable (and apparently believable by a lot of people on the left).
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, cle23 said: So now it's Biden's fault Russia invaded Ukraine, a country as previously stated, they have been occupying portions of for over 10 years. You guys are something else. It could be a complete coincidence that Biden is at the helm when Putin chose this massive invasion. That it happened on the watch of a political lifer, whose tendencies are well-studied, well-known and well-established cannot be discounted. That Biden is on record as wanting to destroy the fossil fuel industry, and is out marketing the Putin Price Hike while seizing on the opportunity to pimp electric vehicles is a consideration as well. Is the invasion of Ukraine really a bad thing for his agenda? Frankly, when considering his threat to withhold badly needed aid to Ukraine as VP if the government did not bend to his will immediately makes you wonder how concerned he really is about the people in Ukraine at least as it impacts his agenda. This issue will tied to him like a stone, as it should be, and as he would do to his opponent.
BillStime Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 4 hours ago, Doc said: He had nothing to do with it, and even you know it. OTOH, if he'd only announced that Ukraine would not be joining NATO, it wouldn't look like a parking lot full of rubble. More lies.
ChiGoose Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: They've been trying to get him for a bit, but I'm surprised it took this long for them to subpoena him.
BillStime Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 19 minutes ago, Doc said: Where's the "yawn" emoji? 2
B-Man Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 Whoops: CNN Political Commentator Coordinated With J6 Committee on Cassidy Hutchinson Testimony https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/06/30/whoops-cnn-political-commentator-coordinated-with-j6-committee-on-cassidy-hutchinson-testimony-n586861 Funny, That There's Zero Pushback on this 😎 1 2
B-Man Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 Here’s What The Jan. 6 Show Trials Are Really After BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND JULY 01, 2022 The Jan. 6 Committee’s Stalinist show trial serves many purposes, but truth is not one of them. On Wednesday, the House committee holding hearings on the violence that broke out at the capitol on Jan. 6, 2020, issued a subpoena to former White House counsel Pat Cipollone. Cipollone, who had voluntarily participated in a closed-door interview in April, “decline[d] to cooperate” further with the committee, according to the letter subpoenaing him to testify before the committee on July 6. It is unclear whether Cipollone will comply with the subpoena, but from the committee’s perspective, it doesn’t matter. The Democrat-stacked committee seeks to score political points, not secure the truth, and subpoenaing Trump’s former White House counsel serves that objective: If Cipollone refuses to testify, his assertion of executive privilege provides the committee a fresh opportunity to condemn Donald Trump while the committee provides the public its own version of the events the former White House counsel supposedly observed. Scoring partisan points is not the only goal of the Jan. 6 Committee. Rather, the carefully massaged hearings seek, at minimum, three broader political objectives. Propagandize Americans About Election Integrity Silencing Complaints About Election Irregularities Safeguard the Swamp Much more at the link; https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/heres-what-the-jan-6-show-trials-are-really-after/ 1
BillStime Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 👆🤡 Here is why Bonnie and DR are going nuts: About half say Trump should be charged for 1/6: AP-NORC poll
Recommended Posts