ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I see. And that was going to happen how exactly? Because Nancy was going to say “Well if Mike wants to delay it, I guess we have to!” ???? Trump, Giuliani, and Eastman wanted Pence to delay the certification and send the election back to the states. I agree that this is an insanely stupid idea that makes no sense, but it was the plan that the President of the United States was pushing.
SoCal Deek Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Andy1 said: Just because their plan wasn’t iron clad logical means nothing. By this time Trump was ignoring the advice of the rational legal staff around him. He was only listening to the nuts he surrounded himself with : Guliani, Flynn, Stone, the pillow guy, the crazy woman lawyer, etc. There was nothing logical at all with that brain trust. Best thing I’ve read about this charade of a hearing yet….and quite possibly the most accurate.
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2022 Author Posted June 28, 2022 29 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: We can’t undo the past Tibs, my guidance to you is a matter of public record. Let’s move on. You keep responding to someone that thinks you are an idiot. Let's move on
The Frankish Reich Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: The plan was to have Mike Pence reject or delay certification of the election so that they would have more time to put pressure on the states to undo their results. Exactly. There was one target on Jan 6, and one target only: Mike Pence. Trump was following the John Eastman script where Pence would refuse to certify the electoral slate from certain states. Pence wasn't going to do it, unless .... unless he legitimately feared for his life or safety, both on Jan 6 and later. It was a desperation move, but that was the plan. Oh, there was another plan too: shut down the counting of the votes and the certification of the election by storming the Capitol. That might just delay things long enough for Pence to accept an offer he couldn't refuse. And yes, the senile and moronic (sometimes both at the same time!) advisors actually thought this could work. Edited June 28, 2022 by The Frankish Reich
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2022 Author Posted June 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, Andy1 said: Just because their plan wasn’t iron clad logical means nothing. By this time Trump was ignoring the advice of the rational legal staff around him. He was only listening to the nuts he surrounded himself with : Guliani, Flynn, Stone, the pillow guy, the crazy woman lawyer, etc. There was nothing logical at all with that brain trust. They knew that their supporters would believe any garbage they vomited out, so the plan kind of didn't have to be intelligent. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They knew that their supporters would believe any garbage they vomited out, so the plan kind of didn't have to be intelligent. And remember: many of these supporters (Ashli Babbitt was one notable example) were full-on, all-in, 100% QAnon adherents. To them, this was it ... The Storm they were promised.
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2022 Author Posted June 28, 2022 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: And remember: many of these supporters (Ashli Babbitt was one notable example) were full-on, all-in, 100% QAnon adherents. To them, this was it ... The Storm they were promised. 1776
Andy1 Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 Trump was right about one thing - he could shoot someone in the head on a sunny day, in the middle of 5th Avenue in NYC and his followers would still support him. They would still give him their money for his legal defense fund after he claims that he was set up by Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton.
B-Man Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 37 minutes ago, Andy1 said: 28 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: 15 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: 1 hour ago, ALF said: 1 hour ago, 716er said: 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Peter Alexander @NBCNews Chief White House Correspondent LOL ! 2
Tiberius Posted June 28, 2022 Author Posted June 28, 2022 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Peter Alexander @NBCNews Chief White House Correspondent LOL ! This is good. @B-Man writes a post media can't be trusted, its unfair to Republicans. Then a Republican says something bad about Trump and the "untrustable" media gets a source contridicting the story, and the media is great for a moment
LeGOATski Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: So if I understand you correctly the master plan was to overturn the election, over throw the government and then hold onto power under the protection of an unarmed guy in a bear suit? If that was the plan then I agree with you…Trump’s a nutcase! He definitely is. 1
BillStime Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 48 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Exactly. There was one target on Jan 6, and one target only: Mike Pence. Trump was following the John Eastman script where Pence would refuse to certify the electoral slate from certain states. Pence wasn't going to do it, unless .... unless he legitimately feared for his life or safety, both on Jan 6 and later. It was a desperation move, but that was the plan. Oh, there was another plan too: shut down the counting of the votes and the certification of the election by storming the Capitol. That might just delay things long enough for Pence to accept an offer he couldn't refuse. And yes, the senile and moronic (sometimes both at the same time!) advisors actually thought this could work. You’re all forgetting ab important part of the Pence puzzle: “At 2:26, after a team of agents scouted a safe path to ensure the Pences would not encounter trouble, Giebels and the rest of Pence's detail guided them down a staircase to a secure subterranean area that rioters couldn't reach, where the vice president's armored limousine awaited. Giebels asked Pence to get in one of the vehicles. 'We can hold here,' he said." Pence told Giebels: "I'm not getting in the car, Tim." "I trust you, Tim, but you're not driving the car. If I get in that vehicle, you guys are taking off. I'm not getting in the car," he said. Source Pence was smart enough not to go and was determined to stay and finish the job. Of course the cult plays dumb and asks stupid questions because they play games and are purposely dishonest - aka @SoCal Deek.
BillStime Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 39 minutes ago, B-Man said: Peter Alexander @NBCNews Chief White House Correspondent LOL ! Can’t wait to get them all under oath and clear up the record!
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You keep responding to someone that thinks you are an idiot. Let's move on Exactly as I suggested above. We’ll say it was your idea. I’m skipping ahead a bit, but when what happened here today clicks for you—and I’m confident it is not entirely impossible that you one day you will think for yourself and learn, I wouldn’t be offended if you played this at PPP graduation: 1 1
Tiberius Posted June 29, 2022 Author Posted June 29, 2022 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Exactly as I suggested above. We’ll say it was your idea. I’m skipping ahead a bit, but when what happened here today clicks for you—and I’m confident it is not entirely impossible that you one day you will think for yourself and learn, I wouldn’t be offended if you played this at PPP graduation: Have fun
B-Man Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 BOMBSHELL? Surprise Jan. 6 Witness Claims Trump Grabbed Limo Wheel, Wanted to Join Capitol Protesters. It’s two Trumps in one! 1
ChiGoose Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Peter Alexander @NBCNews Chief White House Correspondent LOL ! This tells you all you need to know about how dumb these arguments are. One person testifies under oath. Another person challenges that but not only will not testify under oath but they wont even put their name to their statement. That’s good enough for @B-Man! Priors are confirmed. So anonymous source outweighs sworn testimony. Even if the Secret Service has been cooperating with the investigation. 1
B-Man Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: This tells you all you need to know about how dumb these arguments are. One person testifies under oath. Another person challenges that but not only will not testify under oath but they wont even put their name to their statement. That’s good enough for @B-Man! Priors are confirmed. So anonymous source outweighs sworn testimony. Even if the Secret Service has been cooperating with the investigation. Wow, thats an impressive amount of gibberish. It's not "Another Person" challenging that sonny, it is the actual agents and driver. You know, the ones that the "under oath" person (who was not even there) discusses. They have already testified. So if they do come out tomorrow and discredit today's democrat "bombshell" I am sure that @ChiGoose will admit his/her error. . Edited June 29, 2022 by B-Man 1 1
Recommended Posts